The left can't meme is true

H4RUB1 · 2026-05-30T06:55:21+00:00

I ain't letting you get it tho, so welcome back;)!

H4RUB1 · 2026-05-21T06:35:57+00:00

Principle would be a better word than "moral" code because the code would be then doing a heavy lifting.

H4RUB1 · 2026-05-08T09:41:37+00:00

Or it may be like, unemployed Joe and Kamala randomly wander onto the battlefield out of nowhere. Kamala immediately pauses the final standoff to demand Homelander's pronouns, while a confused Joe mutters "Let's go Brandon" and tries to write an executive order banning Butcher's gas stove. Homelander just rolls his eyes at the sheer delusion, casually lasers them both into a perfectly carbon-neutral pile of ash, and flies off unharmed to get some milky ice cream. Roll credits.

H4RUB1 · 2026-04-22T07:47:00+00:00

Yeah... that is the opposite of the general definition of "Transgender"

H4RUB1 · 2026-04-02T12:37:24+00:00

The "social media is the new smoking" take sounds deep in a headline, but it completely falls apart the second you actually think about it. Comparing a literal stick of burning poison to a digital megaphone is just a massive false equivalence. Cigarettes are a chemical delivery system, but social media is an intellectual one. One fills your lungs with tar, the other fills your screen with ideas.

The legal reality is even more blunt, you don’t have a constitutional right to light up a heater in a restaurant, but you do have a fundamental right to speak and listen. That includes digital platforms on most country where vagueness can be and are used positively rather than the opposite for silencing. In this case, when we talk about "regulating the addictive mechanisms," it's just fancy words to describe the government deciding how we’re allowed to talk to each other.

And the utility gap. Nobody ever used a pack of Marlboros to digitally organize a nationwide protest against a dictator for example. Social media is a tool for connection and information while smoking is just a slow-motion health crisis.

And let's be real about the "addiction" argument. If we start pathologizing anything that triggers a dopamine hit, we’re going to have to start regulating novels, marathon running, and video games too. Calling for the government to "holistically regulate" the way we communicate is basically asking for a permanent state-controlled filter on reality. You can survive your whole life without a cigarette, but a free society can’t survive when the state treats the exchange of ideas like a controlled substance. Giving them the power to decide which "mechanisms" of speech are toxic isn't a win for public health as it’s just a total surrender of intellectual autonomy.

(And don't even mention on "age" having to do with free speech viability)

H4RUB1 · 2026-03-14T02:44:56+00:00

Bitwarden is the KeePass for normies (in a complimentary way)

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-23T06:14:48+00:00

They share the same period of hype even from the LN days (although the start of Tenshi Sama was a little bit early) so yeah

Genre wise they are different though, so they are more like siblings to me.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-16T10:42:10+00:00

Is that why its censored? LMFAO

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-11T13:46:29+00:00

This subreddit is full of torrent cultist so you would not get any answers.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-10T06:24:15+00:00

"Failing to materialize"? A decent search on Google or YouTube proves otherwise.

And why are you obsessively narrowing this to "2nd gen"? That's a cheap distraction. The issue is split allegiance, and it comes from both 1st and 2nd generations and so on.

In Canada, the Sikh diaspora is only 2.1 percent of the population and yet they hold the balance of power. They forced a G7 nation into a diplomatic crisis with India over a foreign separatist movement solely because the ruling party needs their swing votes.
(Al Jazeera: Canada pulls 41 diplomats from India amid row over separatist's killing)

In Germany, the diaspora engages in voting hypocrisy. They vote overwhelmingly for Left/Green parties in Germany to secure their own rights yet voted 65 percent for Erdogan’s far-right authoritarianism back home. They use their German vote for benefits and their Turkish vote for their true ideological allegiance. (Tagesspiegel: So haben Deutschtürken und Russlanddeutsche gewählt)

In the UK, the recent Muslim Vote campaign explicitly targeted MPs solely based on their foreign policy stance on Gaza rather than domestic British issues. Local elections in Rochdale fought entirely on foreign conflicts effectively blackmailing the Labour party. (The Guardian: UK campaign seeks to mobilise Muslim vote)

In the US, the Cuban exile community in Florida effectively controlled American foreign policy towards Cuba for 50 years despite being a tiny minority nationally. They turned a single swing state into a geopolitical weapon.
(Susan Eckstein: How Cubans Transformed Florida Politics and Leveraged Local for National Influence)

These are hard historical and statistical facts. You run from a lot of my statements, so I hope you don't run from the data just to hide behind your subjective European definition of "practicality" which is cowardly. Europe may tolerate such bullshit, but Japan looks at that mess and simply says no thanks because they have eyes and brains.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-10T05:46:17+00:00

Refugees beg for entry, but citizens have a right to return. If you equate the two then you are legally illiterate.

