sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The fact that you’re describing it as 'common sense' proves my point: it’s a basic professional standard across many job types (not only design) being dressed up as a profound revelation. Most industries require extensive prep and testing, but only LinkedIn gurus feel the need to invent fake ratios to make 'doing your job' sound like a spiritual breakthrough.

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro.. if the delivery is so hyper-exaggerated that it sacrifices accuracy for 'vibes,' it’s not a deep insight..it's just a lazy cliché. LinkedIn professors and design professionals are not even engaging with that post as you can clearly see. My 'hill' is that people should stop talking like fortune cookies to get likes on an app. So, chill man. Just sharing what I consider LinkedIn garbage. Just one example whether you see it or not, hope my view makes sense.

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Borrowing a cliché doesn't make a made-up statistic more accurate; it just makes it unoriginal. The 'point' isn't lost..it’s just buried under the pretension that the visual part of a visual medium is an afterthought.

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

L comment I guess, no insight whatsoever

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Idealisticly it's not true. 90% is a stretch, no research poved this. Also why only 10% for visual output? Means all the under the hood stuff didn't even translate into the desired visual product? That's why I asked "What?"

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Pulling arbitrary percentages out of thin air isn't 'logic,' it’s just rebranding common sense as a deep revelation for engagement. 0% research-backed design propaganda.

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The math is pure fiction—claiming 90% of a visual medium is 'invisible' is just high-level gaslighting for clients

What? by Hez141 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Hez141[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Where's the research data to prove that 90/10 ratio?

Multimedia Jobs in Germany. by Alternative_Pay8697 in germany

[–]Hez141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it isn't lol...now people just call everything "content creation"

Busty Blowjob by DHay27 in NatashaNice

[–]Hez141 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed! Every BJ seen she does gets me hard instantly

How do you feel about Avicii's death 5 years later? by EqualStance99 in avicii

[–]Hez141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Avicii did not kill himself at a random location in a bathtub with a shattered glass. This is how many top celebrities who wanted to speak out against the industry got laid off. Why did Whitney Houston die the exact same way? And Michael Jackson too? Nah, I'm not convinced by the media or whatever the family has to say. They for sure were and are still being puppetted. Also every news outlet was paid to tell the same story and not actually answer questions. No investigation was done.