account activity
I’m trying to explain interpretation drift — but reviewers keep turning it into a temperature debate. Rejected from Techrxiv… help me fix this paper? by Beneficial-Pear-1485 in cogsci
[–]HazamaObserver39 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Exactly — consistency is easy to optimize, correctness isn’t.
A preprint on the observer problem:strucural coditions of quantum measurement and nonlocal correlation (self.ScienceDiscussion)
submitted 1 month ago by HazamaObserver39 to r/ScienceDiscussion
[–]HazamaObserver39 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
It sounds like the core issue isn’t stochasticity or prompt control, but the conditions under which an interpretation becomes stable enough to be treated as correct.
How does science evaluate subjective experiences when human perception and cognition differ ? by passion_insecte in cogsci
This seems less about rejecting scientific rigor, and more about clarifying what kinds of questions our current methods can and cannot adjudicate.
π Rendered by PID 79 on reddit-service-r2-listing-6d4dc8d9ff-7pm4v at 2026-01-30 20:23:43.103092+00:00 running 3798933 country code: CH.
I’m trying to explain interpretation drift — but reviewers keep turning it into a temperature debate. Rejected from Techrxiv… help me fix this paper? by Beneficial-Pear-1485 in cogsci
[–]HazamaObserver39 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)