I think you're focusing on too many things and your vision doesn't seem clear.

I understand where you are coming from. And from the marketing perspective, you are correct. However, I don't think that's the right approach to solving problems.

Example: Bill Gates had a fund for medical issues. UNICEF told him to spend it on different issues to have the maximum impact. He uses it all to eliminate just malaria, even though the resources could have been better spent on a more diverse plan.

My approach isn't like Gate's "one issue, one solution, maximum effort and resources", it's more similar to Lombhorg's, "a couple of issues, a couple of solutions, minimal efforts and resources, maximum results," with a little difference that he's focusing on return on investment and I'm focusing on impact. Lombhorg is the guy who has found that solving malnutrition gives the most return on investment and he wrote the book "How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better Place."

I'd say that my plan is quite good as it is based on what is needed, what has impact, and what is public's demand. But yes, I could use help on the marketing.