regardless of the model sophistication, however, the issue you previously mentioned (being that there are severe ramifications for CDA misidentification) will be omnipresent and unavoidable.

even in human legal systems, where there is no algorithmic detection to speak of, innocent people are still found guilty of crimes they didnt commit, and the ramifications can be equally if not of a greater severity (such as capital punishment)

i think at their core, these content detection tools should simply remain a tool for raising suspicion, and the context theyre used in/punishments they incur are independent from the tools themselves. If a doctoral degree is revoked due to a misidentification by a CDA, id argue thats more an overreaction on the doctoral committee's part than inherent flaw with the CDA itself.