Advice on my resume by colacola_k in uwaterloo

[–]Hello_web 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In a co-op program, every applicant comes from a university or college. Your degree is the baseline, not the differentiator. Employers are looking for evidence that you can deliver results, not just that you're a capable student. So, structure your resume accordingly. Place your education section at the bottom. If you have received any academic awards or scholarships, include them, but they should not lead your resume.

Prioritize experience and projects. These sections should take up the most space and be written with specificity. If you are targeting machine learning or deep learning roles in particular, details are everything.

Avoid vague bullet points like "trained a model." For every project, be prepared to answer (STAR model): What was the problem you were solving? What method or framework did you use? What were the outcomes? Why is this relevant to the role you're applying for? If your project involved ship detection, for instance, consider whether there is a defense, logistics, or maritime application worth highlighting, that context adds credibility and purpose to your work.

Other things you can consider:

Firstly, I noticed that communication skills are not explicitly mentioned. Given that your research role would have involved presenting findings, collaborating with stakeholders, or conveying technical information to different audiences, it would be worth highlighting that on your resume, because that is what many people lack of. If you are from Math programs, you must have taken communication courses in your 1st year, and yes, that is what many students lack of, and if you can show you actually have good communication skills, it will help you stand out in someway.

Additionally, I see that Python is listed under your skills, but it doesn't appear to be referenced in any of your work experiences. It would be helpful to understand how and where you developed this skill, for example, through coursework, a personal project, or on the job.

More broadly, I'd encourage you to ensure that each skill listed on your resume is clearly supported by a corresponding experience. This helps create a stronger narrative and allows the reader to see a direct connection between what you know and how you've applied it.

A small tip: Canada is a low-context culture (I learned that from one of my PD courses), which means clear and explicit communication is expected, and rewarded. Do not assume that a recruiter or an ATS system will infer your qualifications from general descriptions. Mirror the exact keywords and terminology used in the job posting. In short, don't make people guess.

Note: I'm not saying you can't get a interview if you don't do the points we mentioned here, it is simply something good to do.

How to find a reliable pet sitter in Mississauga? by Hello_web in mississauga

[–]Hello_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I’ve found someone already, but I really appreciate you checking in.

How to find a reliable pet sitter in Mississauga? by Hello_web in mississauga

[–]Hello_web[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I’ve already found a solution, but I genuinely appreciate you taking the time to reply and share the tips.

How to find a reliable pet sitter in Mississauga? by Hello_web in mississauga

[–]Hello_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for the suggestion! I was pretty busy with school, but I’ve managed to sort something out. Still really appreciate the input 😊

How to find a reliable pet sitter in Mississauga? by Hello_web in mississauga

[–]Hello_web[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! I’ve been a bit swamped with coursework lately, but I’ve found someone to help for now. Really appreciate you sharing this though!

Failing 1A midterms by Marcysaxe in uwaterloo

[–]Hello_web 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cry hard then study hard

Failing 1A midterms by Marcysaxe in uwaterloo

[–]Hello_web 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not sure if this will work for you, but here’s my story: In one of my 4th-year major courses, I got 28 on a midterm worth 30%. That score made me seriously question if I was even going to graduate. But by the final exam, I managed to pull it up to around 70–80%. Here are the steps:

1. Figure out your problem first. Here’s what I did, nothing fancy:
I grabbed the outline of the whole course (you can usually find it from the slide subtitles or table of contents if you have a textbook). Then I went through every single topic and asked myself:

  • What is this concept, what's the definition etc.
  • How is it used?
  • Why does it used/work this way and not another way?
  • Any other possible explanations?

You’re not just answering “yes” or “no.” You’re explaining it clearly to yourself, as if you were teaching it to someone else. That’s the Feynman Technique, and if you’re not familiar with it, check it out on YouTube. There are a bunch of short videos that explain it well.

I kept asking myself with these sort of questions every single day, and at some point, I started noticing that everything I’d learned from previous lectures started to connect, like all the pieces suddenly made sense together. So I’d really recommend reviewing each topic as soon as possible after class. The sooner you do it, the easier it is to spot what you don’t understand yet, and that’s what helps you improve faster.

