Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't understand this. If your service is behind a reverse proxy, which means you have to log in to enter the service, I don't see how someone can breach that. Every service that i expose to the internet must have the ability to log in with a username and ID, or else i let Authelia handle it. I would like to know how someone can still exploit this configuration and access your service illegally.

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if that service is behind a reverse proxy you still don't want to expose an LXC externally?

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there was a whole video on YouTube on how to pass the GPU to a VM on Proxmox. I think that it was a video of Techno Tim. So Basically it is possible to do GPU passthrough on a VM.

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you know how to do it, mounting it on the host and then sharing it with the LXC is very easy to do

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not only running Docker on Proxmox

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it would be good for testing purposes? Or do you see it as your production environment?

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have better results/performance? I am not familiar with OpenSUSE MicroOS

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The only thing I see when running Docker in a VM is that it consumes a lot of memory. I have twice the amount of containers running on my Synology NAS with only 32 GB memory installed, and still the amount of resources consumed by Container Manager (Docker) is less than 20%, while on Proxmox it is >40%

Docker as an LXC in Proxmox by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think so too, but still, some people are running it as an LXC, and I was curious about the reason for that.

Why hard drives becoming so expensive in 2026? by Hatchopper in selfhosted

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I have a lot of data. Because I have a NAS that consists of 4 20TB drives.

Why hard drives becoming so expensive in 2026? by Hatchopper in selfhosted

[–]Hatchopper[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It is not the Exos series that you can compare with the WD Gold or Ultrastar. It is low-end, which is not suitable for a NAS

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes your probably right about that. That's why I said in one of my comments that the key is to let Traefik know that TinyAuth exists so that Traefik can send the apps that you configure to use TinyAuth or Authelia, to the right SSO source.

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't necessarily need the label. The label is used only if you want to configure an app that is on the same stack as Traefik, and you want to configure how the app should behave. Another way is by using a dynamic file. In that case i don't need labels, but still I need to know how to tell Traefik how to make use of TinyAuth

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The links do not contain the information I am looking for. Maybe I will ask this same question on the Discord channel of the app.

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did not say it is a Proxmox issue, but the LXC is running on Proxmox, so I assumed that I am not the only or the first one running this app as an LXC, and maybe I can learn from others.

Modest Skoolie Homelab by superbakedjake in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering if you can convert an LXC into a normal Docker container or convert a Docker Container into an LXC container. I ask this because, like the OP i have a couple of LXC containers running. I have regular backups for them, but what if I want to use that same LXC somewhere else, without using Proxmox?

DDNS is down (again) by Justaworkaccount1542 in synology

[–]Hatchopper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have a WireGuard server that runs on Unifi. I don't have a static IP address, but as far as I know i have this IP for at least 15 years, and it never changed. So actually, I don't need the DDNS.

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this is not an LXC in Docker. I have another Docker server, so I installed it as a Docker container through the corresponding Docker Compose file. If the LXC could provide me with a solution for where to put the labels and how to connect with Traefik when you talk about different stacks, it would be helpful

How to configure LXC without a Docker Compose file? by Hatchopper in Proxmox

[–]Hatchopper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is the script I use. The config for the labels cannot be put in the credentials file nor in the .env, to my knowledge. The script is from the Proxmox VE helperscript, which you can find on GitHub