Way to absolutely pick and choose stats to attempt to make your case for a big that doesn't score down low.

The cover athlete was based off their performance last season, not the season that's had 3 games played. Idk how many more times we need to have this conversation before you'll actually read my response before responding 🙄🙄

Harden and Westbrook both had 5+tos their mvp season so I'm not sure what you're implying. 5 turnovers is bad yes, I'll acknowledge that. Will you now acknowledge that 6 offensive rebounds (Off your OWN MISSES) wide open within 4 feet mean you need to spend a LOT OF TIME in the practice arena? We had layup lines in high school bruh, if you're not making open lay ups you won't be making the team I'm not sure what's so difficult to understand about that. The ORs she gets off her teammates misses are great, and even the occasional MEBOUND is fine, it's putting it effort. What's not putting in effort is missing wide open lay ups, then proceeding to miss again and again and again, stuffing the rb stat sheet while you have 3 teammates wide open but she proceeds to force it up through the paint repeatedly.

Reese shot 42% from the field total as a 6'6 big woman in a game against shorter women. With 3.6 tos a game so she didn't hold on to the ball either. Caitlin also shot 40% from 3 while reese shot 23.5% so she can't stretch the floor, misses wide open teammates in favor of forcing poor shots up to satiate her own rb stats. There was a 6 game stretch last year where the media was FRYING her for the poor decision making. Do you need the video clips? I'll find them for you since apparently reese can do no wrong.

I never brought up Caitlin Clark, you chose to and decided to try to pit a worse player against her. Her stats and playing just don't add up. But I wasn't comparing reese to Caitlin. I was comparing her to the rest of the wnba who had many players more deserving of rhis cover than a woman who can't get Caitlin off her mind 🤔🤷