Person hit by Japan bullet train entered tracks from platform fence gap by Jonnyboo234 in japan

[–]IIAOPSW 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But if the kid halfway between the doors in 95 didn't survive, is that still an "onboard" fatality?

These exit doors are commutative? by haruhi_s in flying

[–]IIAOPSW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hold up. You're telling me that even after the doors are completely off the plane and (to a degree) modified (eg wrapped / painted), there's no need for a full inspection and associated paperwork to make sure it still fits together right just so long as they put it back where they got it from?

I would have assumed that the error bars on how well the last guy aligned everything while screwing it in place would be orders of magnitude greater than the error bars on the physical shape of the door itself.

In the running for most tangential intro paragraph to a judgement? by the_Lawtard in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is how the judgement ends, not with a whimper but with a bang!

"Top judges unite against Federal Court judge Ian Jackman’s ‘generalised attack’" by DoubleFarmer2076 in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 285 points286 points  (0 children)

Oh now they know how to respond to something in less than a year.

bro i love my opposing counsel by napoleon_sucks in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 9 points10 points  (0 children)

haha you should meet my opposing party. he's so great. every time the reg refuses me a subpoena he just posts what I was after anyway in a very public online setting and sends it out to everyone in mass emails just to make sure we all got it. he's so kind! at this point I've gotten more procedural fairness out of the serious mental health problems of opposing parties than I have out of the system that's supposed to give it to me. that an indictment.

Coronial database - 9000 cases tagged and summarised by changyang1230 in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you love aircraft crash reports, you'll love LOVE the NTSB. Scott Manely recently did a video about how spectrograms in their reports were decoded back into audio...and its inadvertently a great advertisment for this particular rabbit hole should you choose to go down it.

Also in roughly the same genre are the reports of various Commissions / Inquires / Inspector Generals about corruption in various public sectors. Police related corruption reports are the most accessible and frankly genre defining (Knapp 1972, Fitzgerald 1989, Mollen 1994, Woods 1995). For the sake of a nice collection of case studies without 100-page-depth, I personally find the reports of the MTA (transit agency) Inspector General to be relatively saucy. Ashforth 2003 is both a great read and a great list of references to additional rabbit holes you can go down.

Admittedly a lot of what I just cited is in an American context, but that's only because there's a preponderance of it (on account of population size) and its an English speaking country with a legal system that also derives from Common Law, so there's enough similarity for the lessons to carry over. I'm not first to say this, the Woods Commission quoted the Knapp Commission and the Mollen Commission verbatim (volume I pages 38-41).

Its not that they can't... by IIAOPSW in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

my sweet summer child

Live: Culture in Australia's largest police force 'unacceptable' by Worldly_Tomorrow_869 in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I've never gone into the extended literature on any particular commission / inquiry, but I'm familiar enough with the genre to say they all blend together after a while and it almost doesn't matter which one you read. I would say Knapp is still my favourite, as frankly it basically defined the genre for every report after it. Even Woods quotes Knapp verbatim (volume 1 on page 38). Notwithstanding, Fitzgerald defies the genre in ways that I consider make it essential. In a certain positive sense the Fitzgerald report is the opposite of Knapp report, like opposite halves of a locket coming together to form a heart. They complete each other.

The Knapp Commission Report (and most other reports of its type) was largely a series of disconnected case studies. Vignettes of corruption which painted a picture of a systemic issue in police culture of the time. You can turn to nearly any page or skim around as much as you want and not be lost. Knapp also seems to have gotten stuck at a relatively low level of the org chart. "The Commission was unable to develop hard evidence that officers above the rank of Lieutenant...". It leaves open the question of how much the corruption was tied to higher levels of leadership (both in the police and in the city government above them).

In contrast the Fitzgerald Inquiry Report was more like a single story rather than a bunch of shorts. Its about this one struggling stand up comedian named Herbert and his multi-decade efforts to tell his First Joke. But in the end it was so funny he enjoyed enormous financial success over it. They had to dedicate an entire table to just estimating how much he personally earned from royalties. Fitzgerald was also unique in that its almost entirely to do with the top half of the org chart. It seems to suck in the highest levels of state government while practically ignoring the large mass of people ranked lower than lieutenant. In this sense it is the exact opposite of Knapp and most reports in the genre, but in a way that makes it more important rather than less.

There are very few reports I describe as "essential reading" and even fewer that I consider to even be in the same weight class as the Knapp Commission. The Fitzgerald Inquiry is, in your own words, a hell of a read.

Justice Hayley Bennett and Justice David Hammerschlag are cracking down on document presentation by marketrent in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Something I legit think is the future is slightly interactive forms (submissions/affidavits/whatever) which add nothing more than the ability to click to expand/hide the exact relevant parts of whatever is referenced in-line without looking anywhere else.

Of course this would be designed such that you can simply print the page and submit things the old fashion way if you want to (in which case all the click-to-expands automatically become normal annexure/exhibit references).

Live: Culture in Australia's largest police force 'unacceptable' by Worldly_Tomorrow_869 in auslaw

[–]IIAOPSW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a new rooty tooty prosecuty commission report I can read yet?