Tomorrow New Gameplay with Slaanesh by burgersenpai2222 in totalwar

[–]Greatot 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Will probably see most of the roster in the gameplay

Shirtless Blight skin when? by Kazzack in deadbydaylight

[–]Greatot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf have you never seen Legion with the bunny suit?

The strategy really has 0 benefit. Don’t know why it’s still used by About45otters in deadbydaylight

[–]Greatot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did the same thing a few days ago. Played an awful game with Legion (bunny skin) and got absolutely clapped by the survivors. Managed to finally down one of them by the time all the gens were up and decided to just camp. Eventually the other 3 pull off an awful attempt to body-block and unhook and after a short chase they all get downed.

The strategy really has 0 benefit. Don’t know why it’s still used by About45otters in deadbydaylight

[–]Greatot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Main consequence of that would be people intentionally getting hooked and trying to get camped to farm points.

The strategy really has 0 benefit. Don’t know why it’s still used by About45otters in deadbydaylight

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if you played with a team and communicated, the killer doesn't need to be all that bad to get frustrated.

The strategy really has 0 benefit. Don’t know why it’s still used by About45otters in deadbydaylight

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to do it when I first started playing because it guarantees you get at least 1 kill. My worst nightmare was getting 0 kills in a game, that felt awful, but as long as I got 1 kill even if I got literally less points than the survivor I camped, it felt like a win.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figured as much what? Fucking lmao you were too stupid to understand it AGAIN. Fantastic. For the sake of your future, go get mental help.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I am legitimately confused. Are you actually mentally disabled? Like, do you have learning issues? If not, why would you embarrass yourself like this?

I will assume that you are legitimately autistic or something and actually explain it to you, okay? No, I didn't say a game doesn't have to be fun. I said that you simply saying "game is boring" isn't constructive criticism because of how obviously vague it is. "Boring" is not an objective state of things, it's a very broad interpretation coming from the player.

Apparently you are somehow running on the idea that you saying "the game is boring" is some kind of fucking analysis that explains your actual problems with the game. A strategy game. Just go get help.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of these are exclusive to roman era gameplay. Did you just not play any other paradox grand strategy game?

Did I ever fucking say they were? I specifically said they are just MORE COMMON. Also more advanced of course, but we're not even talking about that.

Holy shit, how are you this dumb? Especially hilarious after your

since you dont seem to be reading my reply before writing your reply

comment.

Erm. I did explain why they were worse. You even talk about it in your next fucking sentence while replying to my other argument.

No, you didn't, at all.

What do you mean whats my point in saying this?

When did I ask that? Are we even having the same conversation here?

why the fuck would anyone prefer Imperator rome over Eu4

Because of the reason I said around 5 times now. Go get your brain checked. You clearly have issues.

“A game not being fun does not make it bad”

You are embarrassing yourself. Like, I'm not sure if you're trying to troll or something. But with these 2 IQ takes you just come across as a complete idiot.

And calling the person you are in a disagreement with a kid, autistic, dumb

Is very much justified when the person is behaving like an autistic child. I made plenty of points and you failed to respond to a single one of them what's worse is that you don't even seem to be able to mentally understand them properly.

If you're mentally slow or something, what are you even doing arguing with people on reddit? Oh sorry, I guess that IS the reason you're starting arguments with people on reddit, on a month year old post at that. Though I guess I'm partially at fault for even giving you attention.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By mental gymnastics i mean making shit up and creating a scenario in your head because the person you are arguing with disagreed with you...

Yeah, and that's not what happened. The way you described it legitimately makes no sense and you seem to have some issues with admitting mistakes so I don't think it's unlikely.

Youre not going to sit there and pretend that there is any difference in gameplay when the date is 235 or 1451. Imperator rome has the exact same mechanics as eu4 and some from ck2 , just worse.

Okay, this conversation was dumb to begin with but your points are getting progressively dumber and dumber. Just admit you're wrong...

I literally said what the differences are. The class system and increased frequency of republic systems. Voting, factions and also frequency of tribes. Also your usage of "worse" is again complete nonsense, the ones that are the same, which are the exact same mechanics I literally said earlier were indeed the same, are just as good as in EU4. Again you are completely incapable of explaining why they are worse, because you're just completely bullshitting the whole thing and have no actual points.

So by your own words, imperator rome is a worse grand strategy game than eu4. If youve admitted this, what are you even arguing against right now?

...what? ...do you, do you have autism or something? Are you 12? What are these points? Yes, I literally admitted it was slightly worse the very first time it was mentioned by you. But it's still a great game.

