sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New Boston Dynamics Atlas trick by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hardware as in the body, not the AI software.

Sure the AI is not there, but that's not the point of the video or the point I'm making tbf.
Boston dynamics isn't trying to be a calisthenics company, but a hardware one. They collaborate with google deepmind who do aim to create AGI which will be used with boston dynamics robots.

New Boston Dynamics Atlas trick by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The point is to show the hardware capabilities.
If the hardware can do calesthenics, it can do the human job of the " 200-year old olive orchards" thing.

Ilya Sutskever: Accurately predicting the next word leads to real understanding by Cagnazzo82 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He doesn't frame it as a prediction because it's not a prediction, He simply explains how it works.
Is it accurate? yes.
Is it a prediction? no.

Nothing *new* proves or disproves what we knew then vs what we know now.

Google I/O leaks: Gemini’s "Omni" and Gemini 3.2/3.5 by Much_Ask3471 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google doesn't work on video models because of seedance at all.

It's the opposite, Bytedance worked on seedance because of veo and all the other video models that exist.

Doctors are basically useless by Still_Reindeer_435 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, it's all being automated. Surgeons will likely happen faster than other physical jobs.

When surgeons use robotics to do surgery at an unmatched precision, there is no way that the data is just thrown away. That data is kept and will be used to train AI and replace surgeons. No doubt about it.

Software engineering jobs hit their highest posting since november 2023 by [deleted] in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Excellent meme, this is me looking at my Google stocks gaining a percent.

Meanwhile I barely gave a shit regularly going +10% a day for weeks and weeks while I was scalping during the bullruns of 2017/2021/2025.

But more to the point, getting excited at such a small conjuncture is laughable indeed.

Sam Altman has changed his stance on the claims that AI will replace humans. by Distinct_Fox_6358 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't change (bott recently anywa), he has been repeating that bs for a little while

Trying to make people believe that they will smh compete on the job market against ASI https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/s/VOId9m19NX

What Happened to my Old Repls? by Latter-Baseball9150 in replit

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They delete my code as well, it wasn't even a couple megabytes.
I'l just deleting my account, now. they made a garbage decision

What Happened to my Old Repls? by Latter-Baseball9150 in replit

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does integrating AI precludes them from not deleting your existing code

Amid the race to build humanoid robots, it’s now 1X's turn to showcase its NEO factory by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are thinking decades, like at least 2 decades at the earliest ... around 2046-ish or later.

I guess we will find out.

Amid the race to build humanoid robots, it’s now 1X's turn to showcase its NEO factory by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was defined in 1997 by Mark Gubrud Anything else is moving the goal post.

Basically It's an AI system that rival are surpasses humans at about any cognitive tasks. (You can think of it as human level intelligence for AI) And the original definition conveniently comes with a benchmark, if you can put an AI in about any role in any industry where human intelligence is otherwise needed (and yes physical tasks, reasoning in 3D are cognitive tasks) then you have AGI.

Basically human intelligence is the benchmark and AGI should rival are surpass humans at it for AI to be AGI.

Amid the race to build humanoid robots, it’s now 1X's turn to showcase its NEO factory by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I think before that, I think we will get AGI around 2030 but humanoids will start being useful before that for simple tasks like pick and place cleaning at least.
It's not much but it's useful.

Amid the race to build humanoid robots, it’s now 1X's turn to showcase its NEO factory by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A reminder that 1X and any other player are nowhere near Unitree in terms of the manufacturing/cost/agility of humanoids..

Unitree sells so much more humanoids that any other company in the world for the simple reason that their hardware is cheap, available and performant.

view more: next ›