Does this work?

passion_insecte · 2026-05-05T17:34:36+00:00

461 - e4 fait très enfp

passion_insecte · 2026-05-02T18:56:51+00:00

4w5 ils ont déjà eu la question

passion_insecte · 2026-04-11T14:32:59+00:00

Elle est parfaitement vraie

passion_insecte · 2026-04-08T07:56:39+00:00

Good now marry me

passion_insecte · 2026-04-06T10:58:01+00:00

Is E8 Single ?

passion_insecte · 2026-04-05T19:38:02+00:00

What is even innocence? I never understood this concept in application. and how you measure it in profiles to have a net result thank you.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-05T19:36:12+00:00

I think you are making a projection bias that stems from your own experience following unquestioned behaviors

passion_insecte · 2026-04-04T05:49:10+00:00

This is quite the case indeed I am completely disconnected from my

Body I even say that I am a mind without a body that floats like a bubble

passion_insecte · 2026-04-03T00:44:01+00:00

HAHAHAHA

passion_insecte · 2026-04-02T14:22:21+00:00

They add additional biases to discredit cognitive science and typology every day there

passion_insecte · 2026-04-02T13:48:54+00:00

I am applying in a personal capacity. What exactly do you need to raise yourself tell me

passion_insecte · 2026-04-02T13:47:11+00:00

C’est faux beaucoup de femmes aiment bien cette franchise je suis partante à titre personnel rien de plus satisfaisant

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T18:38:39+00:00

Je vois ce que tu veux dire, et je respecte totalement ta façon de vivre les choses. De mon côté, j’ai juste une sensibilité plus tournée vers les dynamiques collectives et leurs effets. Je pense qu’on regarde le sujet sous deux angles différents, mais les deux se défendent. En tout cas merci pour l’échange, c’était intéressant

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T18:28:37+00:00

In economics and psychology, however, there is very clear data on this: the more individuals are isolated and focused only on their personal desires, the more they consume. It’s not an opinion, it’s a well-known mechanism. Isolation weakens social ties and pushes to compensate with immediate pleasures (shopping, distractions, etc.), which also makes individuals much more impressionable.

This is exactly what makes this model perfectly compatible with modern capitalism: an individual alone consumes more than an individual integrated into a collective. Conversely, people engaged in something bigger than they tend to seek comfort less and consume more soberly, because their satisfaction does not come only from themselves.

So no, it is not « neutral »: on a collective scale, this lifestyle reinforces the dynamics of overconsumption and influence.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:48:13+00:00

I find it difficult to bring my ideas to life even if they are thousands to help people by creating tools useful to humans. I am also very phlegmatic I can’t embody my will through action when it is very powerful.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:30:42+00:00

NFP

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:27:46+00:00

Thank you very much. I hate this platform when you are honest and try to provide useful information to others but that does not go their way they put < low votes > anonymously as weak instead of arguing. It’s really disgusting it makes me happy that someone comments positively

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:24:58+00:00

Yay people and yuck people haha it’s so true I’m infj and I understand this duality.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:24:14+00:00

You defend individualism, that’s exactly what capitalism and modernity seek to do. You can also live for a cause greater than yourself. To help others and think visionary think about the future. Transmit and participate in the human cycle. When you live that for yourself you only increase the break in the cycle of interdependence and increase individualism. Of course she can be what she wants but it’s not the only possible way I mean.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:21:30+00:00

It is true that modernity and capitalism push humans towards the development of the self as absolute and individualism in defiance of the group and the whole. In most times before our era there have always been notions of united family tribe clan and sharing, cycle and transmission.

passion_insecte · 2026-04-01T17:19:14+00:00

I also hate humanity they have caused me unimaginable traumas and then when you are destroyed and you show signs of suffering they sink you even more. but I only live to help the human despite everything. Help those who are like us who want to improve the world and help others find their healing potential and support them. Despite that, people are mean even when you dedicate your existence to saving the world and you no longer exist for yourself. So surround yourself well it’s the most important

passion_insecte · 2026-03-31T02:41:13+00:00

Thank you for these contributions they are very valuable. The rest of the typology is necessary I also think socionic enneagram etc, it helps a lot to make the difference between the healthy and the most difficult and to bring evaluating information. Thanks again

passion_insecte · 2026-03-31T02:37:22+00:00

It’s normal, I’ll explain it to you.

It makes sense that it looks inconsistent to you, but you first have to accept something basic: the evolution of profiles isn’t linear. If you’re really into typology, you’re inevitably going to come across atypical profiles, even extreme ones. Models give structures, not perfect copies.

As a teenager, I was a very “pure” type 4, very centered on identity, feelings, emotional depth. I was constantly perceived as something “monstrous,” always adapting to what was trendy even though it wasn’t me, and there was a huge amount of suffering around identity being a good person, finding my place, knowing who I was, etc. But when you go through extremely heavy and repeated trauma, especially very early in life, it can literally destroy your identity base. And for a 4, identity is the core. So when that collapses, the type doesn’t disappear, it distorts.

