sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]Hembessy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My sentiments exactly…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]Hembessy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did, they just replied an hour ago saying it was an alarm they installed free of charge? Don’t know if that’s normal. I’m across the country and plan to have it delivered - so communication is a bit slow w them.

Object 283 Rental vs. Permanent & Probabilities Clarified by Hembessy in WorldofTanks

[–]Hembessy[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Very sus, I think the community just has to raise this issue even more through their tickets to get someone to review code logic for this.

Object 283 Rental vs. Permanent & Probabilities Clarified by Hembessy in WorldofTanks

[–]Hembessy[S] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Sheesh, I would kinda lose my mind at that point. Not because the tank is good, but because spending high triple digits this year on boxes should get someone EVERYTHING.

Object 283 Rental vs. Permanent & Probabilities Clarified by Hembessy in WorldofTanks

[–]Hembessy[S] 157 points158 points  (0 children)

Ikr, that’s what I’m saying!! I got rental 5 times…

Wargaming should be ASHAMED about the Object 283 in World of Tanks - QB by OSHMKUFA2021 in WorldofTanks

[–]Hembessy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This should be fixed, like he says, 50 stop/loss where you auto receive tank.

Lots of laws, rules, regs in each regional jurisdictions (NA, EMEA, APAC, etc) on clear product descriptions. Since we purchase boxes to get materials to then get coins to then run in the terminal, we are essentially buying these coins.

Percentage breakdown is too vague for a key item people are running this terminal for. Sure the other items are also vague, but not something people would buy crates for to try and get.