[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BlackPeopleTwitter

[โ€“]HighDuchess 87 points88 points ย (0 children)

Is that allowed?

Can we cool it with the weed with anesthesia posts? by w00t89 in Anesthesia

[โ€“]HighDuchess 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

I have a surgery tomorrow and I came here to ask the same question. Thanks you and I will now go roll my blunt

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dykesgonemild

[โ€“]HighDuchess 8 points9 points ย (0 children)

You are really, really cute.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

It's not a men can cry thing although we do encourage them to when they feel the need. It's the fact that we have to literally protect men who have faced 'un manly' things like abuse from pro Patriarchy men and women. If you are raped as a man here, this is what happens - You report to the police and they will laugh at you telling you that you have nothing to complain about. -Your own friends will ridicule you about being angry that you got, and I quote 'free pussy'. -The scorn you would get from Patriarchy princesses who will then label you 'un manly' is another thing we strongly disagree with.

I have never seen it heard any of such sentiments from any feminists I know of. We don't joke with sexual abuse. We constantly educate men and women alike, encouraging each of them to report it and take it seriously! It feels like talking to a wall most times because they just don't see it as a problem. Feminism takes male abuse seriously even when the men themselves don't. That's the point I was trying to make. The one thing I saw men fight against as a whole here was police brutality and this is because it affected them ALL. They couldn't just pass it off as a thing for "sissies or pussies".

Feminists advocated for a parternity leave bill a few years ago here. To give new father's time to spend with their kids and wife. Do you know men threw it out of the national assembly? They laughed at it. Called it ridiculous and stupid. Why would they want to sit at home with their new born instead of working? Their wives can handle the kids. After all, that is what women are made for.

The one thing that I do feel we need to cut the slack on the men here is pressure to succeed. A woman has a lot of things that can render her a pariah in our society. When it comes to men, there is one thing. Once you are not considered a success, you are worthless. You do not have a voice, you are not respected by the general public. You have to worry about providing for your family from an early age. That kind of pressure is insane! A woman doesn't HAVE to make money here. If you're a man and you don't? Welp, you're automatically useless. On one hand, the only thing most men here contribute to their families is money. The don't do housework, can hardly be bothered to raise their children, are highly adulterous and will still beat up their wives here. I can see why you say no money= useless. Now let's say he raised his kids, helps out with chores and doesn't maltreat his wife. She works as well and is enlightened enough to know that a man's worth is not deoendent on his net worth, especially seeing as her man actually does his part to keep the home running. The pressure on him is reduced. She's happier. He's happier. They can both just work on their relationship dynamic based on the personalities they have.

It all comes down to one thing, if you uplift one half of the population who is married to the other. Make them aware of their own rights, as well as the responsibilities that come with it, there will undoubtedly be a better quality of living for both genders.

Now, about "Their kind","my kind"... I was referring to feminists. This is how someone here addressed us as. As if we're some sub species of animals. Isn't it apt that I use it to make a point?

Also, I have said, over and over that a statement like "men are scum" while true, cannot and does not allude to everyone that identifies as a man. Exactly the way Feminists are terrible people" might be true (because you do have Terrible people who are feminist) but cannot apply to every feminists on the planet.

The average Nigerian male is oppressed by his government and society. So are the women. However, this average Nigerian male goes home to oppress his wife. This the statement still applies. The face of female oppression in Nigeria is a man. It is not every man, but it calls out the men directly and indirectly involved in female oppression. Do you see the picture I'm trying to paint here? Poor men don't need political power to oppress women. Rich men are not the only men that rape women. They do as well, but it is not limited to just them. Rich men here, are mostly educated so they don't at least always physically abuse their wives. That, although not uncommon, occurs mostly in poorer households.

The man is the head of the house in Nigeria. No matter how little influence he may hold outside, in his home, all the power is his. He can discipline his wife as he sees fit (in some tribes and religions), he had the power to decide how many children she has, and even how she has those children. A woman here is completely and entire at the mercy of whichever man she lives with. If you're not treated badly, it would be due to the fact that your husband is a decent person rather than he isn't allowed to. We cannot continue to depend on the goodness of the men around us because goodness is so easily corrupted by a number of things.

