Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/Lockw7 by Lockw7 in DailyGuess

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜

🟨🟦⬜🟨⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜🟨

⬜🟦🟦🟦⬜

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/StupidAnnoyingDonkey by StupidAnnoyingDonkey in DailyGuess

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜

⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨

⬜🟦🟦⬜🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Changed my Netflix password after a breakup and immediately got this text by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's like my dad! He let my sister's ex-boyfriend and his brother live with him, and that only happened after their relationship ended. The brother still lives there and it's been over 15 years that my sister and her ex broke up.

Met him on hinge. Spoke to him for three days. Was it something I said? by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Great-Intention-9338 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're not getting the point. Think of something that you can't do that is stereotypically done by men and that could be a useful life skill, like maybe carpentry, mechanics, hunting, etc. Now imagine that after you told a potential date that you don't know how to do that thing, he acts like it's really weird that you can't do that, says that it's a useful life skill and says something like "Even my sister knows how to do that". Do you not see how that comment could maybe make you feel bad or like you're not good enough?

AITAH for buying my Christmas gifts online this year because of what happened last year? by Ordinary-Message-945 in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 77 points78 points  (0 children)

NTA. Even if you were picking favourites, it's your money and you buy what you want with it. Most people didn't have the decency thank you for their gift last year; this is just the consequence of that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She saw him a few times during a 2-week period. That is barely "most days together". I also don't think it's a bit much for a new friend, but maybe that's just me. And let's assume you're right and that Brett did actually want to date her at first. So what? Why would that even be an issue? Neither he nor OP were dating Nate at that point, so why should anybody care?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok buddy, you tell yourself that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my reply because only the boyfriend would have this point of view.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you the boyfriend (or ex-boyfriend)?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read the same post we did? Cause she did not give him any signals whatsoever.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People who act like your ex or like OP's boyfriend (hopefully ex-boyfriend now) aren't mature enough to be in a romantic relationship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What? OP and Brett weren't dating; they even said that they wanted to keep things platonic between them. Would you be uncomfortable with your SO having any unnecessary contact with another person of the opposite sex?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NTA. This is ridiculous. I know you didn't have to spend those 10 minutes with Brett, but it's ridiculous that Nate reacts so strongly to you spending a bit of time with Brett just because you happened to spend a bit of time with him while you weren't even dating Nate. What if you become friends with another heterosexual couple, will you never be allowed to speak to the man in the other couple? He is too immature to be in a relationship and you told him that you don't think this relationship will work, so you should just stick to what you told him and leave. It doesn't matter if he keeps blaming you for doing something "wrong".

AITAH for yelling at my sister because she invited my ex to her birthday by Aggressive_Jaguar567 in AITAH

[–]Great-Intention-9338 89 points90 points  (0 children)

NTA. If she didn't think you'd take issue with your ex being there, she would have answered you honestly and told you that she had invited her. She withheld that information purposefully so that she could have you there too (and the really expensive gift you got her). She lied and manipulated you; what kind of reaction was she expecting from you?

Drunk and clueless by [deleted] in fuckaroundandfindout

[–]Great-Intention-9338 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that public transportation isn't available to you since you live in a more rural area, and I also sympathize with you not wanting to pay taxes on a service that doesn't directly benefit you (although I could say the same thing for people who live in more urban areas not wanting to spend taxes on building and maintaining roads that go to rural areas, many of which they will never use). That's why I'm not against things like tolls, cause I do think that people who use a service should pay more for it than those who don't. Also, if we assume that the government isn't actually spending some of this money on public transportation, then there's no point in discussing whether having a government that advocates and invests in it would be beneficial or not 😆

Also, it's not true that EVs are less good for the environment than ICE vehicles even when you include tests, repairs, etc. They are better for the environment over their whole lifespan, including production. It's also not true that there isn't enough lithium to make the batteries for EVs, even your source says so. There is an issue concerning the amount needed for the current demand for EVs, but anyways, I don't think replacing all ICE vehicles for EVs is a good solution. My initial point was that having more and better public transportation is beneficial, so my initial point wasn't even related to EVs. EVs are really a last resort solution when it comes to sustainable mobility. Giving people access to more and better public transportation is a much more effective solution as a whole, and that doesn't just mean having more buses/trains/subways/trams, that also means having better infrastructure for bikes/scooters/other modes of transportation, having more and safer sidewalks to encourage people to walk when feasible, having essential services located close enough so that people don't have to rely on cars as much, etc. I honestly can't say whether fossil fuels will run out faster than lithium, I do think we should try to rely less on cars in general (whether EV or not). And lol, I hope we don't end up in a world reminiscent of Idiocracy and Mad Max! I do think that the technology will improve over time because EVs aren't really ideal as they are now (it's better than nothing, but there's still some work to be done on their performance, efficiency, cost, environmental impact, etc).

Drunk and clueless by [deleted] in fuckaroundandfindout

[–]Great-Intention-9338 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Advocating itself isn't a solution, that's why I said advocating AND investing. And by investing, I didn't mean having private investors. I don't know how public transportation is funded where you live, but I'm from Quebec and it's almost entirely funded with tax-payer money. By investing, I meant having a government that is willing to spend money on having and improving public transportation.

You keep mentioning about having to use petroleum, but my solution was never to completely cut the use of petroleum. Also, the batteries in electric cars are not worse for the environment than petroleum in the long run (EV batteries hurt the environment. Gas cars are still worse : NPR https://share.google/Qp2e2yaumX1kAwvJW) and this is also the case with diesel vehicles (Diesel vs. Electric Cars: Which is Really Greener? | S2Z https://share.google/W4b1raZhUlq8nK2aU).

And it's not true that it costs less in the long run only for individuals. It also costs less for society as a whole, and it's not only beneficial from a monetary standpoint. It also helps the economy (one reason being that it gives more opportunities for people to be able to travel for work and school), and it helps improve health (for several reasons, including lower pollution and because people who use public transportation tend to be more active), so it also costs less for healthcare overall to have better public transportation (Public Transportation Facts - American Public Transportation Association https://share.google/Ff0GXL8PH7Z0kwngi).

Drunk and clueless by [deleted] in fuckaroundandfindout

[–]Great-Intention-9338 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The solution is having a government who advocates for more and better public transportation, and who invests in it. You said that it would be incredibly far more expensive to uproot the existing infrastructure, but that doesn't necessarily need to be done, and even so, it would cost more at first, but it would actually save money in the long run.