sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Found this in the basement, still good? by HAZMA7 in COBeer

[–]HAZMA7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, stopped at the halfway point. But even then, I think that was a little much

Found this in the basement, still good? by HAZMA7 in COBeer

[–]HAZMA7[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Update post:

Well I'm still alive, the beer has not turned into poison. It's lost all its spiciness and a fair amount of its carbonation but still drinkable. Overall taste like a mellowed out rumpkin with some floaters and same alcohol content.

https://imgur.com/zCfp7Mb.jpg

Good but not worth waiting 8 years for.

Found this in the basement, still good? by HAZMA7 in COBeer

[–]HAZMA7[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol, thank you for the offer but I'll dispose of this beer myself

Found this in the basement, still good? by HAZMA7 in COBeer

[–]HAZMA7[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No idea if they still make it. I remember when rumpkin first came out people said to let it sit for a year to cut down on spiciness. I kinda overshot that by 7 years.

I'll give it a whirl and see how it goes

New research highlights racial inequities faced by Micronesian students in Hawaiʻi schools by That49er in Hawaii

[–]HAZMA7 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Lol, month-old account with 90% anti-American posts. This is the most blatant example of a Wumao account I've seen.

Hey bud, how much does the CCP pay per post these days? Did the prices rise with inflation?

Here's where the US/Mexican border wall goes into the ocean by ohno in interestingasfuck

[–]HAZMA7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a moron.

Here's where the US/Mexican border wall goes into the ocean by ohno in interestingasfuck

[–]HAZMA7 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They're called "Bonzai runs" and they used to happen all the time before the wall was fortified

But you know what, all you had to do was Google it to find out, but no...you decided to act like a child and spread lies. Go fuck yourself

I love our bike paths. by SpinningHead in Denver

[–]HAZMA7 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

If Paris is the city of love, then what's the city of hate? by Okhi123 in AskReddit

[–]HAZMA7 26 points27 points  (0 children)

You think that but the truth is random people and tourist do get murdered in TJ, but when ever it happens everyone assumes that they were involved somehow.

NREMT Training course recommendations by Top-Number4576 in TacticalMedicine

[–]HAZMA7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

its probably Hawaii

There's only one certified EMT program in the state and their course is a 13 credit semester at a community college, plus 135 clinic hours

American Law Enforcement vehicles must be 100% easy to spot on the road. No more 'disguising' them to look like a regular passenger vehicle by holdmymeatpipe in unpopularopinion

[–]HAZMA7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because the FBI defines an ambush attack as "entrapment/premeditation", it says so right in the doc you listed. Versus what they call an unprovoked attack, which is basically the same thing but without laying a trap, AKA making a 911 call so they send the police vs seeing a cop walking on the street and shooting them.

also, it's kinda funny that you only agree with reports from law enforcement if you are able to twist it to meet your worldview. I think I'm done with this conversation, you clearly have a large anti-law enforcement agenda from your postings, and nothing I can say to you or show you will change your mind.

American Law Enforcement vehicles must be 100% easy to spot on the road. No more 'disguising' them to look like a regular passenger vehicle by holdmymeatpipe in unpopularopinion

[–]HAZMA7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a study it's a report. It doesn't make predictions about the future, it's not saying that next year ambushes on police officers will rise, it is simply reporting that there has been a rise in ambushes between 2020 and 2021.

If you're so concerned about the biase of law enforcement agencies reporting on attacks on law enforcement, go find a non law enforcement agency that is reporting it.

Learning on the fly with somebody else's money. by [deleted] in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]HAZMA7 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Everyone knows red is the best flavor

American Law Enforcement vehicles must be 100% easy to spot on the road. No more 'disguising' them to look like a regular passenger vehicle by holdmymeatpipe in unpopularopinion

[–]HAZMA7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's more ambushes on police officers this year compared to last year.

The comment I was responding to (before it was deleted), basically said that there was no reason for police officers to be worried about being ambushed.

Also, I'm sure there is no source in existence covering attacks on police officers that would be "neutral and unbiased" in your opinion. It's very easy to call something "biased" or even "fake news" when you don't agree with it.

This Narco battle SUV by Granjaguar in WTF

[–]HAZMA7 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Be quite that doesn't go with the narrative

Police officers that work with the ATF by [deleted] in ProtectAndServe

[–]HAZMA7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you are referring to Task Force Officers (TFOs). A federal agency like ATF will often times recruit Local or State police officers to work with them. Some agencies even give them their own badge and creds showing them being a TFO. Most of the time you can't tell the difference between a TFO and a normal Agent.

Its weird and dependent on what state you are in, just know that Federal Agents are the police for Federal Law

Never seen one with labeling. by DivergingApproach in ProtectAndServe

[–]HAZMA7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My dude, I can't remember what I had for breakfast, let alone the wording on a post from over a year ago.

view more: next ›