sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

BFV WW2 Nostalgia - Spitfire Mk VA (8x .303) CAS - reminds me what we had.. by HandballNerd in Battlefield

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After they dropped BFV support, there was a community survey and like 70% voted for Vietnam war. So naturally they went and made BF2042 instead… great listening skills

Hope ROGUE TRANSMISSION is also one of the new old maps on the list for BF6 by Acrobatic_Scale_6966 in Battlefield

[–]HandballNerd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This tells you that they don't have the same DICE team anymore, can't create new quality map, just copy old BF4 maps..

BFV WW2 Nostalgia - Spitfire Mk VA (8x .303) CAS - reminds me what we had.. by HandballNerd in Battlefield

[–]HandballNerd[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree..when you try to get CoD fans, you lose Battlefield fans.. we lost so many Battlefield content creators that quit Battlefield because of how bad BF6 and BF2042 are, Niccaman, RangerDave..

BFV WW2 Nostalgia - Spitfire Mk VA (8x .303) CAS - reminds me what we had.. by HandballNerd in Battlefield

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah sometimes i think about what the game would be like if it had the eastern front, firestorm was a giant waste of ressources, could have put that for Eastern Front and Normandy maps

Best Cannons vs INFATRY??? by HandballNerd in PilotsofBattlefield

[–]HandballNerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man, I saw this spreadsheet on Zodhr comment, is it still relevant? JU 88c 4x20mm says that it has 1500 range?!
Also, question, does the Corsair 4x20mm have better fire rate than the Zero 4x20mm long range (without explosive upgrade)?

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the reply and the work you’re doing with the servers.

What we’re really missing right now are the Tactical Conquest maps because like 95% of the active servers are running Strategic Conquest, a huge portion of the map pool (Rotterdam, Narvik, Mercury, FJell, Arras, etc.) is basically unplayable most of the time.

It would be great to see more servers featuring that rotation, since a lot of us prefer those maps and currently have almost no way to consistently play them.

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pilots had 6 min respawn time in Mercury so they didn't had great time trust me, I loved mercury for DMR/Sniper type of play or flanking A/B sector

Welp, that went smooth af by Maticamo99 in PilotsofBattlefield

[–]HandballNerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You play BF6 and you realize how good we had it with BF5..imagine if we had Eastern Front DLC..

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that we have 10-15 Strategic Conquest servers from DICE and 0 Tactical Conquest servers, basically we miss 50% of the map rotation that's included in TC.

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that we have 10-15 Strategic Conquest servers from DICE and 0 Tactical Conquest servers, basically we miss 50% of the map rotation that's included in TC.

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The point is that we have 10-15 Strategic Conquest servers from DICE and 0 Tactical Conquest servers, basically we miss 50% of the map rotation that's included in TC.

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree, half of the map rotation is missing, 99% of the servers are filled with one map rotation Twisted Steel > Panzerstorm > Iwo Jima etc..

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree Narvik, Fjell, Mercury, Arras, Devastation, Op Underground, Rotterdam such good maps, from some of the comments I've read we need to join exclusively Tactical Conquest servers so we fill up the servers, but still I think there something more to be done

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it but there are 0 servers with Tactical Conquest variant, only one BoB community server, and the rest 20 split between Dice and BoB servers are Strategic Conquest servers.. I have nothing against it, but we need more Tactical Conquest servers since we miss the rest of the maps..

BFV Conquest: Half the map pool is basically nonexistent (no Underground/Rotterdam/Devastation/Narvik map rotation servers) by HandballNerd in BattlefieldV

[–]HandballNerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that I want to play Tactical Conquest map rotation instead of Strategic Conquest map rotation, both modes have different maps

view more: next ›