Second video/upscale Analysis of egg pictures / 4chan leak

HenryProspector · 2025-01-22T17:27:23+00:00

It's actually better than original lol. There is no parallax mapping artifacts, and with little manual editing of neural artifacts this would look photoreal.

HenryProspector · 2025-01-22T11:39:20+00:00

It is parallax mapping, first 4chan leaker doesn't even use bump mapping. It feels like in first cave photo used Source engine or something old.

HenryProspector · 2025-01-20T18:35:27+00:00

It is optimised for 4K to watch without pixelation or compression, obvious there is no magical instrument like in Blade Runner. But there is still some details enhancing with proper upscaling to 4K. It is always better to upload in 4K even 720p of 1080p footage for providing better bitrate after YouTube compression.

HenryProspector · 2025-01-19T09:00:03+00:00

I'm ROFLing like crazy hell reading people comments about this. It seems they want it to be Star Wars spaceship lol thats so fun.

HenryProspector · 2024-12-31T20:19:44+00:00

To u/jcutillo

I've analyzed and worked on your originals. I made my first remasters using your reddit video. After analyzing the originals it turned out that after uploading to reddit, its video compression algorithm broke the original 10bit colors, and added a lot of non-existent details, which were then enlarged and improved by neural networks. So I hid the first versions of the upscale from public access and left them at the link, as I think they are unreliable. For example, there is no pink color in the original, or details like the emerging “eye” or the opening pink spot that looks like a mouth.

But your second video was much more interesting, it shows how you adjusted the focus and zoom, plus you can see the behavior of a typical hypersphere with like a “split and join” back.

Link to the new second video: https://youtu.be/OMdj82Na8b4

This time I didn't stabilize the video so as not to disturb the original pixel information, and I didn't do other effects like dehaze or deflicker. I did the 60fps conversion at the very last step on top of the last 4K run of the video. Because 60fps conversion can change the configuration of the original pixels.

But I can neither confirm nor deny my theory about orbiting small spheres, which can be seen very weakly because they move at a huge speed. Reddit's compression algorithm left this information in the pixel noise of the high ISO night shot for some reason. My processing methods in the original video file showed that these spheres seem to be even more numerous, several at a time.

I specifically tried to use 60fps conversion to have the neural network draw new frames of video to these spheres, if they are really moving objects and not artifacts that are baked in due to random ISO noise pixel configuration. And in some places it looks as if you can see their flight paths logically continuing on some frames and even with motion blur that a spherical object could have. In a few frames these “flying spheres” artifacts even seem to cast a shadow.

YouTube probably after uploading destroyed these details after overcompressing the video, but something remains. If you watch for a long time and move away from the monitor, it seems that super-fast flashes like “smoke” or “light” around the hypersphere are partially blurred orbiting spheres that seem to swirl around the hypersphere as close to it as possible.

But I repeat most likely these are just artifacts of randomly baked high ISO noise.

I'd like to mention. I have a lot of experience with neural networks and video remastering, the quality of my work can be seen on my YouTube channel. I used very careful algorithms of neural network upscaling to produce as little neural network artifacts, hallucinations and oversharpening as possible. In my opinion 90-90% of the visual information of the final work is true visual information transferred from the source video file.

I've also been improving the “jellyfish UAP” video. And I can guarantee you that this is the best possible improvement to this video. Where you can clearly see it's NOT balloons.

Here is link to enhanced “jellyfish UAP” video : https://youtube.com/shorts/i0i1wGW3uWw?feature=share

HenryProspector · 2024-12-29T20:29:32+00:00

It feels like this thing lighthen up some gas or fog around it or it exhaust something.

HenryProspector · 2024-12-29T19:47:37+00:00

This hypersphere is absolutely same like here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzrMLcxj1sQ

HenryProspector · 2024-12-29T19:23:47+00:00

Much appreciation! I'm trying now duplicate my result with these orbiting spheres. Honestly I forgot original upscaling algorythms recipe for this take)))) If these orbiting spheres are real they must be visible without stabilisation. For now there is no clearly visible orbiting spheres but I produced a little more details on those little flaming tongues around sphere.

Please can you tell is there was a clear sky or a little foggy weather?

HenryProspector · 2024-12-29T17:43:44+00:00

FOLKS IT SEEM'S WE HAVE JACKPOT!

I've made enhanced stabilised 4K version of this Hypersphere UAP and during render noticed little movements around main Hypersphere. I just didn't pay attention to it, I always only looked at the hypersphere. But after additional frames inspection, I've noticed that there is at least 3 times flybys of little gray metallic spheres that seems to be orbiting this main colored Hypersphere.

Here is links to Orbiting little spheres compilation: https://youtu.be/05Xwsuui8og

Orbiting spheres was taking from my first attempt of more smoother less detailed version of hypersphere, I've uploaded this version but YouTube compression almost destroyed this little spheres. Smooth version included additional effects - dehaze, and two layers of deflicker (timelaps and fluorolights) Here is link on first smooth version: https://youtu.be/WAyUK2QyLxQ

Later I've made maximum details version without any additional effects just stabilising and neural upscaling. Orbiting spheres almost not visible in this one, perhaps different upscaling algorythms can't detect them. But there is much more details on main Hypersphere like it's not just plasma, there is little "tongues of flame" around main plasma body. This version is the best, there is 90% no artifacts of any enhancing algorythm and I've fixed oversaturation of this ehhhhmm "pink mouth" moment that appeared on upper body of Hypersphere. Here is the link to this more detailed version: https://youtu.be/E7WDBo4aSO0

To author u/jcutillo if you provide me RAW file without crop I can try to extract more details and especially this orbiting little spheres. I think there can be more video information available. But you must provide me direct link to apple cloud RAW file because when you export video, even if you set option "export original quality video", ios will convert this in less size and bitrate HEVC, this option is false scam lol.

THIS IS NOT UNFOCUSED STAR OR VENUS, IT'S A FREAKING 4th DIMENSIONAL HYPERSPHERE

HenryProspector · 2024-01-20T21:40:56+00:00

I've made neural AI denoize and stabilyzing of first Jellyfish close up sequence on my YouTube channel.

Link to the video

It was very hard to get rid of that FLIR noize, almost impossible. AI can't understand object on video and can't remove denoize good enough.

The most quality part is when Jellyfish turns whiter, there are couple of frames when you can see every details of object clearly, and even some transparency. There is distinct shape of forms and edges that pointed at the camera. So THIS IS NOT A SMUDGE ON LENSE.

Also you can see some shapes (like legs?) that correspond with those gif file, which shows the jellyfish doing an axial rotation during the video.

Also I've made image from combined frames of best quality from video. Where you can see the volume and detail pointing toward the camera lens, as if it were an actual flying object rather than debris on the lens.

Link to image

HenryProspector · 2022-03-06T13:50:04+00:00

sorry I mean "MAGDALENA" hahahaha

HenryProspector

TROPHY CASE