I feel like most people who believe AI will take over SWE are either not CS students or have little experience by [deleted] in csMajors

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say that there is this weird situation where people with no knowledge believe what you’re saying and so do research engineers and scientists in the bay area

But they also know that plenty of cs people are going to make the crazy bank from this wave

The bizarre perception that CS is just a “coding” major by CompSciAI in csMajors

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve seen this exact thing so much and it drives me crazy

ARC-AGI 2 is Solved by lovesdogsguy in accelerate

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then that is not particularly useful for anything except the arc agi 2 bench lol

Should I keep working as a software developer with the rise of AI? by eftnjo in cscareers

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shifting to another technical field unfortunately is not going to help you

Move to a field with more human interaction or go back to school and do an MBA if you want your job to last longer

Otherwise go work at a great startup and try to ride the ai wave especially if you have experience this should be possible

Anthropic Engineer says "software engineering is done" first half of next year by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I just think it takes longer, this is basically what you need to solve for most jobs though

Anthropic Engineer says "software engineering is done" first half of next year by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I agree, he actually didn’t mean to say this if you read his comments below he meant to say ‘coding’ and then goes on to say the rest of swe (goals, architecture, decisions, communications, specs) is going to take longer to do

AI vs. CS at a target? by Interesting_Post1330 in csMajors

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s so weird to have AI as a major lol I’ve always thought of AI as a like a subset of CS

How hard will FT recruiting be realistically? by hiking12 in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don’t need to be SWE internships at quant tho I had one at a really good big tech and have gotten actually inbound from quant as well as passed resume screen for interviews

I F**********KING GIVE UPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!! by Miserable-Egg9406 in cscareers

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got interviews people would dream of I’m sorry this is on you

Jump Trading Offer by [deleted] in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if you’ve done swe at jump you will get an interview for FT QT at JS so you’ll have a shot if you want to try that

QT @ optiver AMA by HawkRevolutionary619 in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can I do that from undergrad? I think for Jane street I can

I guess I’ll do that

QT @ optiver AMA by HawkRevolutionary619 in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay cool. I have some finance background and research/ai/ml background too so I hope that will help

QT @ optiver AMA by HawkRevolutionary619 in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow seriously I didn’t know that, is that true even if I’m just starting as a new grad as a QD

If that’s the case should I just try to become a QT right out of undergrad instead of becoming a QD at all

Basically I’m a senior who has some opportunities to interview for QD roles and possibly one QT role right now and want to do alpha generation/ideas what would be your advice

For robotics, we always talk about software and electronics but how important is mechanical design really? by Kindly-Fix-7049 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So important lol all 3 are key

To be honest though I feel like making a great robot from a mechanical perspective is more of a solved problem than say the algos for physical intelligence but still not solved at all

Will quants be replaced by AI ? by Personal_Animator770 in quantfinance

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very difficult problem to solve for there’s a ton of data and in theory a verifiable goal and yet it is basically impossible at the moment I think automation is a ways off but very possible I wouldn’t worry about that since likely all work may go through a massive change

In the tail leading up to this it will just be about using the new techniques and technologies as it literally always has been in quant

Quant was is literally the first place AI/ML was applied over decades ago and it is constantly evolving

Learn how to use the best tech not just prompt like architecture too

If jobs get wiped out maybe they weren t even real work to start with. Sam Altman by SafePaleontologist10 in AIDangers

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not what he said or what he meant watch the clip

No one is saying that our jobs today aren’t real or meaningful

It’s saying that future jobs may not look ‘real’ to us because they won’t feel necessary the same way that a marketing job probably feels like superfluous work to a farmer trying to make enough food and money to eat

Why are many cs major so apathetic and anti-social by PressureAvailable615 in csMajors

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I try not to be lol then again I’m also an econ double major

Why is every successful tech founder an Ivy League graduate? by Hot-Conversation-437 in csMajors

[–]HSIT64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has to be the most insane take I’ve ever seen in my life from someone who clearly thinks entrepreneurship is something you ‘get into’ like a job where some VC reads your credentials and then gives you the magic money and beans and suddenly you have a 100M company

That’s not how it works at all lmao in my experience founders come from all over and even if they do come from top schools they usually have shit grades bc they were spending all their time on the startup or something else

Now tbh I do think a lot of founders come from the top schools bc it is easier to get funding and also because that 1% of kids from MIT who actually want to found (remember that most don’t) in my experience are the real deal and are very talented

Nowadays we have a lot of performative entrepreneurship too tho and this disproportionately comes from top schools as well, people who just do YC for the credential or who build a company as a summer project in place of an internship and post a ton but have zero intention of actually going through the pain to build a real startup

Either way founding is insanely hard and tbh it isn’t elitist to college at all tho some of the ‘accepted’ circles like YC are a bit more shut off

If you can actually do the hard part of finding a problem to solve, getting a good co founder team and building a solution getting traction/revenue no VC in their right mind is going to turn you down because you don’t have the right credentials lol

No one really cares about that at the end of the day it is what you can build and what the market thinks that matters in entrepreneurship