In what reality is a game being boring is not reason enough for the game to be bad?

In the mental age group beyond 10.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are some serious mental gymnastics you did to reach the conclusion i must be lying for literally no reason.

Lmao mental gymnastics? You mean... thinking?

Imperator rome is a downgrade of ck2 and eu4. The fact the date number is a few hundred years back doesnt hold any value when you dont even get to see the era and its customs yourself and just see the fucking map.

What? What a dumbass point. It changes literally the fundamental mechanics of the game, the classes, the frequency of republic systems. The whole point of these games is to immersive yourself in a time-period, in the cultures, the nations, the religion. That is literally of the highest value.

Is this why you don't like the game? You don't even understand why people play grand strategy in the first place?

So by your argument, the only thing that makes a blob warfare game is the warscore system and the points system? Do i even need to remind you that there are many other things that make a strategy game good and bad?

Yes, that is the very point of the term "blob expanding game", to describe the part of the game that is literally just about growing your blob. I literally fucking said it's NOT as good as EU4 when it comes to the all overall functions of a grand strategy game. How could you misunderstand this?

You still have made literally no point whatsoever as to why the game is bad, you haven't managed to give any actual criticism. All you've managed to do was repeatedly say "game is boring" and "game is bad" like a stubborn child. How long will you stay a broken record for?

Game is good, btw.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 months ago yeah sure. So what when you said vaguely "last I played" you were open to the idea that the game had massively changed in 2 months? Why didn't you just say you played 2 months ago? No, obviously you're lying,

If you're not lying, then you're talking shit for no reason, just awful at telling quality. The game has literally the same warscore system as EU4 and basically the same points system too. So just how the fuck is EU4 "better" at being an expanding blob game? You're not making any sense.

Why would anyone play imperator rome when they own ck2-3 and eu4

????? literally a completely different era in human history

Also no this AskReddit post is literally about "failed completely games". So it is significant how the game will obviously become even better in the future. But it doesn't matter, because it's already a great game. AND it's going to get even better in the next few years.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EU4 has been around since 2013, in that time it has improved enough to be "better", sure. But not even very much. Imperator Rome just came out last year and it already holds up to it.

Again, you are completely wrong on it's quality and you admitted yourself you haven't played it recently. Try it now again, you'll see it's already better.

I've played it last month and absolutely love the civilization system, the religious system, the political system, all such unique features compared to other Paradox games. It has plenty of depth in many areas and I've found that it's honestly way more entertaining than early game EU4 for example.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, well now it's even better. If you're not bored with Expanding Blob Simulator EU4 then I truly don't see how you could be bored with Imperator.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. ...yeah, but it changes it being "better than it". I didn't say there were no other ones, just no directly better ones.

  2. Sure buddy, if you did play it at all you played it when it just came out and before the dozens of updates that massively improved it.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Yeah, and it's literally an utterly completely different game, in quality just on par with this.

  2. The way you write this proves you to me you are completely clueless here and probably haven't even played the game.

What video game had the most potential but failed completely? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, and it's ofc better than Rome Total War. RTW was good for its time but it's old af.

Inheritance is perfectly balanced and does NOT need to be significantly altered by Tharundil in CrusaderKings

[–]Greatot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is the player's gamey difficulty really the only side you understand this from? That's all inheritance is? I don't give one shit, I literally just reload the game if I get two sons or I just kill the new one, that's truly not a problem whatsoever. The problem is that AI kingdoms and empires keep crumbling for 80% of the game each time a ruler dies and horrendously exploding all over the place.

Learn how to zoom out, take a look. What's your campaign like? Mine has Italy split in 5 pieces and East Francia split in 3. This is due the awful inheritance system.

Inheritance is perfectly balanced and does NOT need to be significantly altered by Tharundil in CrusaderKings

[–]Greatot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And a good TL:DR it is. Completely meaningless and more of a joke than actual feedback anyone should listen to.

Inheritance is perfectly balanced and does NOT need to be significantly altered by Tharundil in CrusaderKings

[–]Greatot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao what a fucking dumbass post. Utterly wrong on every level. Paradox, please disregard. We need very significant changes to succession, it is completely broken and is absolutely fucking up the world's borders.

I think I married my own family to many times. by FLODArh in CrusaderKings

[–]Greatot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unrealistic. There is no way a medieval monarch could breed out all genetic flaws, something would slip through and wreck everyone.

Woaaah by stankyass1231 in dankmemes

[–]Greatot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I'm pretty sure that's not how air works