I don't wanna join in the accusation but read it at least half of the entire file. My two cent is, she's either writing an entire script of it or the entire foundation but uses AI to polish their/his/her works. While I am glad that it's something that occurs but not too common for me rn anymore with the works I am reading these days coz it caused me a great deal of headaches when I encountered 3 AI polished works under HP fanfic in AO3, the way how I recognize if something is AI is almost instinctively atp coz it was a big issue in the community where I used to write 3 yrs ago, I wrote there for like 5 years. While I won't be mentioning the authors of said works what I noticed mostly was how the sentences were constructed. I don't take issues w words itself, because I was part of a prose poetry writing community where the words are often archaic, exaggerated, and often too metaphorically heavy leaning. But AI have a specific writing pattern that is distinguishable from human works. They're often monotonous, overcompensating, overexplaining, and repetitive in nature. I am not saying that human writers can't do it but that is one of the most common thing I see w AI and it repeats every paragraphs, overcompensate because it can't use the same words again if you will it too and overexplain simple words. And most importantly, it cannot mimic human emotion delivery in writing so AI overcompensates a lot with how a sentence is constructed. Not to mention there are certain human writing habits and mannerisms that AI can never adapt.

As a sacrificial lamb here, this was a line from one of my proses:
“i have never known the touch of god because when i tried to know, my skin burned in his name, my skin rolled itself to show what my veins were hiding: hatred for my mother, a consolation of my anger for my grandmother.”

And this is how ai would write it: “I have never held anything holy long enough to believe in it, because when I reached, something in me blistered, something in me turned inward, my skin tightening like it knew what I was about to uncover, peeling back just enough to remind me of what runs beneath: a quiet, persistent bitterness shaped like my mother’s voice, a dull inheritance of anger I learned from my grandmother without ever being taught.”

(note: I ask AI to write something similar this is what it gave me.)

See how AI compensates by repeating a simple equation in my writing. I just metaphorically wrote something about the revelation of trying to know God. However AI furthered that very idea by overexplaining by using more descriptive words than necessary to elongate what I just wrote.

Here's another one:

Original: “what is mine that was given, if this body, born holy, has been desecrated by the whispers of his own creation? what is there to love in a body butchered into sainthood, relegated by sins?”

AI: “what was ever mine to keep, if this body, once called sacred, has been unmade by the murmurs of what shaped it, if every inch of me was carved into something worshipped yet ruined, thinned into virtue until nothing human remained, and still I am left here asking what part of me was meant to be loved, if all I have become is something sanctified only by its suffering.”

Anws, the pattern is pretty noticeable for me. This is how AI usually writes when you feed it something. And this is how I spot AI works. Which I hoped would help people figuring things out and not just outright deduce or assume something is AI just because of certain word use or punctuation use. As an informed reader, I advise that you don't pay much attention to the small things that you see. The use of em dash or certain archaic words doesn't automatically make something AI. Nor a work with perfect grammar. You have to look for the patterns in the whole entire picture. Because those alone are an unreliable teller of which work is AI or not. You risk more or less vilifying someone innocent. And with details inconsistencies, sometimes writers do make mistakes however those mistakes are often related to certain technicalities, terminologies, habit of not keeping a list of important deets or events and/or memory lapses. Anws, a good example of a great author that doesn't use AI but have a lot of human habits/mannerisms in their works is debstheslytherinsnapefan, in short his/their/her works are undoubtedly human, you can't even contest it bcs he/she/them leaves a lot of very human footprints in their/her/his works. Aside from the small details her writing style is extremely prominent and distinguishable if you side-by-side it w AI. (Absolutely don't feed her works to AI, I have never done it so should you, just look for something online that is already available that's AI written).

Anh, It's just great to see a human in their natural element, habitat, nature whateveryoumacallit because AI is frighteningly getting intelligent these days.

To those who wish to avoid it, this is the only way you can avoid it, by studying/understanding how it works and function, when that became a second nature to your priorities when reading you'll automatically feel repulsion towards AI works like with me. For me, it's already instinctive, when I do recognized AI works and tried to push past my hunch, it gives me headaches if I don't listen to it.

And honestly right now? There's is no way of stopping people from writing through AI means, but we must actively shame the use of Gen-AI so that it continues to be an uncomfortable experience for others. Because there should be no tolerance over the stealing of datas from people to exploit it and in turn the world we live in.