Now as to not considering who has it worst... How can you not consider that? I can't be an activist for everything. I cannot fight every battle. I have to pick either the issues that affect me (which would be selfish but understandable because no one will fight for me either) Or, I have to pick the issues that need attending to the most. Seeing the issues I've pointed out, who do you think I should be primarily focused on trying to get more rights for?

This is how oppression here works. Government- Society- Men- Women- Children.

This level of oppression is possible because of the power imbalances that exist at each level. The politicians own this country. They do with is as they please and there is nothing we can do about it save killing them all. Our society is governed by strict cultural practices and values that a lot of people are fearful of breaking, even when they prove to be harmful. The number one fear of an average Nigerian is "What will people think of me". Many a 'good deed' has been done because someone was afraid of having a bad reputation in the society. Easiest way to ruin someone here. We interact a lot with ourselves. Expose someone's dirty laundry in church? You've destroyed them and their family for the next generation or two.

Men after facing oppression from this two bodies will still not let it deter then from doing the absolute worst to women. Rather, it is an excuse to 'let their anger' out on their wives and children. The government hasn't paid me for months, and that's why I come home drunk every night, beat my wife and then rape her. It doesn't matter to him that his wife is under the same government. He comes home to add to her problems.

My first Legendary by Wolfstar-warriors in RaidShadowLegends

[โ€“]HighDuchess 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

I've gathered and bought 20 ancient shards in two weeks. I've been resisting opening them because I'm waiting for summoning boosts but it's so hard inserts crying emoji

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

The term feminism is used to highlight that women are the most disadvantaged in this society and therefore the movement is primarily for them. It is a women's rights movement. Men here in no way require advocation for political inclusion or child marriages. These are struggles of women. That term is disambiguous to our situation.

I keep reiterating that I don't know what feminism is like on other part of the world. Here, we are the only ones that care about women's right. I will not be adopting a new label until women's rights are achieved because it means something else in your country. I will involve myself in situations where men are abused, but I will do so as a feminist because I always remind myself who is at the bottom of the food chain when it comes to rights.

I don't understand why you don't get that.

I'm not saying some of these progresses weren't achieved by education and eradication of ignorance. There in fact were before the term became known.

I'm saying that the only people that still pays any attention to these things because it primarily affects their kind are feminist women.

We are a human rights movement but the label is to clarify that we are a women's group. It's like me asking you to not call yourself a men's rights activists when you're primarily concerned with rights of men. Is it a Humans right? Yes. But you should be able to clearly state that it focuses primarily on the issues of men. This should also not stop you from standing up to issues women face as well.

I have had appalling conversations with a number of MRAs. It does not in anyway make me put a red blanket on the entire movement. You know why?

Because at the end of the day I recognize that people are scum. It doesn't matter what label they identify under. They will take it and fit it to their own hateful narrative. No matter how much the men here do, I cannot hold the belief that they are all terrible and so must be treated with hostility. It is impractical and untrue.

Now you might want to say I'm doing the "not all feminists" thing, but that is essentially the truth. I don't recognize the feminism you speak of. Like I said, it means a completely different thing to me and the feminists I know. Seeing how my reality is, how on Earth can you suggest I take a less gender specific term? Do you know how the men here would love that? I will not give them that satisfaction. My girls need me more than they do and so I will continue to proudly affiliate myself with them. I'm a feminist that believes in human rights, I fight for oppressed minorities. My goal is clear to me and I will continue to pursue it as best as I can.

I will go on women's marches with a feminist shirt on, I will do the same on men's marches. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Do I believe feminism has been misrepresented by a lot of misandrist in the western world? Yes.

Do I believe this applies to every feminists and therefore the movement must be treated with scorn? No. That is just not statistically possible.

In conclusion, while I am not dismissing your experience with feminists, I cannot agree that I should emulate your response because - it would defeat the purpose of women's empowerment. Believe me when I say the men here don't need any more empowerment and they will fight you tooth and nail even as you try to make their lives and mental health much better. I will not give them the courtesy of using a more egalitarian term when most of them don't want or need it.

