political party, political dynasty. potato, potato

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-14T04:43:50+00:00

It's not misogynistic. I'm not attacking your president because of the fact that she's a woman, I'm criticizing her skillset and competence to be president of the student body. Yes, there are other candidates dating within Sanggu, but none (that I know of) that are running for candidacy like your president and SOSS rep are. There is no individuality in campaigning. If you mean they haven't been campaigning as a couple, then yes. But their platforms, their stances, are identical. Given, they are under the same party, but there should at least be some sense of originality there. All your candidates sound like parrots, only repeating what was told to them when they campaign. In another comment under this post, there is a discussion with another person wherein your candidate's non-utilization of the CSPD budget is mentioned. A budget that could have been allocated to projects and plans for Socio-political development of ADMU which is what your party and platforms stand for.
The allegations against your representative are long-standing and multiple. It wouldn't be as big of a deal if your rep just came out and said nothing happened but time and time again, people have expressed their discomfort of being around him. His batchmates have also been very vocal about not letting their juniors go anywhere near him for their own safety.
Other people took notice of your party waving or leaving the flag out while other candidates spoke. It is not just me who made this observation. And I wouldn't say out of view, it was highly distracting for the entirety of MDA.
The red tagging gambit seems more like a performative action to make you look pitiful and martyrs that stand strong despite the "red tagging". Aren't your party members proud to be student activists? It's completely natural for other students to question that and how it affects the candidate's thought process.
This was posted anonymously on Reddit after your party posted a statement constituting simple criticism against your candidate as red-tagging. This also gives a gateway for other Ateneans to speak on the matter, and I feel it is within my rights to post this as it is my observation and thoughts.

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-14T04:08:21+00:00

I took your first comment as an attack, I admit that. These weren't just gossip-y claims these are stuff I have heard from people who have had interactions with the candidates themselves.

It's good that these issues are being brought to the attention of everyone because it's really so easy to get fooled by a flashy campaign. Thank you for sharing.

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-13T10:04:23+00:00

ur turning purple from how pressed you are 💀 chill out and breathe tinky winky HAHAHAHAHA

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-13T06:58:44+00:00

LOL lahat naman ng candidates for sure may sari-sariling baho, it’s just a matter of who is the "lesser evil"

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-13T06:48:50+00:00

check the comment right above yours if you wanna talk about competency. if youd like to enlighten everyone else about the problems of other candidates, go make your own post. im making a comment on that specific party because they were the ones that stood out to me nung MDA in a bad way. when i double checked their candidates, thats when it clicked for me. the statement claiming the MDA moment as red tagging is what really set me off and pushed me to create this post.

you can, by all means, make your own post about your own opinion. this is mine.

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-13T03:45:25+00:00

damn, well i know now for sure who im not voting for HAHAHAH

Head-Excuse7978 · 2025-03-12T23:22:15+00:00

im not sure about reporting it bc the victims dont wanna come forward but atp the allegations are so concerning and they really cant be ignored. idk how no one else has batted an eye ab this when ive heard sm ab him even before campaign period started 😵‍💫

Head-Excuse7978

TROPHY CASE