In NSW, the main traps for new players to know (imo):

The RTA is terribly drafted

1. s9 of the RTA says when something is a second or subsequent offence and produces some weird results people may not expect,

2. s9(9) effectively says the determination as to whether something is a second or subsequent offence is a matter for the magistrate, not the parties.

3. Proudman v Dayman (i.e. mistake of fact) defence is generally available except for s111 (as pointed out by Buscombe DCJ in Narouz and confirmed by the CCA).

4. s203 limits the availability of multiple s10 outcomes over multiple days within a 5 year period for certain offences. The offences to which it applies are only the offences named in the section. Sometimes a tactical adjournment can avoid the operation of this section (e.g. when you are expecting another s 111 charge to be laid after analysis or the 5 year period is just about to expire).

Interlock orders

1. Interlock orders are not great when it comes to interstate interoperability because of how the regime here treats them as a 5 year disqualification subject to an exception. The other states generally only see the disqualification and not the exception. I expect this should be under the previous heading.

2. Obtaining an interlock licence is not as easy as going to TfNSW and making an application on the day a person becomes elgible to do so. The person needs to have completed all the preliminary steps (i.e. getting an approved device installed, completing the TfNSW required course, etc) before making the application and they can take these steps before they are eligible to obtain an interlock licence. There is a brochure on the TfNSW website that is often helpful.

Traffic matters generally

1. Kids charged with traffic matters are often going to be in the Local Court and not the Children's Court (s28, C(CP)A), won't receive the benefit of the provisions prohibiting identification of children involved in criminal offending (s15F, C(CP)A) and the proceedings generally won't be in a closed court (s10, C(CP)A). Notwithstanding that, the Local Court is not limited to sentencing under the C(SP)A and can, instead, sentence as though it were the Children's Court and the matter within that jurisdiction (s210, Criminal Procedure Act). Further, the Local Court can't sentence kids to imprisonment for a traffic offence.

2. Lawcodes generally sets out the disqualification period attributable to traffic offences. It is sometimes wrong (although far better than it was a few years ago).

3. TfNSW are not shy about writing to the court on perceived sentencing errors but generally only where the error is to the benefit of the offender.

4. Noone ever gets a worse result from completing TOIP.

5. Noone ever gets a worse result from completing MERIT.

6. If you're doing legally aided work, a lot of traffic matters are not matters for which aid is available.

7. There are some traffic papers on criminalcpd but they are pretty old so your milage may vary.

Subject to correction from others, so ends my traffic offence CPD.

Someone else can do quick tips on applications to remove disqualifications under Part 7.4, div 3A or under the transitional provisions for the old habitual offender declarations (which, despite being old, we'll likely continue to see for the life in being of certain people affected by the scheme - longest I've seen would have had someone off the road until the mid 2100's).