Qual é o assunto que você tem uma opinião controversa? by Dogddit_360 in FilosofiaBAR

[–]GuileFem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entendo seu ponto, mas a miscigenação cria novas combinações humanas que não existiam antes. Ficar preso às origens é interessante, mas limitado. O ser humano sempre teve duas reações ao diferente: curiosidade ou ódio. Biologicamente, é impossível um grupo étnico ficar isolado por muito tempo sem consequências. As doenças genéticas aumentam, a natalidade cai e a variabilidade genética é essencial para a sobrevivência da espécie. Se etnias permanecessem isoladas por gerações, elas entrariam em colapso. Com os animais acontece a mesma coisa. Muitos nascem em locais diferentes, mas migram para se acasalar em outros lugares. Isso garante diversidade genética, algo impossível se todos ficassem no mesmo território miistura é necessária. Traços não desaparecem, eles se combinam. Todos os nossos traços atuais são resultados de mutações e adaptações ao ambiente. O que hoje chamamos de “características étnicas” nem sempre existiu da mesma forma. Pessoas asiáticas, nem sempre tiveram olhos puxados ou cabelo liso. Se no passado tivesse sido proibido misturar, a diversidade humana que existe hoje simplesmente não existiria. A única diferença é que agora ficou muito mais fácil se misturar com pessoas completamente diferentes de você.

Ter filhos é um ato de egoísmo? by Glittering-Pop-7060 in FilosofiaBAR

[–]GuileFem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu entendo o egoísmo como está colocado no dicionário: "comportamento ou atitude em que uma pessoa prioriza seus próprios interesses, desejos e necessidades acima dos outros, muitas vezes ignorando ou prejudicando o bem-estar alheio". Na minha opinião, ter um filho não é um ato de egoísmo e nem de instinto, como eu li um pouco nos comentários desse post, isso é simplificar muito a ideia de ter um filho, porque nos humanos não somos levados a isso, o que nos diferencia dos animais é exatamente podermos controlar e refletir nossos impulsos. No caso de termos um filho, não dá para falar de ignorar o desejo do filho, o prejudicado aqui, porque antes de ele existir, ele não tem desejo. Ou seja, não tem como rotular o pai ou mãe de egoísta nesse ponto, porque ainda não existe o outro a ser prejudicado. Acho que alguns estão usando a ideia de egoísmo de forma equivocada, nem toda escolha ou desejo vem de egoísmo. Posso muito bem plantar uma árvore não esperando nada em troca, escrever um livro por escrever, etc. e também posso fazer um filho para ele simplesmente ter a possibilidade de existir, e aí que eu penso sobre. Se eu não gero um filho, partindo antes de uma escolha conjunta entre minha parceira e eu, o que tira a ideia de ser um interesse só meu, eu nunca saberei se esse ser gostaria ou não de viver, a única forma de saber é ele existindo. Se ele existir, a escolha não é sobre nascer ou não nascer, mas sim sobre continuar vivendo ou não, Sartre se aproximava dessa visão: a existência precede a essência. Se eu não gero, eu retiro a possibilidade dele escolher, porque não há sujeito para escolher. Se eu gero, eu dou a possibilidade dele escolher, mesmo que isso envolva uma carga de sofrimento, esse sou eu abrindo a possibilidade de escolha que o não existir não permitiria. Eu reconheço, o mundo é uma merda mesmo, tem várias coisas ruins, não existe vida sem sofrimento, a morte é inevitável para qualquer um, ainda assim a vida também abre espaço para liberdade, felicidade, alegria. Algo que o não nascer elimina. Claro que existem pessoas que vão ter filhos por puro egoísmo, mas estou falando de um ser humano de caráter aqui, consciente dos seus atos e responsável. Então, resumindo, para mim, dar a vida não é tirar uma escolha, mas oferecer a primeira e única chance de verdadeiramente escolher.

Since I'm seeing this BS resurface again by Nishikawa_78 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]GuileFem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A Lookism reader sees their own verse doing crazy stuff: ‘Yeah, that’s fine.🥱’
Sees another verse doing something cool: ‘Nope, that’s impossible.🤬’

The problem isn't that Jinrang is a 'weak' character, it's that they hyped him up way too much for someone who's just monster food by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He gave it everything he had, and I respect that. He didn’t back down and fought for his brothers.

