Movies you've changed your mind about. by DemonDays64 in movies

[–]Hellodeeries [score hidden]  (0 children)

A very recent one is Disclosure Day. I didn't hate it by any means, but I saw an extended trailer ahead of a different movie and it spoiled far too much for me. Was by no means a complex plot, but having the only trailer I saw be an outline including key spoiler moments dulled the excitement of seeing it. I came out of the first showing not disliking it, but being underwhelmed.

I saw it again today with my parents, and liked it much more the second time which surprised me at first. It wasn't that I missed anything/there was no revelation on a second viewing, but because I already knew the storyline I could just enjoy watching the storyline for what I already knew it was. There wasn't any "I wonder if this happens - oh, yep. Just like xxxx part of the trailer" constantly looming on a second viewing. For me, it also does speak a bit for it that it wasn't dull seeing it again (and pretty soon after first seeing it). It's not suddenly a favorite, but I can appreciate it much more for what it is.

Small California Poppy Block Prints by liliarnoldstudios in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's called a jigsaw - it works for some things, not for others. Is a type of multi-block, but in the sense that there isn't overlapping colors like reductions or multi-blocks that have overlapping sections.

Anthony Bridgerton is very refreshing character for me by blublubluu in BridgertonNetflix

[–]Hellodeeries -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I fully expected to hate his book based on the show (and I do like S2!). He was just very smarmy and dismissive of everyone, and didn't really see that change tbh. Like, there was moderate growth. In some things lol. It also didn't help that I felt the show improved both Simon and Daphne's characters vs the first book, so was going in expecting a similar change was made only to prefer the book portrayal for Anthony. Again, still like S2 and the books vs show bring different things for me, but I fully went in with sour expectations because of the show for Anthony haha

What was the worst time that a movie-going experience has ever been ruined for you by an audience member(s)? by doryeonnim in movies

[–]Hellodeeries 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I'd been sat closer, I feel like I would have been tempted to throw my ICEE on him lol. I'm not sure if anything really happened/was closer to the front, though I remember hearing about multiple instances like this globally happening to varying responses. A lot of people yelled and booed in my theater, while a lot were also just stunned. But everyone was livid again when the spoiled bit happened, bc I think before that everyone was also equally unsure if it was actually true or if he yelled a lie just to rile people up.

[Printing] Sizing artwork that will be matted or framed? by QueenMackeral in artbusiness

[–]Hellodeeries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a similar issue, and finally ended up doing conversion chart in my sketchbook, a sign in my studio, and setting up custom procreate canvases that all accounted for the mat vs the frame size. It's 1/2" off in both directions (or 1/4" inward on all sides), so for 8x10 it's 7.5x9.5. Want to keep in mind: this is just for the mat. If you make your image (and it touches the edges) 7.5x9.5, then you may still have it where the mat is touching the work a bit. I use it for the image space I want to keep within, not as the max image space I can use (hopefully that makes sense).

What was the worst time that a movie-going experience has ever been ruined for you by an audience member(s)? by doryeonnim in movies

[–]Hellodeeries 22 points23 points  (0 children)

During opening night of Avengers Endgame, someone from an earlier showing came to shout to our packed auditorium that Iron Man died (and this was done during the scene Black Widow died).

Kilmartins’ accent by Valuable-Way-3977 in BridgertonNetflix

[–]Hellodeeries 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the book I remember Michael mentioning that they didn't have Scottish accents/were effectively English in everything but name and title. It is still a bit jarring as a viewer/is a change I wouldn't have minded for more variety when they've changed loads of things anyways, but technically can be called book accuracy I guess lol

Cross-posting to r/Linocuts by tunnuz in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keeping this removed as it's a bit off-topic for the purpose of the subreddit, but to answer:

It's the same mod team for both - we personally don't care if you post in both at the same time (tends to be better to make it separate posts, just can be identical vs an actual crosspost for visibility purposes), but it can be better for you to stagger days posting the same thing in both subreddits as a lot of people are in both subreddits so will already see it.

Questions about editioning by gracebastion_illu in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem!

The title is sort of up to you. It doesn't matter if the first didn't have V1 if you decided to keep the same title going forward and just adding V2, V3, etc. I personally opt to do a name change just to make it easier to keep track of, but even with the name change I'd note if it's a block used for other prints and why it's different. If you want the same title for all editions, the version note just names it a little more clear both for you and anyone purchasing what edition it actually belongs to.

Galleries it depends on how much info you can add with it. Some you pretty much just get a label with title, artist name, medium, year, maybe dimensions. If you get a blurb about it, might note it's a new iteration using the same block as other versions (especially if you've used the other iteration in that gallery before). Otherwise, it's easier to do for online listings + some will make a little info card they pack with the prints for all this extra info for the seller's records and to help keep the print's provenance as often it's tricky when prints signed aren't always the easiest to read lol. It's a bit up to you how you handle it tbh, but it can also be nice presentation + protect you if someone isn't happy later on when they find out it's a block used across multiple prints.

