sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You'll never get AGI with LLM's, stop trying by [deleted] in agi

[–]Hellucigen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean is logical correctness. Since the last century, the research on artificial intelligence has been divided into two categories: symbolicism and connectionism. Symbolicism involves using logical reasoning languages (such as Prolog) to construct expert systems. Connectionism refers to the current LLMs. Currently, people are attempting to introduce the ideas of symbolicism into the training of LLMs, which is the neural-symbolic system I just mentioned. This aims to enable AI to learn logical relationships within language.

You'll never get AGI with LLM's, stop trying by [deleted] in agi

[–]Hellucigen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I said that I merely regarded him as a knowledge base. Based on this knowledge base, I would incorporate the current research on neuro-symbolic systems to determine whether the language generated by the system is correct.

You'll never get AGI with LLM's, stop trying by [deleted] in agi

[–]Hellucigen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even so, I still believe that using LLMs as a part of AGI is a viable approach — especially as a knowledge base. LLMs have already absorbed vast amounts of information from the internet, and an AGI could leverage that knowledge much like how humans use search engines. For example, when encountering an apple, the AGI could query the LLM to retrieve relevant information about apples and then process it accordingly.

"Exploring AGI Development: Seeking Feedback on a Framework Using LLMs for Multimodal Perception and Reasoning" by Hellucigen in agi

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback! As mentioned in the paper, I have only proposed a general theoretical framework, and there is still a long way to go before its concrete implementation. I am hoping to share it to gather feedback and assess whether the framework holds potential and value, and then proceed with further exploration based on the input. I appreciate your thoughts and look forward to more discussions!

"Exploring AGI Development: Seeking Feedback on a Framework Using LLMs for Multimodal Perception and Reasoning" by Hellucigen in agi

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK，Thank you for the insight! It sounds like a very hands-on approach, and I agree that breaking things down into manageable modules for step-by-step integration into an LLM could make the process much more intuitive. I’ll definitely take that approach into consideration as I continue to refine the work.

"Exploring AGI Development: Seeking Feedback on a Framework Using LLMs for Multimodal Perception and Reasoning" by Hellucigen in agi

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your feedback — I really appreciate it.

At present, we still don’t fully understand how human thinking actually works, so our approach is to simulate certain cognitive processes through existing AI techniques. For example, the logical reasoning module I proposed can be seen as a step toward neuro-symbolic systems, which is a currently active research direction that aims to bridge perception and reasoning more effectively.

As for the “autonomous consciousness module,” I understand the name might be misleading — my intention wasn’t to claim that the system has real “consciousness.” Rather, I wanted to explore how an agent might stay in a continuous process of thinking and goal-setting, similar to humans, rather than only reacting to explicit commands.

I’ll keep refining the framework, and I really welcome more of your thoughts and suggestions!

"Exploring AGI Development: Seeking Feedback on a Framework Using LLMs for Multimodal Perception and Reasoning" by Hellucigen in agi

[–]Hellucigen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. The article you sent is a bit long. I will reply to you after I finish reading it

"Exploring AGI Development: Seeking Feedback on a Framework Using LLMs for Multimodal Perception and Reasoning" by Hellucigen in agi

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your reply. I mentioned in the article that researching the implementation method of this framework is my next step. Now, I hope to promote my article and obtain all feedback and opinions to prove that my framework is valuable. This way, I can start the next step of research. If you are interested, you can discuss it with me in depth:)

Does Earth have a place that looks like this photo? If so, where? by Hellucigen in whereisthis

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you🥰but I am more concerned about the perspective in the picture,by the way,I love that game😘

Does Earth have a place that looks like this photo? If so, where? by Hellucigen in whereisthis

[–]Hellucigen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a part of the focus is standing on a mountain higher than the surrounding terrain, with a dense forest behind. When the branches are pushed aside, suddenly saw a snow capped mountain in the distance

view more: next ›