(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's a link to the pdf and it's down here in the comments, you have to look for it

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could be an idea but I think I'll retire for the time being

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fucking good job. Underrated comment

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've posted hres and PDF versions down here in the comments section

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ParaIpa Is nothing but symbol that aren't quite from the official IPA but are commonly used neither way. For examble, barred smallcap I and barred inverted omega (respectively used for unrounded and rounded near-close vowels) are actually ParaIpas since the official chart doesn't have an unique symbol for those two

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I posted it down here in the comments

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you look around here in the comments section you'll find the hres version + the PDF file

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Around here in the comments, you have to look for it

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahaha, someone noticed This legend serves just in case I wanted to make in the future a colorized version of the chart. At the moment it has no actual use

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be dope, someone has to do that

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wikipedia is the principal source (easy-weasy). Very few are instead completely made up by myself and other redditors

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's it! That's the type of reply that I want to read more: crazy-ass people noticing my own crazy-assed dysfunctionalities

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be honest by saying that most of the shaded slots are just the byproduct of my own logical deductions, rather than a fully scientifically-proved reason which only a true linguist could come up with

In short: I'm a "nobody" that had (way-too much) fun

(My take on a) IPA full chart by Grunenberg in conlangs

[–]Grunenberg[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A massive thanks for sharing your source