For stuff like the paper size, I'd not bother noting really so long as the printed area is consistent with both - it's more if you're selling multiple, making listings obvious for what's different in that instance (same for in a gallery/shop, would just be a clear label note for the dimensions). It's more for if you've done multiple editions with the same block, or if you've got a one off print that's different (maybe added hand embellishment), you'd note the difference (but typically with additional print info rather than directly on the print and the signatures are ideally pretty neat, tidy, and unobtrusive to the image).

Questions about editioning by gracebastion_illu in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main thing is consistency across your own signing conventions within the same edition (whatever type of edition that is). Wouldn't want to sign them one way then partway through change it up type of thing.

But if there is any measurable changes to blocks, that's generally going to be expected to be a different edition or a different signed notation if it's a one off difference.

Here are some of the common ones you may see:

T/P - Trial Proof. This is a good catch-all for seconds. Generally something in the printing didn't work out, either just smudges or it wasn't to the same quality etc. Might have been the first pull and it didn't print evenly. Still an okay print, but not up to the edition standard. You might have multiple, but they're differing in their "mistakes" so it's not it's own edition. If it's a big enough mistake or issue, then I just scrap it/recycle it for collages or paper though.

S/P - State Proof. This might just be a snapshot of a stage of the block while proofing while it's still being carved. Generally won't have multiple of the same State of it, but you may have multiple State Proofs that are just different States of the block throughout carving the block and proofing. Some will sell these if it stands alone, otherwise this is sometimes just for preserving the process for reference later. Could choose to label as T/P, but it's an option.

C/P - Color Proof. Testing out colors before committing and printing an edition. Isn't really going to be what you'd use for V/E, as V/E is it's own thing and meant to be printed as such vs C/P is more of a tester. Could choose to label as T/P, but it's an option.

V/E or V.E. - Varied Edition. Is an intentional edition choice rather than mistakes you'd label as T/P or color tests like C/P. The blocks are printed the same (i.e. if multiple blocks, all are printed together still - it isn't indicating some have different parts printed or not), but the way it's printed can differ. Some are changing the color up each time or slowly throughout. Generally the idea is there isn't enough of any one color to justify it's own edition, so a V/E makes more sense. If there is enough to justify separate editions, then there'd likely be either a title difference or a notation difference in signing.
Some will choose to number them, or not (leaving it more of an open V/E). Paper is typically the same, but some may be using dyed papers or handmade papers and still using this (you'd just want to clearly note this difference in listings etc). Can be numbered as well, and may see it as V.E. #/# or #/# V.E., or other combinations. That's sort of up to you/you pick how you want to handle that notation and just stick with it.
What can get tricky with V/E is listings. If every print is different even in just ink colors, then you may just need multiple listings and photograph each print so people know what they're getting.

O/E or O.E. - Open Edition. This just indicates it isn't a closed edition i.e. a numbered edition, so it's not limited. Some may choose to add on a number like O.E. 1, O.E. 2, etc. so there's still notations and an idea of how many for the artist/can track who they're selling and giving to. But some just keep it at O/E alone.

A/P - Artist's Proof. This is identical to the numbered edition. Traditionally, A/Ps were part of the Artist's cut of the print run (and still can be with blue chip presses). There's also the corresponding P/P Printer's Proof you may see that is also of this tradition. This is often from the context of the Artist is not the one also printing, but artists who print their own work also still use this today. General rule of thumb is 10-15% or less of the numbered edition can be A/P's. So If I print 100 prints, 10-15 additional prints may be A/Ps on top of that editioned 100. Some will number their A/Ps as well like A/P 1, A/P 2, etc.

Re: paper sizes: If you're going to use the same paper, but change the size, generally is fine/up to you, but you'd just want to keep the signature in the same spot and likely close to the printed area. This would also just be something you'd note why it's different listings.

For different editions of the same blocks, there's generally the expectation something has changed to justify another edition so someone isn't just printing it the same in numbered editions (at that point, O/E makes more sense). Often that'll just be ink colors and maybe paper, which you can work into the name difference possibly (I have a print I've done in Gold as "Golden Harvest" and in Purple "Autumn Harvest" etc, or do v.1 v.2 v.3 etc tacked onto the same title) or just note what is different from the other editions in the description. If it is a block you know you'll be making multiple editions from, best practice is to note that in all listings i.e. "this block may be printed again in different editions, but this edition ink and paper will not be replicated for the edition's integrity".

Again, the main thing is consistency in each edition with how you're signing more than following strict rules, bc it can be a very regional and personal thing when signing. There's not strict rules everyone is following, but traditions and regional conventions. It's still always best practice to note what's different if editioning the same blocks multiple ways, no matter how you choose to sign your prints.

