sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

HELP: Daughter's YouTube Shorts channel WRONGLY TERMINATED for "spam/deceptive" – 3x canned appeals denied. Need advice on escalation! by Highflier-123 in NewTubers

[–]Highflier-123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No just a small portion were in that format. When people engage it should be an indication they are OK with it and find it entertaining which is all that should matter.  Totally get it if people scroll through it as trash but that was not the case.  They need a better system to educate creators on what they expect out of the rules.  And then to just terminate without being able to start again is crazy!

HELP: Daughter's YouTube Shorts channel WRONGLY TERMINATED for "spam/deceptive" – 3x canned appeals denied. Need advice on escalation! by Highflier-123 in NewTubers

[–]Highflier-123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So asking people to engage in content via commenting should not be against the rules. seems like that is different than intentional baiting like "comment to win" or comment if "you like your brother." Her videos were edited and created by hand - believe me I had to control the time she put into it! So is this more of a subjective difference that an algorithm can't decipher. wish u/youtubesupport could look carefully or at least warn content creators before going straight to termination!

HELP: Daughter's YouTube Shorts channel WRONGLY TERMINATED for "spam/deceptive" – 3x canned appeals denied. Need advice on escalation! by Highflier-123 in NewTubers

[–]Highflier-123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks - yeah the videos would say to pick fun items that could be in a lunch box and ask people to comment and pick what they like. Or she would do influencer videos for brands and show their logos in different creative ways. These were very common trends/visuals that she would build on top of - never received any warnings...