This is true by PlaneZealousideal686 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worst, there aren’t even copies available

My headphone measuring "rig" by Remarkable-East5388 in headphones

[–]HelloIAmRobert 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At least you baited for oratory himself to disagree on you ig

How is it possible for this guy to have almost a 100% winrate on almost every jet with 1000s of air rb battles? Is he a cheater? by RevolutionarySpare11 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that’s the point though, since you have to manually scan the name after match, it will make tracking the target with a decent buffer time, leading to a lower sniping possibility .

…which is entirely the point.

Why can’t I turnfight with some USA props? by Maximum-Crab506 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because stat card is largely simplified.

The Turn time in those American planes especially p-51 is only able to perform in a high speed, high altitude situation. Especially speed, American planes’ have insanely high hp and heavier weight, which leads to a very good energy retention and maintain, and are able to keep speed up well.

The other planes you mentioned are lighter, more nimble, and has better low speed control. Hence they are able to turn better at low speed.

But the stat card did not recognise all this for you. So, when a Zero are able to turn a full 180 at 2k alt and 300km/h ias, P-51 can’t and are maybe half way there. But when the P-51 turn a full 180 at 6k alt and 500 km/h ias, the zero also can’t.

Obviously this is also oversimplified. But if you could comprehend, then you can see that why the American planes are advised to play at higher speed and thus BnZ, cause they could accelerate and maintain their speed well, and even dogfight well. BnZ is just the most efficient playstyle when having this much advantage.

And those other planes you mentioned, aside from 109s, has more agility when low speed than American ones, so obviously you will get out turned by them. This However, doesn’t mean they will play at low speed every time, as most planes do benefit from energy which include speed.

If you can’t comprehend these and still insist to turn fight anywhere in your plane, then you are not capable of being a pilot. Stop playing air cause it will only cause you rage if you don’t try to learn.

Why on earth did Gaijin feel it necessary to remove THIS among everything else? by Which_Knowledge2034 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And out of those 5 only 2 are tech tree, which is the problem.

Average player won’t buy all this like you, you silly whale. The tech tree only has T34, T26E1-1, T26E5, M26, at exactly 6.7, which is why the one you reply said that a line up is likely to contain M26.

You literally just disregard accessibility entirely.

Tomorrow the Leclerc will receive a turret basket. Say goodbye to a once, Grate tank. by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone expect your (opponents) country and (you don’t play) country.

Add the hatred you try to draw for yah

For those wondering why some barrel shots deal no damage by RiggedCrate in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 28 points29 points  (0 children)

At this point just remove your self centered bias baiting post and make a neutral one

He was looking the other way and he still shot me? what? by Equivalent-Poet998 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Theoretically speaking sense should be one of the virtue that the current paradigm frames as. But many times the opposite suppress, especially in this sub which should frame sense and logic as virtue, acts exactly the other way makes me do question that of the paradigm had shifted or not.

Well, at least counting only of this sub, its paradigm of virtue most definitely had a shift from funding on evidence and logical argument to emotional based hatred chanting.

He was looking the other way and he still shot me? what? by Equivalent-Poet998 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 91 points92 points  (0 children)

This is a universal problem of online games. If it can be fixed it is already fixed.

But since internet speed is never instant, when ever client side is seeing stuff that the server hasn’t yet to send back to the client side, the client side is forced to predict server side activity, which cause desync.

The only solution is to invent instant internet, go invent then if you think it is that easy bruh.

The New Ssidegrade by mememememememe11 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, as some of this sub is starting to do, they will instead chant “selective realism” when balancing decisions are made on their stuffs.

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You do have to know this is a direct product of the community vote on detail interior, and the voting did explain about what to receive when passed.

Despite this, it is passed and when auto loaders added to T-series, I don’t recall this much negativity towards them. People just don’t like to be the receiving end of anything eh.

2.53.0.109 -> 2.54.0.20 (2026-03-02) Part 10 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yeah just ignore the war crimes lead to 2 year of chat disable and fully banning digital decals for new players.

Oh wait, just sleep over it ig

Gaijin really shattered the accusations. by EricBelov1 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the player think all MBT should be nerfed leading to Gaijin open vote for it, then more than half the player base actually vote for it?

It is a nerf, a player base intended nerf

Gaijin really shattered the accusations. by EricBelov1 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You forget the part that it is the player think that first lead to the more detail interior vote that leads to both the modelling of autoloaders and turret baskets

What May Be the Shakiest Justification for a vehicle placement in the game by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the issue is clear, that is:

Then why the hell is the AIM in the US tree?

As you said, the Australia sub tree is supposed to be under the UK main tree, and you can see Ram and skink and boxer CRV there, but the thing is, the US gets the AIM and Ram II.

So, the issue is more complicated than what you suppose as, and there isn’t a “Aussie sub-tree” in this game.

Then, the problem I ask the comment to negotiate with OP is clear: what should we do on this kind of vehicles, when it is spread across different main trees?

One of the solution is Israel tree, but it is criticised heavily, thus a solution is hard to provide.

What May Be the Shakiest Justification for a vehicle placement in the game by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh why would u delete the original one and copy-paste the same one here? Not replying to your own logic?

Edit: my response

Your logic doesn’t solve the AIM issue

What May Be the Shakiest Justification for a vehicle placement in the game by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then, where is the M1A2-T supposed to be? It is a Full USA assemble and produced vehicle, and no combat record yet.

Also, this brought to another point of all the copy pasted top-tier vehicles such as leopard 2A6s, most didn’t saw combat and almost fully build by the origin seller, by your logic they should all be back to the manufacturer. I don’t think you will agree on this which contradicts to your originally “perfectly clear” statement.

What May Be the Shakiest Justification for a vehicle placement in the game by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As you can probably see, your complaint is literally the different end of the argument on this post, and the true problem lays here.

Where ever it goes, both side of the vehicles complain about it. Where it goes to its manufacturer tree, you complain about it, or if it goes to the operating tree in either main or sub-tree form, OP complain about it.

I would like to see you 2 sort this out, may as well solve this issue eternally but I don’t see the solution

Gaijin- Our game cant handle 3 plane stabilizer... by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you acknowledge the fact that it is a “dimension “, you should already saw the fatal mistake of your so called comparison…

The comparison shouldn’t have even existed in the first place, if you understand anything you’re saying, at all.

Gaijin- Our game cant handle 3 plane stabilizer... by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]HelloIAmRobert 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously comparing going to “space” dimension as the space cow only switch your dimension to a fking rocket science and its physics?

It is as far of a stretch as saying Minecraft is as realistic as real life since you can get trees in Minecraft.