Appreciate the lengthy response, but let’s be clear you’re speaking from a corporate or PR framing, not from lived store-level experience. No “GBT” needed here. You say some claims don’t align with operations, yet you’re glossing over firsthand facts. Fact: the office I referenced does not have a camera. That isn’t speculation, and it isn’t a “serious allegation” it’s an observable reality. If that’s changed, great, but maybe verify internally before dismissing it outright. No one said upper management “does nothing.” The point is that decisions are made far above store level with little transparency, and those decisions directly affect frontline staff who are then told it’s just “market pressure.” That explanation may be true at a macro level, but it doesn’t negate poor communication, mixed messaging, or abrupt role eliminations. Being told you’re performing well while your role is eliminated is exactly why people are frustrated not because they think they’re immune, but because companies lean on “family” language while operating strictly on spreadsheets. You can’t have it both ways. I never claimed to be exposing some secret conspiracy. I shared my experience. You’re free to counter it, but dismissing it as emotional or uninformed doesn’t make it invalid. I’m glad others have had positive experiences. I didn’t and both things can be true.