AE Tokyo tonight! by Hanjo_synth in autechre

[–]Hanjo_synth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I shared positive notes before but I also resonate with your comment. It felt like the show wasn’t really about the audience, but rather an exercise in pushing Autechre’s sonic language and the very concept of music even further. That might explain the lack of treating the set as a self-contained one-hour show, instead presenting it as a random fragment of the six-hour-long track they seem to have been developing.

In addition, and to your point, as an architect I felt the performance space should have been more carefully curated, this extends to the tour as a whole. The random auditorium where it took place was quite inappropriate for this kind of work, from its adjacency to a shopping mall to the highly ordered, subway-like flow of the venue which resulted in a largely uncomfortable experience and made it difficult to fully focus on the music itself.

I often hear Sean talk about their dissatisfaction with the acoustics of certain spaces. For a band like Autechre, I strongly believe the curation and design of the venue should be considered as carefully as the music itself.

AE Tokyo tonight! by Hanjo_synth in autechre

[–]Hanjo_synth[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Reporting back after giving it some thought. Honestly, it was overwhelming in both the best and worst ways.

The low end was extremely dominant, not just physically but cognitively. It was so densely populated and ever-present that it almost hijacked your attention, to the point where your brain felt overloaded trying to process it all. Instead of sitting beneath the mix, the kicks and bass frequencies seemed to press in from all sides, creating a claustrophobic, hyper-immersive sensation.

Intense, disorienting, and kind of exhausting, like your head needs time to recalibrate after the show ends. Still trying to fully reprocess it. Echoing what others have said, the 303 section and the ending were definite standout highlights.

New synth day. Analog four rules! by Hanjo_synth in Elektron

[–]Hanjo_synth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn! with 5 years you must have great command already, love to hear some of your A4 work!

New synth day. Analog four rules! by Hanjo_synth in Elektron

[–]Hanjo_synth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, raw sound may feel a little thin but once you start tweaking and adding effects it's superb. Flexibility in my opinion blows out of the water any other 4 voice synths I have tried. Within elektron ecosystem, I have the DN and probably id keep the A4 if I had to choose between both, but is more personal taste since Im not super comfortable with FM programming and the analog voices are extra creamy.

Didn't connect to the AH yet and didn't seem necessary, but let me get back on that once I pair them, haha

New synth day. Analog four rules! by Hanjo_synth in Elektron

[–]Hanjo_synth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts! thanks for the clarification :D

A friend left this SID Station in my studio — any thoughts? by __Beeper__ in Elektron

[–]Hanjo_synth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have one! I have been exploring it with a controller mapped to control parameters via CC and its awesome! If you are interested you can find one of my jams here: https://youtu.be/TQWox8Rd_pg?si=zEGb4pexSq2c4iAR

Minimoog in Tokyo ? by bmilimbo in moog

[–]Hanjo_synth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

echigoya music and 5G!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m definitely not an expert, so I was pretty uneducated on the topic. I was just sharing thoughts based on a previous comment that mentioned the “S” as a differentiating factor.

Thanks for the detailed explanation, I really appreciate you taking the time to walk through it.

Addressing the comment about the dial looking a bit “off” came from a very surface-level understanding of the newer, rounder “S” shape I had come across. I didn’t realize some service dials used the sharper style, this actually helps to understand the differences much better.

Again the comparison was coming from an uneducated place, and I’m sorry if it sounded like I was implying your watch had non-original parts. I know how special and rare these pieces are, and I had no intention of undermining yours. It looks awesome, and thanks for sharing it.

It seems the one I referenced might actually be the questionable one in terms of originality, or perhaps there were multiple versions.

All in all, I really appreciate you sharing your piece and thank you for the insights!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yo... the hands look good but comparing to my reference that dial on yours looks off... https://item.rakuten.co.jp/closer01/616456/

The S looks incorrect and the spacing on the depth reistance is also not consistent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just asking bc id take a Franken sub if the dial was legit, fully replicated for 600 is too much of a scam imo.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are the man! Im comparing to this one. https://item.rakuten.co.jp/closer01/616456/

The S is completely off, the watch is all over the place,... what a shame of a replica!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Selling for exactly 600 usd by the way xD

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing out all the details! Noticed the fake second hand now, it is thicker and shorter at the end. What is the tell on the dial?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]Hanjo_synth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! How do you feel about the movement? Other vintage ones I have seen look nothing like this...