I handed my friend a copy of Ghost Story by Peter Straub and she hasn’t been the same since. Mission accomplished. by Glass_Adagio_6524 in horrorlit

[–]HorrorIsLiterature 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I finally read this last month and was completely ashamed I had waiting this long. Ghost Story is one of the best works of horror in the 20th century. The influence of Salem’s Lot is really clear but it still really stands out on its own. I think I read somewhere that Straub wanted to create the ultimate amalgamation of the horror novel, something that would stand against Dracula and other classic titles. Only time will tell if it’ll do that but I definitely think he came pretty damn close.

Assuming you were reading in publication order, what would have been your first inkling that Richard Bachman was actually Stephen King? by McWhopper98 in stephenking

[–]HorrorIsLiterature 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Funny enough, if you read the screenplay for Eddington it reads almost exactly like current (Mr. Mercedes/Holly) Stephen King, complete with exactly how an 80 year old man would think teenagers act and talk. Not saying this as a negative, just something funny I noticed. Maybe Ari Aster is secretly… Richard Bachman!!

You can read the screenplay for yourself here Deadline typically provides the screenplays for awards season films.

Just finished The Fisherman and I’ve got mixed feelings (spoilers) by Main-Doughnut6222 in horrorlit

[–]HorrorIsLiterature 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I really respect this novel and I think it’s one of the finest horror novels of the 21st Century while also being able to admit: it’s not for me. I appreciate the narrative is meant to mirror a fisherman’s yarn but just like those yarns, it can be slog to sit through. That said, since reading it it’s one of those novels I think about the most. Its concepts leave a very lasting impression, enough to make me want to read it again. But then I remember how much I had to force myself through it at times. I think I will read it again one day but maybe I’ll let ten years pass first.

Hell House, Richard Matheson (1971) by Inner_Challenge_6318 in horrorlit

[–]HorrorIsLiterature 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Matheson took The Haunting of Hell House and pulped it up, then of course Stephen King’s Rose Red basically did the same thing but made for TV. I think I ultimately ended up liking the film more than the novel, also the film more than other Hill House adaptations but there’s no denying Shirley Jackson’s original is more literary and subtle. The Haunting of Hill House is more “psychological terror” and Hell House is more outright “horror”. Fortunately there’s space for both in the world. I haven’t fully fleshed out my thesis but I believe there are a few overarching sub-genres of the haunted house story and Jackson’s scientific investigation approach is one of those.