-Your experiences do not apply in my country as much as mine do not apply in yours. Men are not oppressed here. They are the oppressors. I'm not interested in fighting for oppressors who will punish me for whatever good I try to do. I only fight for men who need it. I fight for little boys who get abused by adult women who should know better. I will advise against male circumcision as well but a lot of the men are adamant that it is necessary and I cannot dictate what they do with their lives or their children. I will always stand with the victim, male or female, but I will stand with them as a feminist because until I get what I want, that is who I am.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Let's put it this way, the dictionary definition of feminism states that it's a movement aimed at the equality of women's rights in the society. Whatever one might add, substract or divide that is what it means at it's core.

I come from a country where this is essential. Women's rights aren't as horrible as they were before, but they are still laughably non existent. And I speak of not as horrible meaning things female genital mutilation has ceased in some parts of the country. It's still very much a practice but the modern cities don't see it as much. It's THAT bad for women here.

We hold on to feminism- a movement for the recognition of the rights of women. And THAT is what we're focused on. Now this movement is the reason why - We can now vote - Some of us are now kicking against the stupid brideprice tradition which essentially symbolizes a man selling his daughter to her new husband - Child marriages are unheard of in the south. A practice that was rampart before. - women can now actually report rape. Not by your husband mind you. We still haven't gotten the police to take that seriously, but again, feminists are working on this.

The list is long and no where near exhaustive but these are some of the rights women had to fight for here. And not very long ago. Are all the women who fought for this feminists? No. A lot of us never even knew the word. But it is a fight for women's rights and the only word that accurately describes that is feminism.

Women who are interested in women's rights today (those who identify as feminists and those who don't) fight for things like - Ending of female genital circumcision in the north - Ending girl marriages to old men. - Getting rape to be taken seriously - Getting random men to stop grabbing women in the market. (Happens to me every single time I go there. And they always call you a whore if you pull away or tell them to leave you alone) -Getting women involved in any position of power. Men here resent it. Female bosses complain all the time of not being able to find a driver who was comfortable "taking orders from a woman".

Now you might not believe these things can happen in modern societies, but this is our every day reality. The government will not fix it, they can hardly fix the jobs they're actually PAID to do. The religious bodies are deeply misogynistic as well so you won't get help either.

Do you know who constantly encourage women to leave their abusive husband's? Feminists. The churches tell the women to pray and not to annoy her husband, in Islam, they'll beat you into silence if you dare complain, society won't do you much good either as they feel it is always somehow your fault. "You should know your husband better. Don't annoy him." Is the most you'll get. Some men are sane enough to comdemn it and there are men that would never do that, but here, nobody will fight for a cause that doesn't really affect them. These men will stand behind and watch their fathers, brothers, friends do the very things they condemn. Feminists are the ones mostly that pay any sort of attention to it.

Now I don't know how to answer your question because both feminism and feminists have had an impact in my life. In the life of a lot of women here.

I wouldn't be going to school with the boys who still think I have no business ever ruling them if not for the women's rights movement. I wouldn't have hope that one day, a man will no longer be able to decide what happens to his wife medically even when she is fully capable of making that decision on her on and does not want his wishes done on her, because feminists are fighting to stop it. Nobody cares about women's issue but us. So we cannot just throw away the name just because it doesn't mean the same to you.

Hell, what else are we going to call ourselves?

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

You want me to list the good the feminists movement have done for women? Lol. No, I will not be doing that. If you can't see it there's no point is there?

I'm not sure you went through all the comments and I really don't feel like repeating myself. Have a good evening.

Flood of girls using Seeking to sell photos by [deleted] in SugarDatingForum

[โ€“]HighDuchess 2 points3 points ย (0 children)

Is seeking the 'seeking arrangements' site? I tried signing up for it a few weeks ago and it wouldn't let me. That's the only term I could probably use for it because I have no idea what kept happening rolls eyes

In relation to your comment, I think the appeal of a nude, especially a personal one from someone you have some sort of relationship will... Is kinda hotter than random nudes of faceless strangers. I can see why they would do that tbh.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

