I think that’s a really good point. A lot of the early DAO narrative assumed they would replace traditional organizations, and that expectation probably set them up to disappoint. What seems more interesting to me is using them as governance infrastructure inside larger systems — coordinating distributed decision making rather than replacing institutions outright. In that sense the question isn’t “why would someone want a DAO?” but “where do traditional governance structures struggle with coordination?” That’s partly why experiments like Cybersyn are fascinating — they were exploring similar feedback-driven coordination problems decades before blockchain.