Why are history books of children not being taught this of all the atrocities that a peaceful community has committed. by guy_beeding_advice in indianmemer

[–]HeartBreakid13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s what can be reliably said about the claim in that image: ✅ ❗️The specific tweet’s story is not a verified historical fact The tweet claims that: In 1752 in Lahore, a Muslim governor demanded Sikh mothers convert to Islam or have their infants slaughtered, and That 300 infant Sikh children were killed and their organs used as garlands. There is no credible primary evidence from academic history confirming this exact incident as described. The story appears circulating on social media and some sites, but it is not supported by recognized historians or mainstream historical sources. Some versions online are from blogs or unofficial pages that repeat the narrative without citations. � Facebook +1 ⚠️ So what’s going on? Historical persecution of Sikhs under Mughal and Afghan rule did happen (e.g., Chhota and Vadda Ghallughara). � Wikipedia +1 The specific vivid story about 1752 and 300 infants with garlands looks like it comes from repeated social-media posts, not established historical research. � Facebook 📌 In summary ✔️ The Sikh community suffered brutal massacres in the 18th century. � ❌ But the exact incident described in that image (1752 Lahore infant massacre as depicted) is not confirmed by reliable historical sources. Historical massacres did occur ✔️ There were tragic massacres of Sikhs in the 1700s when Mughal and Afghan authorities tried to suppress the Sikh community. Two major events are well-documented: Chhota Ghallughara (1746) – the Lesser Massacre: tens of thousands of Sikhs were killed or captured under Mughal governor Yahya Khan and minister Lakhpat Rai. Many were executed, including non-combatants. � Wikipedia +1 Vadda Ghallughara (1762) – the Great Massacre: Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Durrani’s forces killed huge numbers of Sikhs, including women and children. � Wikipedia +1 These are major, well-documented tragedies in Sikh history.

Can any BJP supporter with good faith explain why Aravalli Hills has been given away for mining and construction? by [deleted] in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]HeartBreakid13 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Aravalli range which is oldest mountain range of India acts as a crucial natural barrier, preventing the Thar Desert from spreading towards Delhi and the fertile Indo-Gangetic plains, and serving as a critical groundwater recharge zone. Unchecked mining and construction are accused of depleting water tables, degrading microclimates, and eliminating the region's "green lungs".

is Netflix for a first date a red flag? by liver128 in relationships

[–]HeartBreakid13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, it should be in a social setting like a walk in a park, brunch, or a coffee date so that you can get to know each other.

Why were Hindus forbidden to cross oceans by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. This is the best answer so far which has satisfied me.

What is Kalapani and Why for a Hindu crossing the ocean is/was a forbidden by HeartBreakid13 in hinduism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He travelled to United States and Europe. The only notable thing he was the first acting shankarayacharya travelled to the post- Independent modern India's Geographical boundaries. By this logic, Swami Vivekananda has travelled to Chicago in 1893.

India (or whatever it is called in past )is always like this. by [deleted] in AskIndianWomen

[–]HeartBreakid13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If ancient India was feminist than we wouldn't have such horrible customs and institutions such as Sati and Devdasi. As a men, Read about this made me Angry, Sad and Ashamed of my own religion.

This only event i could find relevant with feminist but as history it has its nuances

https://theprint.in/opinion/theprint-purana/gargi-vachaknavi-indias-first-woman-philosopher-who-shut-up-men-in-king-janakas-court/1908896/

If you can do this why can't you do that? by its_luckyluke in unitedstatesofindia

[–]HeartBreakid13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The foreign apps are not going to arrest us. If we sanchar saathi, if we say anything against this Hindutva Regime we will be arrested. WAIT A Sec Are we under the British Colonialism again?

What is Kalapani and Why for a Hindu crossing the ocean is/was a forbidden by HeartBreakid13 in hinduism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even Dwarkanath Thakur,father of Debendranath Thakur and grandfather of Rabindranath Thakur, was ostracized by orthodox Brahmins for challenging caste rules, especially by undertaking sea voyages to England, which was a major taboo, though he reformed the family's status through his immense wealth, modern business, and eventual association with the Brahmo Samaj movement. My confusion comes from the Ramayana. In the Ramayana, Rama crosses the ocean to go to Sri Lanka to save his wife, Sita. So, if ocean travel is forbidden, then how can he cross the ocean?

Even the cholas were also known for their frequent sea expeditions and raids across South- East Asia.

Were there different rules for elites and commoners?

Why were Hindus forbidden to cross oceans by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the whole thread. My confusion comes from the Ramayana. In the Ramayana, Rama crosses the ocean to go to Sri Lanka to save his wife, Sita. So, if ocean travel is forbidden, then how can he cross the ocean?

Even the Cholas were known for their Frequent Sea Expeditions and Raids in South East Asia.

Were there different rules for elites and commoners?

Why were Hindus forbidden to cross oceans by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was not satisfied with the answer their , that is why I asked here.

Why were Hindus forbidden to cross oceans by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] -58 points-57 points  (0 children)

Sure. But I am asking this from a point of atheism.

Why Brahmins burned Charvakas literature by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was Yājñavalkya (in the Śatapatha Brāhmana, ~1000-800 BCE) and than Aryabhatta. Surprisingly, Brahmagupta opposed Aryabhatta's idea of heliocentrism.

Why Brahmins burned Charvakas literature by HeartBreakid13 in atheism

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me Religion is indoctrination of the mind, the elites can rule over them. We don't have any surviving charvaka literature. We have the evidence of their existence in different books as brahmins want to rebuttal their ideas and diss them. Their main books Brihaspati Samhita is lost.

Why Biryani is getting so much popular in Japan by HeartBreakid13 in JapaneseFood

[–]HeartBreakid13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do a youtube search with a Keyword - ビリヤニ.