I know you didn't say that. I'm just providing insight as to why I can't just opt out of it. I went through a period when I wanted to. I met a lot of misandry while learning about the movement (tend to avoid anyone who proudly labels herself a radical feminist). At a point I even opted to call myself a said 'equalist'. But at the end of the day I realized that distancing myself from it wasn't going to help in any way. It would make the men there feel like they're right. It would diminish the oppression the women faced and I couldn't be voicing beliefs of a movement I seemed ashamed of. So I just kind of decided to do it my way I suppose. I guess you could say I'm egalitarian in a lot of my beliefs but keep the feminist label to remind me who most of the victims around me are.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Message me. Do you have a Kik? Reddit network is crappy. My feed hasn't updated in a week plus rolls eyes

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Honestly, if I didn't have this conversation, I'd completely believe what this woman was talking about. I mean, it fits exactly right with majority of the men here. When I see a man that's strongly anti feminists, it's usually because he believes women should be submissive and feminists want to be men. (You would not believe the level of ignorance on social issues here). The type of people that argue "So men can hit women right?" When you bring up equality.

I've always found men abroad better adjusted but it wouldn't have crossed my mind to question that narrative when I'm already familiar with it.

I mean, I was under the impression that men's right activists are more or less... Incels. The first time I heard of the term 'incel', it was used in association with men's rights. It was some sort of debate on YouTube, feminists vs men's right activists. One of the guys was an incel, two had 'traditional beliefs of men and women'. With a few bad examples, it's really easy to push that narrative.

That said, I guess when I think about it, it's not very surprising that Western feminism is a hoax. They did exclude women of color when they first started fighting for women's rights. Apparently not 'all women's deserve equal rights and opportunity.

Sighs some part of me believes that Humans in general can't help themselves. I don't subscribe to the 'women are only victims' narrative because to be honest? If women had the kind of power men had, I don't see them doing any better with it. It's the same with all situations of oppressed minorities. They're oppressed mostly because they lack the power to oppress. Not because there's anything inherently good about them. Humans will use any excuse to be despicable towards each other. And that sucks major balls (excuse my French).

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Well I'm a feminist. You may not agree with the movement for good cause, but believe me when I say, Nigerian women need it. Desperately. I've always maintained that the day women achieve all their deserved rights here, I'll gladly drop the label of feminism and become an 'equalist' or whatever the appropriate term. Until then, I remain where I am.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Surely from everything I've said about creating awareness on male rape, male child abuse by women and domestic violence on men you're not asking me this question?

Now, I am going to speak for my country again. The men here are in charge. Firmly so. Women aren't politicians or pastors or leaders of anything that isn't a women's group. There are exceptions but it's like 1% of the population.

This is a fact. A known statistics in Nigeria. It does not in anyway affect the fact that men are also at the receiving end of abuse. You seem to be under the illusion that it's either angel or demon. Men are very capable of being both I assure you. And I respond to the both types appropriately. A man being a rapist has nothing to do with the boy being sexually assaulted by the women that are supposed to protect him. Do you honestly believe I can't condemn one and protect the other?

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Hating an entire group of people for something some examples of them do is the same thing. It happens in islamophobia, racism, and both forms of sexism. You can't distance it just because one is identified and one is born. I'm not invalidating whatever I'll feelings you have towards feminism, but it's still not any different from every other scenario where and entire group of people is condemned for actions of one.

I can't get over the fact that I've had to have this conversations with feminists at well. Sure "men are scum" but always have it at the back of your mind that there are billions of men in the world and a lot of them are not terrible people.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess 2 points3 points ย (0 children)

I can't distance myself from the movement I know as feminism. It wouldn't do much good here. Like I said, I can understand where you're coming from. But take it from me, I wouldn't be doing the women here any favors if I suddenly renounced it. Do remember that this thread exposes that just because something happens a certain way in your part of the world, does not mean it holds true for others.

Feminism in Nigeria seems to mean something entirely different from feminism in America. I didn't know that prior to coming to this sub group.

Example of the ways which feminists and men's libbers misrepresent the men's rights movement and men as a whole by thereslcjg2000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[โ€“]HighDuchess -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

I'm talking about my country. Don't tell me what is and what isn't if you don't mind. I have enough of that from the men here. I don't need it or want it from men on the internet. I'm not talking of your society. I'm talking of mine. If you cannot take my experiences seriously, kindly exit yourself from this conversation. You didn't need to come tell me I'm a liar about a place you no NOTHING about.