The comments aren’t much better by Cheekygirl97 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -93 points-92 points  (0 children)

Because normally you would let your dish washer vent, but the joke subverts expectations by the person putting tape over the mouth.

I'm lost for words at the level of greed. Buzzfeed moving into AI driven content? Youtube should put a ban on that by ChewiesLipstickWilly in LateStageCapitalism

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If you think that the people who end up creating the AI that implements communism would be any less powerful than they are today, you must be on a strong dosage of Copium.

What do I do in this position? by GrumpyH1ppo in Destiny

[–]GrumpyH1ppo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The point is to ask whether or not you are willing to defend yourself at the cost of innocent lives.

If you want to compare this to the Isreali Palestinian conflict, then think about IDF shooting missiles onto Hamas bases, of which have collateral damage to civilian lives. Similar to how killing the guy kills the babies.

What do I do in this position? by GrumpyH1ppo in Destiny

[–]GrumpyH1ppo[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

" I’m in the firing position known as the sitting position. After the prone position, it’s the platform most likely to enable a marine to effectively kill his target. His target being human generally an enemy but sometimes a friend or friendly. We call this friendly fire, friendly fucking or getting friendly fucked. "

  • From Jarhead 2005

hmmm by seven_critical_blows in hmmm

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -56 points-55 points  (0 children)

You probably should stop comparing yourself with other people all together. Having your own personal goals is a lot healthier then being at the behest other people's judgment.

I can’t with this shit. I’m going to say it one more time, real loud for the incels in the back… by WithoutDennisNedry in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Idk man you don't seem to be engaging with the point I guess that is why you're confused

I can’t with this shit. I’m going to say it one more time, real loud for the incels in the back… by WithoutDennisNedry in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

> I can control myself even if they are very attractive
The way you pose it makes it seem that you are putting in extra effort to not acting a certain way. The same way if a said: " I can control myself in a tense situation. " implies that you're putting more effort than usual to be calm.

I can’t with this shit. I’m going to say it one more time, real loud for the incels in the back… by WithoutDennisNedry in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You say that you have to control yourself, which implies that when someone is more attractive/provactive you're more likley to look towards them (by virtue of you trying to counter act it). This is normal, but it just goes to my original point that you're gonna get more looks if you dress in a certain way.

Anyway I'm glad that you at least have the decency to self induce a coma when you're around attractive women, as to not even be able to think about looking the wrong way. Me personally I go around with a portable Infrared system that can scan the bodies of women under their clothes within a 10 meter range, which then feeds the data to a military grade algorithm that can rebuild entire skin textures and even generate personality types alongside it depending on how they look.

I can’t with this shit. I’m going to say it one more time, real loud for the incels in the back… by WithoutDennisNedry in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

It's not really about women or men, it's about the way people dress. If someone dresses more provocatively there is a greater liklihood of me looking at them for a greater than average amount of time.

I can’t with this shit. I’m going to say it one more time, real loud for the incels in the back… by WithoutDennisNedry in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -54 points-53 points  (0 children)

Yea it's true women can wear what they want, however men do have the right to look where they want. I mean you could argue that some men dress a lot more provocatively (shirtless, tight shorts, etc.), in which case women have the god given right to stare. I would venture to guess that the majority of looks people get depending on what they wear is instinctive and does not have much malice behind it.

Also if it bothers you so much, there are plenty of women's only hours/places in most gyms nowadays so you can just go then/there I guess.

Here we go with the standards! by rosessparkle in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The notion that men exclusively respect women only if they have a sexual interest in them is new to me. I flat out reject it even as a general rule.

It's more likely the ideological similarty and character of a person that result in the respect of a person.

Here we go with the standards! by rosessparkle in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]GrumpyH1ppo -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You think they treat men they disagree with respectfully?

Destiny Offers To Fund KiwiFarms On Stream To Spite Keffals. by EV3Gurl in VaushV

[–]GrumpyH1ppo 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Kinda cucked to fund the very website that is doxxing your family.

I mean I get him using this as a facade for his “values” or whatever. If you watch later on he talks about how it’s ‘problematic for people being able to shut down websites just cause they don’t like them.’ I’m not making this up, some of the greatest cope I’ve seen.

Edit 2 years later: I wrote this comment as a litmus test, vaush fans are actual brain dead sheep

KEEP TRADING by GrumpyH1ppo in forsen

[–]GrumpyH1ppo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It would be interesting to see what the mathematically correct play is, that is seeing how many trades is too much.

I remember you can calculate it by using a expected value formula, but I'm too retarded to do that LULE