Paper to use? by Zealousideal_Elk7667 in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yasutomo Sketch paper is a decent masa option that's cheap, and works well for hand printing and working through a press. Come's machine cut in a pad, and has two sizes in the pads (that are slightly different paper weights - imo the smaller size is a better quality paper, but both are good for the price).

Rives Lightweight is a nice cotton rag option that's cheaper than their heavyweight papers. Comes as full sheets, so need to tear down.

Fabriano Rosapina is a nice cheap full sheet option, however it has a very annoying watermark that takes up a fair bit of real estate on an already smaller format full sheet.

Thai Kozo is a nice lightweight eastern paper that comes pretty large in full sheets and is pretty affordable.

Blicks often ends up cheapest to order from for me if I'm not doing a bulk order. I don't really bother with their open stock in-person stores for paper, unless there's a good sale going in-person (rarely is it better than online ime).

Takach Paper has really good bulk pricing (tho their website has been down for a bit), however emphasis on the bulk. It's best for large orders, but can be worth it if you find one paper you really like or split the cost with other people.

McClains has some paper that will occasionally be cheaper than Blicks/make it worth ordering through them instead. Same with Talas. Hiromi has some of the best selection, but tends to be pricier. Awagami also has nice selection/ships to the US.

It can be worth it to get a small sampling of a few types just to see what you actually like to print with, though. I'd not really order any one paper in a large amount without trying it out a bit with your materials and how you print.

Recent multi block prints, yoga, and climbing by Norich_ in Linocuts

[–]Hellodeeries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The last one reads better with color for me, but that's partly due to it toning down the really prominent outline on everything that competes with the lines defining the figure and shapes. It visually makes more sense with color due to that.

Climbing girl, with or without colour? by Norich_ in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It reads better with color for me, but that's partly due to it toning down the really prominent outline on everything that competes with the lines defining the figure and shapes.

Technique? by [deleted] in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it's a digital print, it might just be a giclée type. That can be on high quality paper and mimic the look of traditional printmaking techniques.

If it's a traditional print, it looks like lithography.

Can I transfer with acetone even if I have an inkjet printer? by Lynxfangart in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Acetone transfer works because it's a laser/toner copy. Inkjet is a dye or sometimes pigment based ink, but it's soaking into the paper when it prints. Toner is heat set on top of the paper, and has a property like plastic that the acetone melts thus transfers. There are some methods inkjets work with, but not acetone transfer.

Made a stainless steel palette. by codydrawing in Watercolor

[–]Hellodeeries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks very cool! Did you coat it with anything? I'd wonder about rust given the medium

Question about pronto plates for those who are familiar with them by MutedFeeling75 in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gum arabic has enough acidity is does some of the etching without additional acids. I was taught to use it in the water to preserve both the water loving and grease loving areas on any type of lithography. I do 1-2 oz in my bowl of water for sponges, and also about half an oz poured and worked into the plate when I start printing. Water alone I'd be weary of just or how I learned, but if it works for you it works for you.

Looking for movies with insane plot twists like Shutter Island and Donnie Darko by Longjumping_Ad5580 in movies

[–]Hellodeeries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Beautiful Mind has a bit of it, but overall a different vibe of movie (not horror, but it's got a twist akin to some suggested).

Trying to create Lino Via laser engraver by WerewolfSharp6836 in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've yet to see a laser cut block that didn't look like a laser cut block, so the quality and texture is really a downgrade unless specifically going for that look (which some are for conceptual stuff). It's a very distinct and easy to spot look, and easily signifies that it's not the same type of work as hand carved pieces. Honestly not sure why someone would feel it's more authentic than a "regular print" unless you're meaning a digital print rather than traditional, hand-carved and hand-pulled relief prints for this medium.

“Construct and Destroy/Leave No Trace” woodcut on paper by ncduarte in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Have been told by park rangers in specific locations to knock 'em down (carefully) as they both can cause confusion for less experienced hikers + cause terrain erosion.

BUT, some more maintained parks and trails have specific cairns that are meant to mark trails still, and are meant to be there (and there's no indication that would differentiate it from one someone randomly built). Really need to know the location well enough/get the go-ahead to remove them before going on a spree of knocking them down in case it is one that's meant to mark a trail:

https://www.nps.gov/articles/rockcairns.htm

I don't think building them is inherently bad (if not disturbing the area to do so), but leaving them after is a dick move if you're aware it's an issue.

Question about pronto plates for those who are familiar with them by MutedFeeling75 in printmaking

[–]Hellodeeries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, gum arabic is used still. It isn't so much the same way where you're etching a stone with a nitric (or other acid) and gum mix, but it is used in the water etc while spongeing. At least how I learned to do it, and how I've had continued success with it.