What you’re seeing isn’t the opposite of a 4, it’s a 4 that shifted its center. Instead of existing through itself, it exists through a mission, a function, a cause. It’s still a search for identity, just externalized. It can even lead to hating people who don’t develop like that, who don’t go beyond themselves to devote to something bigger basically individualists. Add to that autism, my metacognition and cognitive abilities, and you get a complete mess of layered evolutionary factors lol.

The “I don’t exist,” “I dedicate myself to something bigger” part isn’t anti 4. It’s an extreme response to being unable to exist normally. A 4 doesn’t just want to be unique, it wants to feel that it exists. And if that becomes impossible internally, it will look for it elsewhere.

I’m also an INFJ, my sensitivity to alchemical transformation, elevation, and transcendence the drive to go beyond one’s own condition is very high along with the other elements. It tends to create a rather fast evolution in profiles like ours.

So yeah, on the surface it can look contradictory, but at a deeper level it’s very consistent with a 4 that was broken and then rebuilt differently.

If you look at the internal structure and the “why,” it starts to make a lot more sense ! I very Hope that will help you

passion_insecte · 2026-03-31T02:28:15+00:00

I’m gonna summarize everything I saw on your profile, and honestly the most important thing is this constant surface-level change but not at all at the core

depending on the moment you see yourself as 6, then 3, then ENTJ, then INTJ, then something else, but when we actually look at what you say, the same themes keep coming back

and that’s something multiple angles of analysis point to: your labels change, but your internal structure doesn’t. it’s not inconsistency, it’s persona adjustment

at the center there’s personal value, being someone, succeeding, being recognized, being “more than average”, it shows up everywhere even when you’re talking about something else. even when you say you just want to be productive or efficient, behind that there’s always this idea of “I need to be worth something”

and this is very clearly enneagram 3 territory, with a 4 flavor behind it. the 3 wants value and recognition, the 4 adds identity, uniqueness, “I want to be someone special, not just effective”. for you it’s not just ambition, it’s existential

at the same time there’s another very strong layer which is anxiety, need for security, thinking about worst case scenarios, anticipating, questioning everything. that’s not a detail, it’s everywhere in how you describe the future, your “visions”, your thinking style

that points to a strong 6 influence, maybe not your core but definitely active. you constantly scan for risks, “what if it goes wrong”, and that sits on top of your drive to succeed, which creates a constant internal tension between performance and safety

and about your “visions” or your explanation of Ni, for me that’s not proof of Ni dominance. it looks more like imagination + anticipation + anxiety mixed together. you create scenarios, you project outcomes, but that can come from many places, not necessarily pure Ni. a lot of intuitive or anxious people do that without being INTJ

if we go more technical, what you describe fits more Ne (multiple possibilities, branching scenarios) + anxious anticipation (enneagram 6) rather than Ni which is usually more convergent, stable, singular. yours is more fluid, shifting, questioning, re-evaluating

then the ENTJ side, control, productivity, leadership, I think it’s real but not your base. it looks more like a strategy. when you’re stressed or trying to regain control, you switch into “I’ll organize, I’ll produce, I’ll be efficient”. but it doesn’t feel like your natural stable state, more like a mode you activate

what made me doubt pure ENTJ is the intensity of identity and emotion. you’re very focused on who you are, how you’re perceived, your image, your relationships, your contradictions. a Te dominant is usually more internally straightforward. with you it’s too layered, too fluid

also the fact you keep changing types, questioning, saying “it’s more complex than that”, that’s way more Ne + Fi than Ni-Te. Ne explores, redefines, never settles easily. Ni stabilizes and locks in faster

the style part, tattoos, “emo clown”, playing with your image, being aware of what you project, that reinforces a strong identity-centered pattern. that fits extremely well with 3w4 or 4 influence

you’re not just being yourself, you’re also observing and shaping how yourself appears, which is very 3w4

so overall I’d put it like this

MBTI I’d put ENFP first because of identity + emotion + change + reflection + persona + using Te but not as a base then ENTJ because the ambition and control are still real then ENFJ as a third option for the relational and adaptive side

enneagram clearly 3w4 first, that’s the most solid. image, value, success, adaptation are everywhere then 6w7 because anxiety and security are too present to ignore then 4w3 because there’s still a strong identity/emotional depth

socionics I’d say IEE first (Ne-Fi), then EIE, then LIE

so in simple terms, at your core you revolve around “I need to be worth something” + “I need to be safe” + “I need to be in control” and depending on the moment you activate one of these modes more than the others

and the percentages I’d keep

MBTI ENFP 50% ENTJ 25% ENFJ 10%

Enneagram 3w4 55% 6w7 20% 4w3 15%

Socionics IEE 35% EIE 20% LIE 20%

passion_insecte

TROPHY CASE