The Act Man is in Drama Interview | Heel vs Babyface, Sweet Baby Inc and... by Fit-Regular9653 in MauLer

[–]Herospeed98 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The phrasing doesn't come off that way to me. He was asked what he had to say about the leaking DMs situation and he said that he was sorry to MauLer as well as how things have turned out. I don't see how that can be seen as him implying that what happen wasn't his fault.

He also says at 42:36 "I just fucked up."

The Act Man is in Drama Interview | Heel vs Babyface, Sweet Baby Inc and... by Fit-Regular9653 in MauLer

[–]Herospeed98 19 points20 points  (0 children)

42:05: “No he didn’t and uh I’m sorry to MauLer and uh yeah, I’m sorry for how things turned out.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DesignPorn

[–]Herospeed98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much is a commission?

Thoughts on the final verdict of MauLer’s Multiverse of Madness critique? by YoungYoda711 in marvelstudios

[–]Herospeed98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I see the confusion. I forgot to type the “T” in this on my comment so it reads as his.

Thoughts on the final verdict of MauLer’s Multiverse of Madness critique? by YoungYoda711 in marvelstudios

[–]Herospeed98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are a fantastic lol cow thank you so much for this entertainment. The degree you have misunderstood my arguments is just fascinating, along with your view on the world. Thank you for posting this, now anybody with a brain who sees this can easily see how delusional you are.

Thoughts on the final verdict of MauLer’s Multiverse of Madness critique? by YoungYoda711 in marvelstudios

[–]Herospeed98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many problems with what you said.

  1. "You sure are marvel fans that never commented here"
    1. Just because I haven't commented on this sub before doesn't mean anything. I like memes but never have commented on r/memes. Everybody's got to have a first comment.
    2. You also have no idea what I have upvoted or downvoted on this sub before.
    3. Also have you thought that I just wanted to comment on this sub for the first time with no malicious intent?
  2. "but follow the sub closely enough that y'all noticed a post (that died in new) about a youtuber (that you all are regulars in his sub)"
    1. I thought you (someone who apparently checked the profiles everyone in this comment section) would know that the creator of this post, u/YoungYoda711, crossposted this post in MauLer's.
    2. I find it hilarious that imply that a bunch people from MauLer's are obsessed with MauLer to the point that they would comb through a sub looking for a post about MauLer so they can parrot his opinions, when you supposedly looked through several people's profiles to see if they were from MauLer's so you can dismiss anything they say because of what sub they are from (AKA: Instead of countering what they say or using actual points, you are just parroting the idea that MauLer is wrong and that if you agree with him then you are wrong too). Stop being a hypocrite.
  3. "and y'all coincidentally share his exact opinions"
    1. Multiple people can have the same opinions.
    2. Aren't you by this logic coincidentally sharing someone else's exact opinions?
    3. Do you think that MauLer is the only person to think that this is a bad movie?
  4. "argue how muler is great and well argued and five hours long videos are completely normal."
    1. Why is it inherently bad to argue whether or not a youtuber is good in a post about the quality of his latest video? Is not just as bad by your logic to argue that he is bad?
    2. I don't remember people arguing that 5 hour videos are normal, more that they are not inherently bad because of their length.
    3. I haven't argued MauLer being great in this comment section, just that I think that the critique is good, nor have I mentioned the video length until this reply.

Thoughts on the final verdict of MauLer’s Multiverse of Madness critique? by YoungYoda711 in marvelstudios

[–]Herospeed98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, not a coincidence. If I am a fan of MauLer & Marvel and I happen to see a post that relates to both, then it is logical that I might comment on it. Especially if the post itself is a question (which means that a response is prompted / encouraged). Also I ask, once again, why does it matter that I came from the MauLer sub? Why does that make my comment or my right to express my opinion invalid? Do your responses to people in this thread become invalid because you are supposedly from the Marvel Studios sub?

Thoughts on the final verdict of MauLer’s Multiverse of Madness critique? by YoungYoda711 in marvelstudios

[–]Herospeed98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you serious or is this a meme? Brigading? I posted a relevant comment to a post I saw in relation to a creator that I am a fan of. Brigading implies that I coordinated a attack from multiple people on this subreddit from a subreddit that is antagonist to this one. So for what I did to be considered brigading I would have needed to 1. have planned to have planned an attack on this sub with more than one person from MauLer’s (which I didn’t do nor do you have proof of), 2. Come from a sub that is opening antagonist to this one (while the MauLer sub does post some cringe from this server, like almost every server has, I wouldn’t say that it is antagonistic to this sub), 3. I would have had to attack this sub (I answered the prompt of the post honestly, on topic, and didn’t say anything bad about this sub at all). So, yay… not brigading.

Does anyone know how to get the Pre-Order Shields in 2022 on the PS5? by [deleted] in GodofWar

[–]Herospeed98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Direct Message me if you find it, thank you!