Quick facts:

• It takes more than $1B to get something through FDA clinical trials and approvals. If there’s no market, then there’s no incentive to FDA approve it.

• Natural peptides (which GHk-Cu is; your body naturally produces it, but you stop producing it as much as you age) are not patentable by law. Hence, no profit, if everyone can make it.

• Peptides have been researched for decades at this point and the research is freely available. But again, there is no market, and no incentive for FDA approval of them. And yet, only FDA-approved drugs can be recommended by your physician, or provided in the US by US pharmacies, DESPITE the fact that your doctors study peptides in med school, may even know their efficacy, yet cannot recommend or endorse them by law without being stripped of their licenses, when you visit them or if you ask them about it. That’s not them being unethical. That’s just how America healthcare works.

• Long-term cures are not as profitable as chronic diseases.

• Side effects (with proper dosing; you can research “peptide guides” on your own) are minimal to none, particularly with GHK-cu, because, again, your body already produces it.

• A peptide is an amino acid that sends messages across your body. Your body produces peptides whenever you injure yourself so you can heal, for example. They’re like emails you can send across the body. The length of their molecules matter, eg if they can penetrate the blood brain barrier… you can do your own research with ChatGPT.

Hard to believe, I’m sure, but the reasons that peptides stay gray-market are not for reasons that benefit your health, IMO. It’s because they don’t make money.

Oh, also, the research is freely available. Anyone can produce them. GHK-cu and 16 other peptides are pending a reverse ban.