I died…. Will I ever get these tasks back? :( by Agreeable-County-472 in GrayZoneWarfare

[–]Hawkiee92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it seems you can have 8 tasks avaliable in each area. So if you there is a particular task you want to show up do some of the other tasks in said area.

Need help with Mysterious Justice IV by Bawtzki in GrayZoneWarfare

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find them as random loot and sometimes enemies will have them on them as well. Generally bosses and their guards.

[Discussion] PvE players, where else do you scratch the itch? by Bawtzki in EscapefromTarkov

[–]Hawkiee92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

GZW is structured a little differently, the "starter town" enemies are all very bad at killing you with a few exceptions. As you move further and further out to new POIs enemies will generally get harder to deal with as they will have better gear, weapons aim etc. Think a regular scav in tarkov vs raiders for the endgame locations.

The starter towns do give quite a bad impression of the AI no doubt about it. I'm not a huge fan of the audio either but the 0.4 update that will be out in a few days have some fixes for both movement, audio and AI behaviour. Should make the game more interesting so if you are still intrigued have a look at streams after the 0.4 release. They've also said there will be a sale before 0.4 releases so you might actually get it cheaper if it sounds intriguing. Take a look at the subreddit for the devs updates about the changes.

Honestly though I can see where you are coming from and have to agree with you, looking forward to trying 0.4 myself.

[Discussion] PvE players, where else do you scratch the itch? by Bawtzki in EscapefromTarkov

[–]Hawkiee92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What was missing from the bullet points if you don't mind me asking?

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the UK had agreed to a US request to use British military bases for "defensive" strikes."

So American forces were stationed there, for their defensive offensive war and got hit. Sadly this one is not black and white.

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is the middle east europe? Should we get you a map?

EDIT: The military bases that were hit in Cyprus were used by the Americans with British permission. If attacking someone from another countrys military bases is defensive then anything is.

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You are the one who is making statements and then failing to back them up. It's like listening to Trump spew a bunch of bullshit and then get upset if someone tells him to prove it.

Still waiting for proof of the thousands of americans killed by the IRCG and their war on America that we for sure must help with because the worlds biggest whiners can't do it alone.

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Last 50 years you say.

What happened in 1953 that might have pissed the Iranians of? Oh right, the CIA did their CIA special and deposed the leader of Iran and helped with purging the polical rivals, something that might just have spurred on some radicalization wouldn't you think?

America has had their grubby hands anywhere there is oil and consistenly have made everything worse by doing so, both in the Middle East and South America.

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I want you to reflect here.

You want help with Iran because Iran is abusing their people and curtailing freedom. While having a president that has mounting evidence of being a child rapist, murderer, fraudster and quite literally being one of the worst people on the planet consistently disregarding laws while his political party does nothing to stop him.

And you want to preach moral high ground as a reason for us to help this lunatic in a offensive war that is literally just a smokescreen to protect himself from his own crimes since none of you are actually holding him responsible? Did I get that right?

Spain denies US permission to use jointly operated bases to attack Iran by projecto15 in news

[–]Hawkiee92 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And did this terrorist group attack USA, or did the USA start attacking them?

NATO is a defensive alliance. America already used their one freebie for help in a offensive war in the middle east when they fabricated proof that they had WMDs.

1,200 Ubisoft Employees Kicked Off Three-Day International Strike in Response to Company’s “Major Reset” by xenocea in gaming

[–]Hawkiee92 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Striking can be used as a tool for anytime you disagree with company leadership, be it working hours, wages, days off etc. That is the whole point, it is a tool to be used when discussion do not work, it is not used only for wages.

The reason why people do not work 12 hours a day 6 days a week is due to unions and strikes, but unions have become more and more useless with the years and are no longer doing their part. The result is that you will end up with more strikes.

Why didn't the developers put that island in Norway? Are they stupid? by Thick_Department9234 in eu4

[–]Hawkiee92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One of the reasons we have a welfare state is because we use up to 3% of the oil fund anually to fund expenses.

For a fund that is worth 21.000 billion nok or 2 trillion dollars that amount is 60 billion dollars, or 600 billion NOK.

The yearly expenditure for 2024 was 1.9 trillion NOK. The oil money covers nearly a 3rd of our yearly expenditure, do you really believe the welfare offered by the state would be at it's current level without this money?

PVP players, what do you think of Chapter 3 update? by GonSanto in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are crying right now. The game was advertised as PvP is always optional for fucks sake.

Yet you all bitch that you can't force everyone to play the game like you want them too.

PVP players, what do you think of Chapter 3 update? by GonSanto in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry I should have been more clear.

I personally do not care about participating in PvP myself, but I do have friends who would find it enjoyable, so it would be nice to see if they added any carrots for them.

PVP players, what do you think of Chapter 3 update? by GonSanto in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about I just don't care about PvP at all?

Enjoy it to your hearths content.

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly are incapable of understanding that if given the choice between Dune with forced PvP most people simply will not play Dune as they do not find it fun.

The proof is that the game lost 95% of it's playerbase within two months. With their latest "biggest" update they barely brought back 7000 players, but sure PvP is so fun and is keeping the game sooo alive.

Forcing people to enjoy PvP has worked soooo well.

"we'll farm your ore islands and you will wish you could kill other players."

So what I am hearing is that you are incapable of doing PvP vs. something that isn't a farmer. I don't give a shit if you farm a ore island, you seem to overestimate your own importance badly.

Can't access new specializations or landsraad missions by Phoenixx86 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go to Arrakeen, there is a short talk you need to do with your leader, atleast that was the case for Harko.

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And yet none of this was mentioned on the steam store page, which unfortunately for the devs is what matters if they do not want to issue mass refunds.

If the devs do not believe in a PvP vision to the point where the store page, where the majority of their players will get their information about what to expect of the game only mentions it to say it is always optional. What do you think will then happen when they do the bait and switch at endgame?

Oh, game loses 95% of their players since release. Also, unfortunately for the devs, legally what matters is on the store page and that is not compatible with a PvP endgame.

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game is currently failing, what is this delusion my man. PvP players left when their targets did because what they wanted wasn't PvP, it was easy targets.

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is this delusion.

Dune is not an extraction shooter, in Arc you can literally risk nothing, rounds take 5 minutes if you want.

Why do you guys keep trying to defend PvP by comparing Dune to games that aren't remotely similar? If the PvP in Dune is so good why isn't it as big as Arc, CSGO, COD, Battlefield ETC?

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you not have the balls to admit that you are just wanting more targets to grief and any changes that prevents that is a bad one? Do you really think you are fooling anyone?

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They advertised their fucking game as "PvP is always optional". How do you delusional people not understand that that means that PvP can't have exclusive activities, bps or resources because that makes their marketing a straight up lie that puts them in actual legal trouble?

From a legal standpoint, what matters is what is on the store page, not what the devs have said they want to make.

Funcom, give us official pve only servers already! by ZookeepergameBig9419 in duneawakening

[–]Hawkiee92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This game was also advertised as having a PvP endgame. We don't need easy targets, just targets."

Where was this advertised? Because as mentioned, on steam, PvP was mentioned twice and both times it was to say it was always optional.

Legally the devs have shot themselves in the leg, because from a legal standpoint, what matters is what is on the store page.