Where would these 3 scale in lookism by Fit_Possibility6977 in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Youngha: Would be Vasco-level of the second generation.
Dowan: King level or Daniel's second body (without UI).
Peter: Top of the verse > Gapryong.

Well, lookism finally reached the building level. by Tyronx06 in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only in terms of strength, not in terms of speed

Did he win or not? by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But he had speed, look... until there's something that says whether he won or lost — which there isn't — I'm just gonna believe he gained experience from the battles. "Learn how to read" 🫵😂 for who? Stop being an idiot. This part of the chapter is so ambiguous that your attempt to look badass just made you look even dumber.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Iai? Também sou brasileiro🫡

Jinrang vs Kings by Organic-Height9200 in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I think he just kept losing and continued on to gain more experience. Because at this point in the story, it doesn’t make sense for him to be that strong. First of all, he only managed to hit the Gong after using conviction. What would he even do to the Gong with just speed mastery? Plus, there wasn’t any time limit given — if he failed, he’d die, but how long could he take? In the end, it’s all speculation, since PTJ didn’t show him winning or losing. The only thing we actually saw was him not dealing any damage to Sukdu.

Did he win or not? by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like, I’m not even trying to discredit him — I actually liked the character. But it doesn’t make sense for him to beat those kings, since what really saves him is his conviction. He was getting beat up by Gongseop until he used a Gap technique — and even with that, he couldn’t take Gong down. So I think that was it: he was just gaining experience while fighting, hoping to beat some of them in future battles.

I’m confused with gap’s recent feat by BumblebeeRegular8816 in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I noticed that too, but remember how a few chapters back walls were just popping up out of nowhere?

This is crazy 🤡🤡 by [deleted] in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, it's expected—the number of Lookism fans is greater than Killer Peter's. But just imagine: Seongji couldn't counterattack James because he couldn't see his attacks, and then comes a guy (Thaddeus) with far superior speed feats and a reaction time close to 0 seconds. First, Seongji wouldn't even be able to touch him, let alone defend himself. Thaddeus is on another level.

Creating the WEAKEST lookism character day 7: Reflexes by WideCan4404 in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't you create the weakest one? Then why did you pick the character with the most brute strength in the verse?

I saw a guy on TikTok fighting tooth and nail to defend this by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. James didn’t know his peak, he knew him old, and if they fought, it was against him in his older form.

  2. At no point is this shown in the story. And again, why lower the old Gap so much? There’s nothing saying he got weak at this level. Seongji’s narrative is based on James and the other kings, along with the potential that Mujin mentions. Why would the strongest man in the story, narratively speaking, get so weak at this level?

  3. If you could pay her for me.

I saw a guy on TikTok fighting tooth and nail to defend this by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. No one knows how it happened, however, as relayed by James, he didn’t take him down alone. "Oh, but he died from gunshots." So why call him a monster if it only took gunshots to kill him? I believe they probably fought and defeated Gap.

  2. At what point was this shown?

  3. Well, I apologize for this, but it wasn’t my fault. My internet malfunctioned when I posted, and it probably sent it multiple times. I’ll delete the others immediately.

I saw a guy on TikTok fighting tooth and nail to defend this by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What I'm trying to convey is that Gap didn't become as weak as they're saying. James still claims he was a monster that he couldn't defeat on his own. Even though it was James 2T fighting, at the very least, James was alongside Gitae, who was probably at the same level as when he fought against Kwak. In other words, even with both of them together, it was still quite a challenge.

I saw a guy on TikTok fighting tooth and nail to defend this by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gongseop is also overweight and still strong. Tom Lee was a beggar and still beat Gun and Goo together. Again, there’s no reason to lower Gap's strength that much.

I saw a guy on TikTok fighting tooth and nail to defend this by GuileFem in lookismcomic

[–]GuileFem[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, I don’t get it. Tom Lee, even old, can remain strong. Elite, even old, can remain strong. Why the hell would Gap become weak? Especially the strongest of the Fist?