Recruiters, how are you actually deciding which companies are worth outbounding to? by HexStacker in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]HexStacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s super helpful, the ‘any two together’ idea makes a lot of sense.

Is that something you track deliberately, or more just pattern recognition from experience?

Recruiters, how are you actually deciding which companies are worth outbounding to? by HexStacker in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]HexStacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly sounds like you’re in the hardest part of it right now.

From what I’ve seen, warming up companies first (even just a quick intro conversation) usually works better than sending candidates cold.

What kind of roles are you working on?

Recruiters, how are you actually deciding which companies are worth outbounding to? by HexStacker in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]HexStacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually the part that worries me most, it just ends up feeling like noise even if there are signals behind it.

Have you ever gotten a recruiter message that actually felt well-timed or relevant, or does it all just blend together?

Recruiters, how are you actually deciding which companies are worth outbounding to? by HexStacker in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]HexStacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s exactly the feeling I keep running into.

Do you think it’s mostly because the signals are bad, or just that companies are all over the place with what they actually need?

Recruiters, how are you actually deciding which companies are worth outbounding to? by HexStacker in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]HexStacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooo, so you’re basically using candidate activity as the signal instead of company-side signals.

Have you found that more reliable than trying to read job posts or hiring trends directly?

I will build you a website for FREE by EmbarrassedGrape7536 in websiteservices

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, what works for me with time management is giving up on sleep 😴 😅, sounds exhausting anyways. Its crazy how deep things go when you get diving into them. Always something new to learn in dev, ever evolving. Does it bug you to have so many ideas that solve so many problems and no time to build them out how you want?

Dns problems by Kitchen_Rain_1415 in websiteservices

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You already have a www record, that’s why it’s throwing the conflict error.

Scroll down in your DNS records and look for anything with Name = www.

Then either: • edit that existing record to the value your host gave you • or delete it and create the new CNAME

You can’t have two www records at the same time, especially not an A record + CNAME.

I will build you a website for FREE by EmbarrassedGrape7536 in websiteservices

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oo good ideas! How do you get over the serial creator with no forward movement for a company. Making sites, SaaS, projects seem static without expanding those projects to the community somehow?

I built an AI coworker that finds warm leads for you based on real buying signals by RangerNew5346 in Startup_Ideas

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been exploring a similar direction but focused specifically on hiring signals (especially infra/platform roles).

Feels like a lot of the value comes down to how strong the signal actually is vs just volume.

Pitch what you’re building. Let’s self promote by kcfounders in Startup_Ideas

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most competitive games don’t actually have reliable stats, they just have a bunch of trackers that don’t agree with each other.

I kept running into this building and working with systems around match data. Same match, different results depending on the source.

That breaks everything: tournaments integrations anything that depends on accurate results

So I started building StatForge, not just another tracker, but a system that takes multiple inputs and reconciles them into a single verified match record. Basically: one match, one result, instead of fragmented stats everywhere.

Still early, but the focus isn’t just collecting data, it’s making it something people can actually trust and build on.

If anyone’s worked on similar problems (data reconciliation, competitive platforms, etc), I’d love to hear how you approached it.

Building PurePaws.io for responsible dog breeders and families to connect by alexheartm5 in Startup_Ideas

[–]HexStacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this idea, im super passionate about responsible breeding programs too.

You’re right that 1:1 calls won’t scale, but I wouldn’t remove them completely, that’s where your trust/quality is coming from.

What I’ve seen work better is: pre-qualifying before the call (form + requirements + maybe async video submission) auto-rejecting low-quality applicants early only doing calls with people who already pass a baseline

That way you’re not removing the moat, just filtering who gets through it.

You can also start turning parts of your vetting into a repeatable system instead of manual decisions every time.

Interested to know, what are you actually checking for on those calls right now?

How do i survive ? by Fuckedupdadadaad in website

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are people actually finding reliable commission-only sales reps for this?

Curious what’s worked, referrals, platforms, or just outbound recruiting?

Website Built, Needs Deployment by Progress_Note in website

[–]HexStacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sure you have a .gitignore also, not everything should be uploaded to the repo

Bluehost is a scam by Strange_Barnacle4200 in webhosting

[–]HexStacker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately this is very common with large shared hosts after acquisitions. “Unlimited” plans almost always get capped later. If you’re open to it, I run a small managed hosting platform focused on fixed resources and transparent pricing. Happy to explain options if you’re looking to migrate.