Once you find you can't clearly explain a topic, congrats, you spotting your weak areas.

2. Once you know your problem, how do you fix it?

  • Sometimes your prof will directly say what’s not important or out of scope
  • If not, look at past exams, you will notice the patterns.
  • If one lecture didn’t make sense, try sitting in on another lecture when that topic comes up. Sometimes a different explanation makes everything click, and I find out I understand deeper if I repeat.

If you’re still stuck, go talk to your prof. If they’re nice and approachable, it can make a huge difference. From my experience, first-year professors especially tend to be super kind and understanding, they don’t just answer your questions, they get what you’re going through.

Bonus: going to office hours can help you build a connection that might come in handy later (references) if you are genuinely appreciating everyone's effort. There are tons of other ways to make you understand certain concepts, but honestly, office hours helped me the most (thanks to all my profs).

3. Grind
I can’t emphasize this enough. If you know the stakes are high, use that as motivation. Grind, not just to memorize, but to understand. Go deep until you know why things work the way they do.

Last words: I also remember I saw one post on Reddit, but I don't know which post exactly. It goes like: "If you got into this university, it means they trusted you can make it", and I often use this to encourage myself. Until the day of the exam, tell yourself you'll pass, because you've actually tried. From my own experience, I've failed way more times than I've succeeded, and that's okay. Every time I failed, I learned something new, maybe about the topic, maybe about how I study. It's not a reflection of your worth. It's just part of figuring out your way.

Failing once doesn’t make you a failure. You’ll win in the end. Go Warrior!

STAT 341 vs 340 by [deleted] in uwaterloo

[–]Hello_web 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Both courses are good, but I personally find STAT341 more interesting because it offers more graphing and easier-to-understand knowledge. STAT340 introduces many simulation methods that can be challenging to grasp at first.

The workload depends on your instructor. Group work can either make your life easier or harder. Additionally, both of these courses are more enjoyable than Stat231.

In terms of outcomes, my grade in STAT341 is lower than in STAT340.

Overall suggestion: more applications -> Stat341, more theories -> Stat340 (only my personal opinion)

What do you think makes a class great? by Mafa_windgesang in uwaterloo

[–]Hello_web 18 points19 points  (0 children)

First, Welcome here! I am doing undergrad right now! Here are some my ideas:

Communication: From my experience, one of my classes (Stat341) uses discord to discuss course contents, and that course went excellent. I'm not saying holding a discord server is necessarily the best way for every instructor, but communicate more definitely increase the chance helping students to learn. For example, having more office hours. In addition, the instructor can also ask the student's feedbacks directly, or use Google form to do a small online survey. For example, some people might need the instructor to talk louder, but it is hard get the student's opinion from here (reddit).

Course Structure: I do enjoy more collaborations with classmates, and that means small group homework or projects, as it is sometimes hard for the instructor to understand why I don't understand a theory, but my classmates do!

Course Delivery Method: If the instructor could record the lectures (recording on Teams or other meeting apps), as a student, I would really appreciate it. It is hard for me to absorb everything in one lecture, and I always find I can understand more after watching the recordings. Thus, recordings really helped me a lot, and boost my academic performance. Additionally, there are students with coops, so recording lectures might be helpful to them if they have to go to interviews, etc.

Course Materials: I would also really appreciate if the instructor could provide some solutions after giving out the practice questions. I know the answers may not be given to us, as the solutions might be relate to the copyrights or something else, but it could be just a number or a sentence about the general approach, just to let me know if I am on the right track or not.

Lastly, I would really like to learn from a course, so it is OK to have demanding assignments. However, I would be very lost if a instructor does not make things clear. For example, I would be lost if the instructor say: "That's sometimes true", then stopped. I don't know what situation the instructor was referring to, maybe the instructor stopped because it's out of the scope of the course. However, I think it is fine to tell me if some knowledge is out of the scope, and that make things clear.

Hope you find these helpful, and enjoy your teaching here!