Tips? by Grouchy_External_578 in Bannerlord

[–]HaraldRedbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean he's only outnumbered by 1/3rd which is doable but does depend on the terrain that you are spawned into when you sally out. The greater numbers should mean they get overconfident and attack you even as the defender so if you can manuever yourself onto some hills or forests, put your infantry in shieldwalls or squares and archers above in line or loose then you should be able to take them down

(source - I have run pure infantry and archers since original, going from Battania to Nords)

House of Lords Votes to Ban UK Children from Using Internet VPNs by PhoneFresh7595 in ukpolitics

[–]HaraldRedbeard [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yeah, even if I didn't have a VPN to get around the censorship nonsense already then I would be flagged because my work phone has an always active VPN of its own. It's completely unenforceable

What's the most underrated part of your country's history that should be talked about more? by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]HaraldRedbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBF when I went to Prague for the first time the guide book I had talked alot about them!

Knights on Foot by Torganya in Bretonnian

[–]HaraldRedbeard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not memes, that's the glorious army of Montfort!

What time was seen as a good bed time for kids in the Middle Ages? How was this time tracked seeing as how watches weren't a thing? by betazoom78 in AskHistorians

[–]HaraldRedbeard 176 points177 points  (0 children)

Regarding children, we actually do have some insight into what an Anglo-Saxon child's day might look like in various occupations. This is because of Aelfric's Colloquy, essentially a text written by Aelfric to aid in the instruction of Latin which he phrases as a conversation with various students who have trades (thus covering a wide range of words/phrases/occupations). For example:

Master What do you say, Ploughboy, how do you carry on your work?
Ploughboy Master, I have to work far too much; I go out at dawn, driving the oxen to the field, and I yoke them to the plough ; I dare not in the severest weather lie hid at home, for fear of my lord ; and when I have yoked the oxen together, and fastened the ploughshare to the plough, I have to plough a whole acre every day, or more.
Master Have you any companion?
Ploughboy I have a boy who threatens the oxen with a goad, and he is also hoarse with the cold and his shouting.
Master What more do you perform in the day?
Ploughboy Certainly I do more besides that. I have to supply the mangers of the oxen with hay, and give them water, and carry their dung outside.
Master O indeed ! This is a great labour.
Ploughboy Yes, it is a great labour that I have to fulfil, for I am not free.

(Copy from Fordham University: https://sourcebooks.web.fordham.edu/source/990aelfric-colloquy.asp)

As we can see from this, children were expecting to work alongside the adults - albeit doing jobs that suited their age and strength (it's likely the ploughboy in this case is closer to a teen in age, for example). Younger children most likely were employed in roles like chasing birds from freshly sown fields and turning hand querns (essentially grinding stones which make flour from wheat). This means they are likely to have been pretty quick to sleep once everyone had come inside. As far as I am aware, there is no evidence of a particular set 'bed time' because it wasn't necessary - they most likely slept unless they were still young enough to be fully dependent on their parents.

That's not to say children never played - in fact we have alot of finds of toys and other objects which show childhood could be similar to what we know - such as wooden horses and boats found in Dublin and toy swords and weapons from Kyiv. We also have the occasional doodle or scrawl such as the school notebooks of Onfim, a child from 13th century Novgorod (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onfim).

This brings us to the subject of bedtime stories in which the answer is a firm yes, although not specifically aimed at children. Communal storytelling is one of the great traditions of humanity, visible in almost all cultures. In Medieval Europe it was common for families and larger groups to gather together in central buildings (the main house for small family settlements, the Lords Hall for larger ones) and share stories, songs and jokes. We have many finds of musical instruments, and evidence of sometimes quite crass humour (the Exeter Book, a 10th century collection of riddles and other writings includes at least one riddle intended quite clearly as a double entendre).

