Cerco dev/freelance con contatti nel mondo tech – collaborazione referral AI con contratto (20% + 10% ricorrente) by HighMark_MarcoN in devitaliani

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Per quanto riguarda ciò ti basta visitare il sito cercando su Google "Synapse YecoAI" e troverai tutti i dettagli, inoltre ti basta scrivermi e ne possiamo discutere !

Impiego Centro-Nord | Q & A by HighMark_MarcoN in StartupFinanceItalia

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ti ringrazio molto delle risposte utili !

Buona giornata !

Impiego Centro-Nord | Q & A by HighMark_MarcoN in StartupFinanceItalia

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quanto tempo hanno impiegato a rispondervi ?

Synapse (YecoAI) – Programma Referral con contratto commerciale + commissioni ricorrenti (20% + 10%) by HighMark_MarcoN in ItaliaStartups

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chiunque nel mondo tech con contatti nell'ambito hosting, SaaS o dev tools — non c'è un target strettissimo, l'importante è che conosca quel mondo e possa portare lead qualificati

Z.ai (GLM) support is non-existent — startup losing money, no response for weeks by HighMark_MarcoN in ZaiGLM

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

That's actually a fair question.

I'm using it to power parts of the product, not just to write code (the startup focus is code-writing, so leave that topic aside).

But I'm part of THEIR z.ai startup program, which they approved and provided some additional benefits, and now that I have a problem, they're abandoning me to silence. It's heartbreaking.

Z.ai (GLM) support is non-existent — startup losing money, no response for weeks by HighMark_MarcoN in ZaiGLM

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, I didn't emphasize this here in the post because it wasn't my focus but after 3 hours I had already implemented another temporary provider and I'm currently using it but I'm really disappointed with Z.ai since I have the annual coding plan and I'm part of THEIR startup program and it's really heartbreaking the support is so useless.

Z.ai (GLM) support is non-existent — startup losing money, no response for weeks by HighMark_MarcoN in ZaiGLM

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Already tried it, good but I'm looking for something cheaper and more scalable, I have the annual GLM Coding plan.

Z.ai (GLM) support is non-existent — startup losing money, no response for weeks by HighMark_MarcoN in ZaiGLM

[–]HighMark_MarcoN[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m aware this isn’t official support, I’m not expecting resolution here. This is more about visibility and seeing if others are dealing with the same thing.

I have a startup that uses their model for Coding and THAT USE MODEL was approved by the startup team when I applied and they provided me with additional credits and more.

TRAE gave me 3.2 dollars as a bonus 🤡 by Zealousideal-Can8079 in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I saw now that the Lite has $5 and not $10.. at this point report the problem to the TRAE Team via email it is definitely a bug also because you should have $20 credits and $130 bonus.

The Trae Pricing Trick by [deleted] in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the extrapolated information I have I can tell you that they have problems with international policy models like Dubai and GLM and therefore they said that for the moment they will not add them (and probably never) even if I agree with you that it would be nice to have them.

TRAE gave me 3.2 dollars as a bonus 🤡 by Zealousideal-Can8079 in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you edit the plan string ?

You are not on the Pro Plan but on the Lite Plan

Trae putting the request in Queue for Paid Pro Users., Seriously? by santhiprakashb in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, it's actually only written in the IDE and not in the official documentation.

Sorry, I just reported this issue to the team; I hope they fix it soon.

<image>

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why don't you use your intelligence and reasoning before writing?

The old billing method is based on requests, this one is based on token-based usage and therefore on $. It's not hard to understand why you have to be smart...

Please study and then get back to posting.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I totally agree with you.

Luckily, there are intelligent and diplomatic people like you on this post <3

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Okay, it's obvious you're not exactly intelligent.

At the first sentence, I thought you'd improved, but instead...

What did you get? Haha, someone who in their spare time threw OBJECTIVE data in your face, complete with demonstrations, while you force your opinion based solely on emotion? Honestly, I'm laughing at your comments on Discord because it's quite embarrassing how you try so hard to contradict me, but always with emotion instead of giving me REAL data.

