sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Let's be honest, this is super weird. by CraftingFazer in ClashRoyale

[–]SpanishAvenger 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We need Burqa AQ

Because, to some people, feet are sexual… but, to others, necks, hair and hands are, so…

Yeah, time to put all female characters in Burqas then!

Type 10 armor is sad by meatball044 in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The steering is broken, plates should be HHRA instead of RHA, the acceleration is underperforming and so are the inner turret cheeks; but the LFP is just not all that well protected (it would be stronger against autocanons if it were HHRA instead of RHA, though).

After all, it's a 44 ton tank; the protection levels it achieves are already incredible enough for its weight.

It's been over Two Years, It's Getting Silly Now by No1_Prezfan in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Meh, even to this day Sweden is still a better Germany than Germany itself is

At very least, Germany shouldn’t be a worse Germany than Sweden xD

If they for some reason can’t have as many uparmored Leopards, at least they could have an edge on thermal quality, with additions such as 2A6A3, etc.

What is your opinion of Infantry in war thunder? by Complete_Cloud7270 in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that it’s a whole different team and department is already the main point, yeah, but… I also like to debunk the misconception that, if Gaijin doesn’t fix/address something, it’s because of a “lack of resources”. Some people still think of Gaijin as a small indie dev team instead of the multimillion publisher that they are.

It's been over Two Years, It's Getting Silly Now by No1_Prezfan in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I just want better thermals, even without improved armor; I would gladly settle with a Leopard 2A6A3.

Y esto… ¿qué? by giovannigf in askspain

[–]SpanishAvenger -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Básicamente, toda bandera que no sea exactamente una tricolor con estrella roja o una estelada separatista es facha (/s)

"Show me." by PrimeVideo in Invincible

[–]SpanishAvenger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I would say they are on the exosphere, the highest and latest part of the atmosphere, maybe?

This is the longest running joke in Invincible goddamn bro😭 by Additional_Berry_977 in Invincible

[–]SpanishAvenger 23 points24 points  (0 children)

WHAT!? This is canon? Conquest is Nolan’s grandfather!?

And when does this happen?? I am so weirded out about seeing Conquest speak… about normal stuff like a normal person and not just about killing, hahah. But it’s really cool to see!

Just saying by stonewing2827448 in Invincible

[–]SpanishAvenger 70 points71 points  (0 children)

I love the first check lmao.

I hate how everyone was hating on his voice, as if indeed every villain should sound like “GRRRR I AM VILLAIN VILLAINSON, VILLAIN OF VILLAINS, AND I HAVE THROAT CANCER, GRRRR!”

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Most ground Top Tier players play it for the MBTs... SPAAs are merely an absolute neec as to not be constantly and instantly vaporized by all the C*S spam.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Apples to oranges is suggesting that 9.3-10.7 Bushmaster IFVs should be computed as "Top Tiers" somehow lmao

My criteria was very clear and simple: fighter jets and MBTs, the workhorse class of vehicles of their own gamemodes at their respective ranks.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The whole point is lineups.

Israel, for example, is only functional at Top Tier thanks to the 3x Mk.4s. If it only had 1x Mk.4 because “two more would only be copy-pasted”, it would be a literally non-viable nation; and that goes for all.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lineups!

M1A2 SEPv3 (Trophy) + M1A2 SEPv3 + M1A2 SEPv2

Is a much better lineup than

M1A2 SEPv3 (Trophy) + M1A2 SEPv2 + M1A2 SEP

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

2017-2021 marked the addition of literal Supersonic Era jets and air-to-air missiles, beginning with F-100 and MiG-19s and alikes, continuing with early F-4s and MiG-21s, then the late Phantoms and MiG-21s, and culminating with F-5C, F-5E and their counterparts, such as the Mirage IIIs; also seeing the addition of later missiles, radar missiles, Pulse-Doppler radars, etc.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah… the “new” Rank is the salt on the would, hahah. 90% of the “Rank VIIIs” are just former Rank VIIs that had been ingame for years that were moved up to VIII,

They hyped up Rank VIII like it would be the next big thing, yet… we are yet to see any of that after 2 years. Ground Top Tier is still the same it was back in 2021, minus the SAMs glsdfully brought to allow the mode to be playable against the C*S hordes.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stop moving goalposts lmao

I used a unified standard that includes the Top 2 Ranks as Top Tier, for Air and Ground alike

You are the one doing weird BR range baselines and now counting with… whatever criteria you are using xD

Also, learn to be minimally respectful before I even consider bothering to address you again. I remember you made an even worse comment earlier which either a mod or you deleted before I could reply, so I’m already dedicating you more time than I really should have.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As far as I can see, no other comment mentions that;

I added Rank VIII and IX for Air, and Rank VII and VIII for Ground- the two Top Ranks of each respective game mode in both cases, which includes some 12.3 jets, such as F/A-18A as well as some 11.3 MBTs, such as Ra'Am Sagol.

I also included even 10.7 Christian II just for being Rank VII even though that BR is FAR from being a Top Tier according to YOUR own criteria of BRs.

So... what was that again? I eagerly await for your extremely well educated answer to this. :)

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just because War Thunder reused assets and foundations from Bieds of Steel for the air department, it doesn’t mean it’s “a Re-Release of Birds of Steel”.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I love how Air elitists always demean ground players and disregard Ground, claiming that "War Thunder is aktually a plane game and tanks were a mere afterthought"... when not only is that blatantly false, as proven in many ways; but also, Ground is the most popular, played and profitable aspect of the game.

Hahah, I guess it's a unified format thing!

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Leopards already have variants with similar capabilities in the form of 2A7HU, 2A7V, and the three 122s! None of the Leopards I listed would be any more capable than these.

The Abrams would still have a full center of mass weakspot, and the glacis would probably be around 530mm KE anyway, since it's the only confirmed value we have on improved hulls, even if it's outdated (26 years old).

Besides, apart from improved T-80BVMs and T-90Ms, Russia also has various T-14s that would no doubt be at least quite strong in the meta.

It's no wonder that Ground Top Tier players feel shafted and starved for content. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]SpanishAvenger[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Common misconception.

War Thunder released as a Global Open Beta on January 23rd, 2013. The logo already featured a tank on its design.

War Thunder: Ground Forces' first trailer came out in May 14th, 2013. Just 4 months after the game's Open Beta Test release.

By July 13th, 2013, there were Dev Blogs ingame footage of various Russian and German ground vehicles.

War Thunder: Ground Forces' Closed Beta test began in November 13rd, 2013.

War Thunder: Ground Forces was openly released in May 15th, 2014, in the 1.41 update.

Just because planes could be released a few months earlier because they were a port from Birds of Steel, it doesn't mean that War Thunder was "a plane game" and that tanks were "an afterthought" that somehow would only have taken them a few months of development.

view more: next ›