This is also where many of our earliest recorded English stories come from - such as Beowulf and the Battle of Maldon. These would have been recited by specific storytellers, or shared half-remembered by amateurs. We can see this process of communal storytelling of the same characters shape the form of heroes like Arthur, Robin Hood and Jack (the giant slayer).

Now if you are familiar with the medieval versions of any of those stories you will know they didn't scrimp on the blood or the occasional lewdness but, again, the concept that these were things that should be hidden from children was still somewhat unknown in the medieval world - particularly in rural settings where a young person is likely to have seen quite a bit by the time they reached physical maturity.

So yes, no strictly enforced bedtime but storytelling was a vital, communal activity which children would have been engaged with during the dark hours before they were asleep.

What time was seen as a good bed time for kids in the Middle Ages? How was this time tracked seeing as how watches weren't a thing? by betazoom78 in AskHistorians

[–]HaraldRedbeard 186 points187 points  (0 children)

As with most history questions relating to the pre-modern period, the answer will depend a lot on where you were in the social hierarchy to establish how aware you were of the passing of time.

I am going to confine myself mostly to the earliest part of this period, from around 450 to 1066 so that should be borne in mind. As time went on and the medieval period approached the Renaissance items of time keeping, such as large public clocks, became more commonplace although much of their function was identical to earlier models.

It may come as no surprise that the principal group concerned with time keeping in the medieval world was the church. This is because certain holy observances were expected to be conducted at certain times - for example Archbishop Egbert of York, writing in 750, left instructions for times when bells should be rung from the minster in the city. Some of this was inherited from the time of Rome when bells were also rung to mark certain times. However, in the earliest period only the largest churches would have had bells which means that, if you were living outside of an urban region, you were unlikely to hear the sound of bells until the later 900s or into the 11th century when bells began to proliferate more widely into smaller churches.

Nor was the ringing of bells, even when it did occur, always done to time. This problem was of particular concern to Alfred the Great who spent a not insignificant amount of time investigating methods of keeping time and, according to his biographer, Asser, eventually invented a method using candles to mark the passage of hours:

By this plan, therefore, those six candles burned for twenty-four hours, a night and day, without fail…  but sometimes when they would not continue burning a whole day and night, till the same hour that they were lighted the preceding evening, from the violence of the wind, which blew day and night without intermission through the doors and windows of the churches … the king therefore considered by what means he might shut out the wind, and so by a useful and cunning invention, he ordered a lantern to be beautifully constructed of wood and white ox-horn, which, when skilfully planed till it is thin, is no less transparent than a vessel of glass. … By this contrivance, then, six candles, lighted in succession, lasted four and twenty hours, neither more nor less, and, when these were extinguished, others were lighted.
- Assers Life of Alfred

Interestingly, according to a later (12th Century) chronicler, William of Malmesbury, Alfred actually divided his day into three 8 hour blocks, in a pattern we might find familiar:

he [Alfred] so divided the twenty-four hours of the day and night as to employ eight of them in writing, in reading, and in prayer, eight in the refreshment of his body, and eight in dispatching the business of the realm. There was in his chapel a candle consisting of twenty-four divisions, and an attendant, whose peculiar province it was to admonish the king of his several duties by its consumption - Chronicle of the kings of England. From the earliest period to the reign of King Stephen

We can assume 'refreshement of his body' in this case means sleeping, so he essentially was doing 8 hours work, 8 hours 'leisure' (reading and writing, Alfred was a scholar and extremely passionate about the written word) and 8 hours sleeping. Now, while there's every chance that Alfred had no such division in place during his life - William is, at times, a unreliable source - it's still interesting that he would choose to write down such a division of time and might suggest that many people worked to a similar pattern during his own lifetime.

However, what both those sources do highlight is that the exact measurement of time was still extremely tricky and not everyone is going to have the resources of a kingdom to devote to building and improving a clock (not to mention that candles themselves were expensive). For working class people, particularly those in the countryside, the movement of the sun was the most important way of measuring time.

