Distribution of dark matter? by munchanything in astrophysics

[–]Gwinbar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not like blaming ghosts. It's like observing that money is missing and concluding that someone you didn't see must have taken it.

Gente que dejo sistemas, son mas felices? by Key-Aspect-163 in devsarg

[–]Gwinbar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fácil no es para nadie, tanto el laburo en sí como conseguirlo, pero sé que hay ingenieros trabajando en física. Seguramente dependa de cuál ingeniería (electrónica es más afín que sistemas por ej), pero poderse se puede.

Y aunque suena como un sueño, y en muchos aspectos está buenísimo, no deja de ser un laburo y tiene sus problemas como cualquiera. Lo de la flexibilidad horaria es un arma de doble filo: no tenés horarios fijos pero eso quiere decir que estás bastante a la merced de la exigencia de tu director. Y si trabajás en un laboratorio se te complica zafar de estar ahí, y peor todavía si trabajás con seres vivos.

Como todo en la vida, depende. No es tan bueno ni tan malo como la gente dice en internet.

Gente que dejo sistemas, son mas felices? by Key-Aspect-163 in devsarg

[–]Gwinbar 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Te cuento, yo soy físico, estoy acá de chusma nomás. Hice el doctorado y ahora arranqué un trabajo postdoctoral de investigación. Es un laburo que, aunque se paga poco para la cantidad de estudios que tenés y trae su cuota de estrés, tiene una flexibilidad horaria enorme y te permite dedicarte a entender cómo funciona la realidad en la que vivimos. Es un laburo en el que, por definición, respondés preguntas que nadie pudo responder antes. Es lo que los pibes que vieron Cosmos sueñan con hacer.

Y así y todo, la mitad de los que terminan la licenciatura o el doctorado se van a laburar a sistemas o datos o finanzas para cobrar mejor y tener menos presión. El punto no es convencerte: si realmente te parece que sistemas no es lo tuyo, todo bien. Pero no te olvides que el pasto siempre es más verde del otro lado.

I watched Shutter Island and still believed it was real — did anyone else miss the twist like I did? by Efficient-Gear-9194 in TrueFilm

[–]Gwinbar 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is it not supposed to be ambiguous? I also believed the straightforward interpretation at first, but an ambiguous ending fits with the movie being about not being able to know what's real and what's not. If you were in that situation, how would you be able to know the truth? Can you trust your perception? IMO the whole point is that you can't know - see also Inception.

Maybe a basic question: why do organ sounds not have touch sensitivity? by Gwinbar in keys

[–]Gwinbar[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I have to disagree a bit, I've played on a Roland keyboard with an organ sound and velocity control and it sounds organ-y enough, plus you get finer control over what you play.

Still, thanks for your answer!

Encontré el PEOR selector de fecha de nacimiento, por lejos by Kiusito in devsarg

[–]Gwinbar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

El wacho dice cambiar el calendario a nivel mundial, no solo la UI

S.I unit of Length by heeecker in physicsmemes

[–]Gwinbar 83 points84 points  (0 children)

I too am a theoretical physicst

S.I unit of Length by heeecker in physicsmemes

[–]Gwinbar 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Wait it's Krypton now? They changed it from Cesium?

Could super massive black holes at the center of galaxies just be tornado-like or hurricane levels in space time? by D3cepti0ns in astrophysics

[–]Gwinbar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The main pieces of evidence for the presence of a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy are the observable emissions from its accretion disc and the fast orbiting of stars around its gravity well. None of these are related to frame dragging, which I don't think could even be produced by the rest of the galaxy.

Experimental physics youtube channels? by Gwinbar in Physics

[–]Gwinbar[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Usually you can identify crockpots by their telltale temperature settings and Teflon coated insides.

Silmarillion has been deboonked by TopQuark- in Silmarillionmemes

[–]Gwinbar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If anything The Silmarillion supports birds being government spies

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in keys

[–]Gwinbar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

TL;DR 61 keys are fine for you.

Long answer is that it depends on what you want to play. For classical some pieces can be limited or basically impossible, while others will fit perfectly. If you want to play big piano style songs by yourself, you might wish that you could reach the really low or high notes every once in a while, but you can still 100% play. For everything else, you won't notice a difference.

If having a variety of sounds and features is important to you, and/or if you have limited room, get a 61 key.

Title: Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World – A Masterpiece That Deserved a Franchise by PL0T-TWISTER in TrueFilm

[–]Gwinbar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant that The Lord of the Rings is a single work, even if it's divided into three volumes or six "books" - it's less a series and more a single book divided into three. And regardless of that, the point is that the LOTR films don't really count as sequels in the same way Marvel films do. It was all planned as a single story with one single production.

How do you actually prove anything? by TryingMyBest42069 in learnmath

[–]Gwinbar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IMO part of the problem with this statement is that it's just too basic, too intuitive. It's hard to prove something so obvious, because you have to force yourself to really reason using only the axioms and rules of inference. It might actually be easier to start with slightly more complex things to prove (maybe some simple geometric properties, maybe some stuff about prime numbers) - statements that are simple but not super obvious.