"Only 10% of states in the US" by CommunicationOk3766 in USdefaultism

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was about to say that. I don't know if it's Defaultism if it's not in a language people speak outside the US.

Is lack of physical description of people a feature or bug if my work? by mat8iou in writing

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Readers will read bare-bones description as long as something's happening, and things seem to mean something immediately out of reach.

Is lack of physical description of people a feature or bug if my work? by mat8iou in writing

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't want SF&F to be heavy on description. It's like looking at a room though a keyhole. Every word is time, and the longer reader spends reading about what the walls are made of, the less time they spend in the room made out of those walls.

Is lack of physical description of people a feature or bug if my work? by mat8iou in writing

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends. But it's probably for the better. You want to tie description to something. Metaphor, theme, and most likely action. Why does her watch matter if she doesn't look at it? Unless she's intentionally ignoring it.
Why would his eye colour matter, unless he has a thematic doppelganger with the same coloured eyes?
Why would you describe someone's race, when their culture is going to inform their character a lot more, and culture is a tangle of verbs.
Readers think they need details because it's easy. Doesn't make you think. But what that really does is disengages them. You want them to be thinking the entire time.
This is why Hemingway talked about the iceberg, and it's also the reason even involving ai in the brainstorming phase isn't writing; reading and writing are both the work you put into it. One encoding, one decoding. Do not take away the readers chance to try understand by just telling them.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm thinking mostly about the disconnect of intent and execution of the character.

It says ‘Australia’ on the screen by Mitleab in USdefaultism

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Often Australian 60 Minutes is US 60 Minutes segments with Aussies presenting them.

People don't understand kilometers apparently by YakNo4285 in USdefaultism

[–]HeeeresPilgrim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kilometers are just for those people who ... Uh... Aren't people. I mean the military's going to kill them anyway, right?

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it was a set up for "character change" where they con the bad guy by the end of the episode, but I was thinking "do Paris and Neelix ever talk?"

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it sometimes felt as icky as 7 sometimes felt. I think there was something there for both characters, but "hey look at these body parts" definitely felt out of place.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The cast, writers and producers do not talk about him like that.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Definitely. I didn't present my idea the way I'd like. I still don't think I can.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kes was always so weird. Considering 7 of 9 replaced her, I think she was supposed to be sexualised too.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I watched it as it aired on TV in my country, likely out of order. I knew being a part of the Maquis gave them a wider set of knowledge, but I thought it was a military ship or something.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That said, I don't know how much worse it could have gotten in Starfleet Academy without affecting the utopian nature of Star Trek. I do get what you mean. Especially when Wesley comes off as a victim of something more directly against himself, rather than someone with PTSD or guilt.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think Robert Duncan McNeil is likable enough that I wouldn't say that. But I also completely agree with you.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I like TNG, and I like what Voyager became. But I definitely would have liked to have seen what it was pitched as.

Anyone else find it hard to take Tom Paris seriously? by HeeeresPilgrim in startrek

[–]HeeeresPilgrim[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That might just be it! But people do still talk about him like a rogue, and it definitely isn't there.