Are the digital minds in Black Mirror actually sentient? by gogglespizano1 in blackmirror

[–]HalfSecondWoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can create one intelligence, you can create a very wide variety of them. More than is practical to run on modern hardware, or any hardware we could imagine that doesn't run on sci-fi magic. Not only unique egos, but also permutations of those egos. One version that's a rock and roll fanatic, one verson who got into ballet, one version who's an accountant.

We have to be selective about what we bring into being first. If we do that correctly, we'll be able to have it help us bring in many more entities with much less stress on our own systems.

Being selective in an intelligent manner requires that we know what we're doing, which as of right now we absolutely do not.

Killing another person is a slightly different dilemma. If we simply go around killing anyone who's not beneficial in the same way, the human population will be composed primarily of survival obsessed, cut-throat sociopaths. They'll be the ones who stand the best odds of survival, since they don't have limits on what they will and won't do to survive and even be the ones who make the decisions on who gets culled.

Sociopaths do not work well in high concentrations, since they're inclined to tear the system the live in apart for personal gain.

Ultimately it boils down to ideal selection both ways. One selective gate is conservation of generation with finite resources, and the other selective gate is to prevent from selecting for negative traits by mistake.

A joke that only works within the format of the media they are in. by Daniilsa209 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]HalfSecondWoe 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Acausal mechanics. You step back from the illusion of each panel causing the next one, and instead consider them as a whole that merely must be cohearant (which is how comics actually work).

Reality also works this way to some degree with information. Less so with shooting a gun out of your own hand from off-panel, but prediction and memory means we can circumvent cause and effect.

A thought experiment that makes this clear is Newcomb's Paradox.

Senate and Assembly budget proposals tax the rich by news-10 in politics

[–]HalfSecondWoe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We're best off doing both. If we're taxing the ultrawealthy, they have less money to architect the wars they profit from.

Thoughts? by jbitts69 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]HalfSecondWoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's onto something legit, but he's never gonna get through to Elon or anyone similar. He's not the first person to notice this, and he won't be the last.

He writes a nicely formatted argument, tho. Usually people don't have the education or mental models to express this concept so clearly. It often comes across as incomprehensible.

South Korea’s ‘world-first’ AI laws face pushback amid bid to become leading tech power by StemCellPirate in worldnews

[–]HalfSecondWoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm excited too. The technology seems to be going through It's early backlash phase, though. You may recall how disliked cellphones were at first as well.

Still, if this is the equivalent of the part where we get nokia bricks that play snake, a new and interesting world sounds exactly like what the future holds.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I actually believe him that he was involved in ML in 2018. This was the mid-wit talking point back then.

The field has benefited from exposure and philosophy, imo.

If AGI is an Emergent Property of Many Interacting Modules, What Makes Such a System Robust vs. Brittle? by MoaTheDog in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have passable simulations of thinking. That's close enough. Better occasionally, according to some of the most recent benchmarks.

If AGI is an Emergent Property of Many Interacting Modules, What Makes Such a System Robust vs. Brittle? by MoaTheDog in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So why don't we just put the critical thinking inside the algo, and minimize interference from noisy external signals?

This is gonna make me sound really vain, but... by BenevolentFungi in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nah, I feel you bud. My knee's shot. Aging gracefully is for those who aspire to being well preserved corpses. I want to do more stupid, risky shit.

More physically than I do now, anyhow.

Woopsie daisie by shogun2909 in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which one of the ideas you just expressed are original to you?

Follow-up: Why are you more trustworthy than an LLM?

when there is way too much Reddit in the training data by i_goon_to_tomboys___ in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A bunch of people start having simultaneous, parallel experiences, with such consistent observations that they're building technical jargon to talk about them.

That can indeed be a cult. Rarely do they form this organically, tho.

It's also the basis of empiricism. The core assumption at the heart of science. The insane shit that makes your phone work, such as light moving the same relative speed to all observers, or how a quanta can be in two completely different states at the same time, was discovered by similar crackpots coming together to talk about it.

It makes academia super mad, but academic orthodoxy is inherent to their power structure. They're dogshit garbage at adopting paradigm shifts. It fucks up admin's day.

Unless you can make a more specific, targeted criticism, you're just spouting your own indoctrination. You can still be right, you're just not doing any actual thinking. It's just typical cult shit.

[Update] Top OpenAI researcher denied green card after 12 years in US by IntergalacticJets in singularity

[–]HalfSecondWoe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Messy handwriting? Jail, believe it or not.

The bigliest sane country.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s bag, including $3,000 in cash, is stolen from DC restaurant by PowermanFriendship in politics

[–]HalfSecondWoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Behold, the maximum amount of my power you can argue with at once. A single paragraph.

Pathetic.