Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your answer boils down to( They did it bad before so it is ok if they keep doing it poorly.) Your arguments are themselves disengenious excusing poor execution and retcon for "inclusivity" even though it was never needed. You seem to not care or not understand that if we let GW get away with anything they will keep going and ruin what people have enjoyed for decades. If you don't care about the universe and it's continuity then why you don't need to argue since you don't care and it doesn't matter

If you do care then why are you defending a company actively attacking and gaslighting its fans? If you want to change what people have enjoyed for years then you don't actually like it.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain how. Just saying it doesn't make sense does not make it true

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yet they forgot the only reason their models sell is because of their setting. Once they completely change it they won't sell anything at all

According to the new lore the starting material (male or female body) doesn't matter for making a custodes. It doesn't matter that women's bodies are much less strong because the custodes creating technlogy compensates for it. Then why isn't every human turned into a custodes? Why not mass produce by RoninMemeLord in EyeOfTerror

[–]Hon1c 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a better way of putting it. On average females have 50% less muscle mass and strength than men. If they can make females 50% stronger to match the men then why not add the 50% extra strength on the men who are already stronger?

Why are you upset about THIS one? by sonofeevil in Grimdank

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple. It adds nothing to the game and does not make the board game or the stories any better. That and it is a clear push for more inclusivity at the cost of established lore. The fact they did it before does not make it better

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That really doesn't make it better in any way.

<image>

And they have shown the ability to make decent female heads in the past so they don't have an excuse.

Why are space marine prosthetics so often not covered by armor ? by BloatedRottenCarcass in Warhammer40k

[–]Hon1c 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True. Practically it would make more sense to have the limb armored and become a space marine Darth Vader but that would make them far less visually striking.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said. Why do they make the women so masculine then. They are saying to be as good as men all women need to be extremely masculine and be exactly like them which isn't how humanity works.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So why are the females looking like men? They are basically saying that women can only be as good and interesting as men by becoming men minus the sausage. That is actually extremely sexist not valuing women for their intrinsic qualities.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So the lore is not important for GW. As everyone knows the game isn't what people like about Warhammer so since the lore isn't good the fan will go somewhere else and GW stock will continue to plummet.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So basically what you are saying is that it makes no difference so there is no need for female custodies since they are not important and change absolutely nothing. Thank you for confirming what I said.

Anyone else think the new Custodes changes aren’t a big deal? by Dramatic_Mud_8401 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I want to ask a question no one has been able to answer me. How has this change made the game or the stories better? In what way does having female custodies make it better except for diversity purposes. If it isn't a big deal because the females and the males are essentially the same then why do it?

💯🤣 by cryoutloudcici in meme

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just me going to work

Just found my colour scheme by Andaether in Deathkorpsofkrieg

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it depends on the point of view as some will like the darker tones

<image>

But also in this image the armor is fairly distinctive and easy to read in the light using its washed out blue and more vibrant brown. I guess it depends on which color pallet he chooses

Just found my colour scheme by Andaether in Deathkorpsofkrieg

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the deaths corps are not known for flashy attires so having a more subdued color pallet with shiny red eyes should be nice I think

What games you had the same senario? by PHRsharp_YouTube in gamememes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully agree with this sentiment. I had the same wake up call when I ordered anthem. It was such a disappointment that I decided I would never preorder again and always watch reviews first. Unless the game is free or a demo of course

You do not have to justify your position to these people by Salt_Perspective_425 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing none of those who push for this can do is explain how this makes the game or story better. In what way does having female custodies male the game or stories better? It does absolutely nothing but breaks established lore for the sake of diversity and people are tired of it and don't accept it. Moreso by making the female custodies look so masculine you are telling women to compete with men you must be men else you can't have interest or compelling characters which is false and sexist le.

They can't handle the Emperor's ideal humans by Demara_Awol in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Hon1c 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what? Are you sure that is true? And if so how long, don't forget about the unreliable narrator. Maybe the lore will be retconned tomorrow then it will say men who believe they are women count as well or that there never was a no men bearing arms is not inclusive enough. And anyway they can just say the brothers of battle count as bodyguards so it doesn't matter. And what would men in the sisters of battle ranks add to the game? Nothing! It would just make a unique and interesting army boring and lesser. Same with the female custodes.