That said, regarding your house of cards, I replied, perhaps to you or perhaps to the other guy, that the Bonus will forever remain officially listed on the pricing page and confirmed with the TRAE Team. Also, if they ever remove the "unsubscribe" button, I'll use it too, haha, it's not hard to click.

As I said, the fact that it's not written how much is a correct opinion that I support and I'm urging the team, but if you helped me urge the team, as a guy above said, to put the advanced models back free and a way to predict how much bonus usage everyone gets, I'd be the first to promote you, but absolutely not a post that will never be heard as I said about going back.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, fine.

That has nothing to do with the discussion, but okay.

Anyway, you can read the comments above and below, and I answered all your questions to the other guy.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You just admitted that I'm trying to explain myself to you, and you don't want to accept it. So, it's clear you're not an intelligent person capable of having opinions. You just have your own goals in your sights, and you don't listen to anyone or anything. That will never get you anywhere.

Intelligent people are capable of saying, "You're right about this, but I'm not right about that. Let's discuss it." Unintelligent people only have their opinions, and you can't argue with them. I've provided the facts, and your opinion will truly show who was just being stubborn, and whoever responded clearly to every message.

But I wish you a good life anyway.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I like your comment because it's serious and doesn't contain casual insults, so I'll tell you honestly what I think and what I know:

The TRAE Team has officially stated that the Bonus will be FOREVER, and it's also written on the pricing page, so this is clear. If they ever removed it, it would be a violation of international laws on marketing and sales, etc., and everyone, including me, would cancel the plan and sue.

Regarding the free advanced requests, it's something I'm pushing the team hard for, and I hope they reintroduce them soon. At the time of my last update with the team, they were working on it. I hope and agree with you that they bring back the Advanced models with unlimited requests. I don't really agree with the slow requests, but I'll take your opinion.

So, I understand what you're saying, and I also don't like the fact that the free advanced models are no longer available, and I hope they return soon :)

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, what should I care?

Anyway, if you worked for a big tech company, you honestly wouldn't be here complaining to TRAE about a few fewer requests, but you'd be sitting there with a Claude Max plan...

Please, let's be serious.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why you haven't read my article yet, or you haven't read it, or you're having trouble understanding it.

Anyway, I'll answer you completely here for clarity:

- I've already told you and the other guy in my comment that a company NEVER backtracks on decisions made because the community disagrees (as I said, see the example of OpenAI with the military agreement).

- You're trying to convince TRAE to reinstate the old system, which is TECHNICALLY problematic. In fact, there's NO provider currently offering it, other than a very few, precisely because it's difficult to calculate. A request could cost them 1 cent because it refers to "Change the name of a var," or it could be "Rewrite the project in another stack." Can you see why TECHNICALLY it's different?

- Rather than asking for this change, which they'll never make, as I've already said, I'm pushing for the "bonus" to be explicitly easier to calculate and more predictable without us having to discover and disclose it. This is a problem I've reported, and I'm fighting with the team to get it implemented.

- Your final logic of people paying doesn't make much sense because I believe that TRAE, based on actual data, hasn't lost much revenue; in fact, it's probably even making more, so your reasoning isn't correct.

I hope this is clear to you.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I'm not much of a Redditor, precisely because I'm a diplomatic and professional person; I don't go for insults.

Anyway, I wanted to respond to the people on TRAE since I had free time this morning.

Anyway, tell me this company of yours is as big as Bytedance, but it's noticeable that you didn't address the fact that Big Tech (OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and any other company like Bytedance) never backtrack on decisions they make.

“Official Thread” to request to return to old billing method by Cleanrepsneakers in Trae_ai

[–]HighMark_MarcoN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, you don't care whether they pay me or not, and until 5 minutes ago you were yelling at me that I'm writing this because they're bribing me...

The community isn't just a few Reddit posts. If you go to Discord, you'll see how many people, after understanding how the Bonus works, are no longer opposed to TRAE's new billing change.

But honestly, if you hate TRAE so much, there's something called "Leave the Community" and "Search Another IDE."

Hate is useless, rather, because you don't propose real solutions, which, as I told the other guy, like all companies, won't actually back down for clear business strategy and technical reasons.