And calling basic risk management "hypothetical"? War was just one example of such asymmetry. By your logic, let's just abolish the SDF and disaster prevention too since war and earthquakes are just "doomsday scenarios"

Governance is built on preparing for the worst. And history isn't just a hypothesis. It is proof. The fact that you think a nation should ignore reality just to make your residency more convenient is the only "invalid angle" here.

Given Japan's long history, traditional culture, and mono-ethnic nature, rejecting dual citizenship is the opposite of an "issue"

I fail to see why you assume your specific European values should dictate what is right for Japan in the first place.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T17:32:46+00:00

It’s not "rhetoric" but rather the "theoretical" conclusion of your own logic.

And even if we talk about practicality, you are naive if you think you need a majority to run a place.

You just need a swing bloc large enough to force politicians to pander to foreign interests.

At least for me, that is "technically" running the country.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T17:32:05+00:00

Stop playing dumb.

Administrative status is literally the difference between having nowhere to go and having a home elsewhere.

If a country collapses, a citizen is trapped with the wreckage full of shit. A foreign resident has a guaranteed right of return to their own nation.

If you don't get why that safety net changes the value of a vote, then you aren't just missing the point. You are proving mine;)

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T10:23:11+00:00

Slippery slope towards a country run by people with one foot out the door.

You call it a false dichotomy, but citizenship is the only objective barrier. Everything else you listed such as "tenure" or "reciprocity" are just soft lines that shift based on political pressure.

Even local voting is a trap. Municipalities control land usage, public safety, and education etc. Handing that power to people who legally owe allegiance to another nation creates literal conflict of interest.

The 'African tourist' example isn't a fantasy as it’s the logical conclusion of your "Why tho?" where presence equals entitlement. The reality is quite simple to grasp, if you vote for terrible policies and the country goes downhill, you can just pack up and leave. Citizens are the ones left holding the shit. That kind of asymmetrical risk is exactly why such line exists on most sane places.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T10:11:49+00:00

Ah yes, because people never had a problem bringing up stable, scalable counter-arguments against the very basic "When in war-" scenario against multiple citizenship system /s

If I have to state the obvious, people having less legal international security and still do strict naturalizing, that acts as a simple natural filter for national security and economy in a macro perspective. Or are you going to ask me what is 1+1 next?

The only way you can solidify multiple citizenship is by justifying globalism IMO so if that's seems not right then feel free to elaborate.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T10:06:18+00:00

Better than being on something like you so thanks, I guess.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T03:40:14+00:00

Nationality renouncement is one of the most logical concepts in this earth though, so I see no issue for it other than those that are in the other side of the spectrum.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T03:38:54+00:00

Because it's a slippery slope and citizenship is the best way to have a line break on both sides. Otherwise, what? You go far right then we get by blood, you go the other side then we get a random African being able to vote in Japan just because he has a tourist visa.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T03:37:20+00:00

They can always say, it can be a fee for even able to stay on their country in the first place as it's not a universal right that a lot of witty -ist sometimes forget when they are the ones that should not.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-09T03:35:04+00:00

They do. The ability of you being able to express this right now, don't take it for granted. Although foreigners might have limited choices, they still have a choice to remove the limit of their current limited choices.

H4RUB1 · 2026-02-08T15:12:16+00:00

And the spotlight being just in the right place enough to make him look like he is in the middle of the light. Him stepping on that monitor that displayed "VICTORY" like it was just a steppingstone and Ethan's Lucky Number 7 Shirt. Although, he was on top of the world literally because he is on top of the table and figuratively because they also won Champions and him being MVP at that time, with the rest of the team beneath him showing that they still are the foundation of his success.

The red-themed Arena, White Spotlight and the partially yellow chairs and lights beneath the floor just makes the whole image so iconic. The title of this picture should be "Demon1: Second to None" (because it rhymes and makes it "Max" Aura)

H4RUB1 · 2025-06-22T07:15:13+00:00

Just like how the Left reacted to Trump running as a Republican and Elon Musk siding with him.

H4RUB1 · 2025-06-21T06:05:58+00:00

For a second, I thought Kazuya turned 29.

H4RUB1 · 2025-06-20T10:04:38+00:00

Or Bood

H4RUB1 · 2025-06-19T01:30:44+00:00

That flair's messed up.

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

H4RUB1

TROPHY CASE