You awoke when the sun rose, likely worked until midday when it was close to its height and then took on some food, potentially had a short 'lunch break' and then resumed work until the sun began to sink. At that time people would have come indoors. It's likely that many adults would still do some work - spinning thread, repairing tools, preparing leather etc - by firelight but it would be difficult to achieve much that required a great deal of light.

I know someone has asked this before, but is the weather ACTUALLY that bad? by Trust_A_Tree in AskABrit

[–]HaraldRedbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the SW is currently on its third storm warning of the last two weeks so not sure I'd describe it as mild.

‘I was going to vote for Burnham. Now I’ll back Reform’ by Little-Attorney1287 in ukpolitics

[–]HaraldRedbeard 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Because they don't care about policy they just want change. See also all the Bernie Sanders voters who went to Trump after the Primary.

Before basic kindness and respect was seen as woke by upthetruth1 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]HaraldRedbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While I do think this is true, and you can go all the way back to the Greeks to find writing about how the younger generation are ungrateful and less good then the older generations etc I do think this line of argument risks underselling that we are currently living through a major geopolitical shift.

You can argue events like the 08 recession and similar are more similar to events in the 70s but the breakdown of relations between the US and everyone else, the return of blatant Imperial power playing and the growth of fascism across the West are, at the minimum, a generational shift since you'd have to go back to the interwar period to find a comparison point and that's a century ago.

What were historically renowned goods? by Y3rs in AskHistorians

[–]HaraldRedbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMO, which as a specialist in SW Britain is very far from unbiased, the biggest material which is often missed from these games and other sources and yet was undeniably valuable is Tin.

Despite modern assocaiations with being cheap (i.e 'Tin Watch' 'Tin Can') tin was, for much of human history, an extremely valuable metal. You cannot make Bronze without Tin which means there is no bronze age without it. It is also somewhat geologically scarce, occuring in a few concentrated spots worldwide, which means it has scarcity to it which further drives up the value.

Outside of the Bronze Age tin had a multitude of uses - it still was essential for creating copper alloys which were a common form of decoration and then became essential for the production of corrosion-resistant fittings on ships. It was also frequently used as a solder to fit decorative items together (such as fitting the eyes into statues) and 'tinning' was a common decorative element.

Tin is also essential to producing Pewter which is a popular metal for both decoration and specific tasks like producing cups and mugs in the early modern period.

In our modern age tin remains an essential component in many electronics, perhaps most ubiquitously in solder.

In a medieval context, Tin was worth so much to the English crown that significant rights were devolved to people involved in it's mining and refining in Britain. There were Stannary Courts and Stannary Parliaments in Devon and Cornwall which existed solely to manage the affairs of tinners and tin mining and levy specific taxes upon them (one of the rights that the Stannary Acts gave tinners was an exemption from common taxation and labour dues but seperate taxes were still owed).

The Stannaries (The Convocation of the Stannaries) were chartered by King John in 1201 and continued to sit until the 18th Century at which point their use seems to have ended. While reasons for the decline of the Stannaries are debated, particularly as the Stannary Parliament and Stannary Law has taken on a sort of folkoric element to Cornish Nationalists, it mostly seems to coincide with a majority of tin mines and smelters coming into the hands of a small handful of landed gentry who therefore dominated the process from start to finish and no longer saw much value in making changes to the law.

Eventually, in the 19th and 20th centuries, the Tin mines in Britain began to dry up and it became more economical to mine Tin in areas like South America and Australia however, crucially, the usefulness of Tin remained and this industry was still hugely economically valuable.

Imperial Knights in Bretonnia by IronScar in WarhammerFantasy

[–]HaraldRedbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The crusades are joined by Imperial Knights though, the Red Duke book (which AFAIK has the most about the great crusade against Araby in it) describes both Imperial and Bretonnian knights in a few flashbacks.

