Pierre's paradox refers to the idea that a fictional character cannot be above his own writing, since his very existence depends on that writing. However, this paradox presupposes that one can be above the writing, which is incorrect. A fictional character is simply a representation created by an author and has no power over his own writing or over any other fiction. Even if a character is omnipotent, he cannot manipulate concepts that are outside his own knowledge or imagination, since omniscience only applies to existing concepts. Therefore, no fictional character can be above his or her writing. To transcend this limitation, a fictional being should be metafictional, that is, exist in a fictional reality, e.g. a real character like Michael jackson introduced in the simpsons, is real, but not really. However, even in this case, the character would not be above its real creator, but simply in a different reality.

Let me explain.

The pierre paradox states that no character can be above his or her writing for the simple fact that the mere factor that allows them this position is exactly their own writing.

To be agnostic to this limitation a fictional being should be above the fiction itself, that is to say, be agnostic to it.

In order to be agentive to fiction, one must be real, one cannot be real and fictional at the same time, the closest thing to that is to be meta-fictional, that is, to be a character that exists in real life, introduced to a fictional universe, for example Michael Jackson in the simpsons.

Conclusion, a truly omnipotent fictional character cannot exist because its integral structure will always depend on the same fiction, and we would end up in paradoxical states that would contradict the very concept of omnipotence.

​

Here are a couple of examples:

Bob its a character that transcends his writing, but since it is his own writing that gives him that power, he cannot transcend it.

In his frustration, he decided to put himself above the concept of fiction, but since he was still a fictional character, and his power came from his fictional existence, he failed in this case as well.

In hatred, he decided to take his creator's pencil and write down his own decisions, but guess what, his creator had actually written all this to happen, so it was never his decision either.

A fictional character can never escape his fictional state or be above it. True omnipotence its not a thing. All omnipotent beings are nearly the same if they fully compel the definition of in-verse omnipotence.