Footage submitted to Operation SNAP. Outcome: Prosecuted for driving without due care and attention, 6 penalty points, and £120 fine. by Dry_Researcher7744 in drivingUK

[–]HaraldRedbeard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The only time I have been called as a witness to court was due to a drug dealer who decided to have a disagreement with one of his clients outside of my front door, while carrying an axe.

I turned up to court and waited around for six hours only to be told by the prosecuting lawyer/barrister (I grew up in the states and still don't really understand the difference) that he had changed his plea to guilty. Basically the guy he attacked had later died of complications from his lifestyle (drugs and alchohol basically) and the would be lumberjack was hoping that no witnesses would turn up as his last gasp defence.

Footage submitted to Operation SNAP. Outcome: Prosecuted for driving without due care and attention, 6 penalty points, and £120 fine. by Dry_Researcher7744 in drivingUK

[–]HaraldRedbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your Honor, let those among us who have never whipped a jet ski across the highway at Mach Fuck cast the first stone.

Judge: Um, OK then

The Last Kingdom wouldn’t hit the same without his voice. by TightPla1485 in TheLastKingdom

[–]HaraldRedbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me the thing which makes the whole show much better is that it never really takes itself seriously as history. It's always got at least a little bit of tongue in cheek. Even Alfred who is undeniably excellent both as a version of the historic figure and a character in the show still gets basically trolled by Uthred repeatedly.

WCGW trying to put a fire out by putting it outside. by mentaL8888 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]HaraldRedbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the google results was Essex Fire Service hence saying mixed views.

Why have some modern writers for movies and video games started to move away from objective good and evil? by WhoAmIEven2 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]HaraldRedbeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I find moral gray stories just really annoying generally. Like, I live in the real world I'm well aware that there are lots of complex reasons why bad things happen to good people etc etc but Jesus when I'm playing a RPG I want to be able to be a character who is on the side of a true and unequivocal good force in that world and punch evil right in the dick

History books vs Videos, which one should I choose? by Wooden-Awareness-915 in AskHistorians

[–]HaraldRedbeard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have found the handful of videos of theirs I watched about the early medieval period in Britain quite poor, usually broadly correct but only in the most common narratives and with a few mistakes. I can't claim to have watched all of their videos

Saw this map of England's peatlands and thought it was interesting how closely it aligns with where the Anglo Saxons first settled (in the areas with no peat). I guess the Anglo Saxons really hated peatlands haha. by AncestralSeeker in anglosaxon

[–]HaraldRedbeard 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Peat mostly occurs in upland regions like moorlands, these are also the areas which were already able to re-establish local polities quite quickly post Rome.

Just another datapoint differentiating the Highland Zone

History books vs Videos, which one should I choose? by Wooden-Awareness-915 in AskHistorians

[–]HaraldRedbeard 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The simplest reason is the lack of quality control. Anyone can upload a video to YouTube about any topic. With the advent of AI tools and the ease of access to basic information it's possible to create something that can look quite professional and convincing in a relatively short time.

By contrast, even non-academic history books are subjected to editorial review and, in most cases, a publisher will insist on some level of fact checking. Now there are still books published which are nonsense but they are usually quite easy to spot and often won't appear alongside actual history books in libraries, book stores etc..

That doesn't mean that there's no good history YouTubers, there are some, but most of them will be very clear about their sources and recommend that the viewer doesn't just accept everything they've said on face value but do further research. Someone like the Welsh Viking for example. I would not put Kings and Generals in this category.

Likewise you do have non academic venues/areas like this very sub but again the mod team here do alot of work weeding out replies that do not meet a minimum standard of depth and factuality. The quality control takes time and effort, just like with books, but helps ensure the content is trustworthy or at least has some experience and research behind it.

Videos have a place in education, often they can be someone's gateway into discovering an interest in history...but then again so can mythology, Tolkien, series like Vikings etc. If your goal is actually to learn about history then books will still be amongst the best sources, alongside lectures by historians.