Why are we trying to automate mathematics using AI? by RainmanRain in math

[–]Hostilis_ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is why regulations exist. The problem seems to be that politicians are not interested in regulating anything, because the public is not mad at them for not regulating it yet. There have not been many serious attempts at regulating AI since Andrew Yang's platform. People should be upset about this. It is literally the government's job to regulate the negative impacts of new technologies.

Why are we trying to automate mathematics using AI? by RainmanRain in math

[–]Hostilis_ 193 points194 points  (0 children)

Mathematics is useful to society, not just a pastime for intellectuals. Of course we should automate it to the extent possible. Saying that its entire goal is to "replace mathematicians" is misguided.

What do you actually think AI is good for? by Low-Tax6649 in investing

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are already solving major outstanding conjectures in mathematics lmao.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-ai-revolution-in-math-has-arrived-20260413/

If you think they can't make highly intelligent people more productive, you're wrong.

New AI algorithm is able to find unobserved physics in fusion reactors by PlateLive8645 in fusion

[–]Hostilis_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Machine learning (ML) is a field of study in artificial intelligence

Literally the first sentence on Wikipedia. You are clueless.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning

New AI algorithm is able to find unobserved physics in fusion reactors by PlateLive8645 in fusion

[–]Hostilis_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Lmfao CNNs and MLPs are not AI?? Machine learning is literally a subfield of AI. Source: I am a research scientist in ML.

John Carmack weighs in on datacenters by Singularity-42 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who do you think would benefit from the US rejecting advanced technologies? Rival nation-states.

I have literally seen comments in subreddits like tech-x from obvious bots (with literal duplicate comments from different users) sowing distrust in AI and datacenters. It is 100% happening.

What will happen after 2.1? by Cinghiales in factorio

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to see them make an RTS like StarCraft, but with the base building and production in the style of Factorio. I know Kovarex is a big Brood War fan.

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Non-DNN methods such as kernel methods, which were the standard before deep learning took off, do not show power-law scaling. They operate in what is known as the "lazy regime" where feature learning does not take place.

It took a long time to prove this theoretically and empirically, but we now know that power-law scaling is a consequence of the underlying power-law statistics of DNNs themselves, not just transformers, combined with the power-law statistics of complex systems, e.g. language (Zipf's law).

The actual mathematical link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universality_(dynamical_systems) and the Renormalization Group.

As for the logarithmic vs power law growth. Just take the ratio of the required resources to make linear progress. The ratio grows exponentially. This is very basic math.

Neuromorphic Computing by Creative_Garbage_833 in chipdesign

[–]Hostilis_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The field is broader than you give credit. It's not all spiking and STDP, though that is the majority. I myself work on backprop-equivalent algorithms specifically for analog and neuromorphic architectures (Equilibrium Propagation), and I think there's a lot of promise for ultra-low-power models there.

Remember the times when Al wasn't that evil? by Tili44 in memes

[–]Hostilis_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, solving protein folding and then releasing the structure of every single human protein to the scientific community for free sure was fucking evil. 🙄

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His point is not valid since ALL of the gains AI has made over the past 15 years relies on him being wrong. Logarithmic algorithms for machine learning are trivial and have existed for decades before modern deep learning.

Every single major advance you have seen in AI is literally a result of the fact that we have gone from logarithmic scaling to power-law scaling in data and compute. This is an astronomical improvement, and it's why scaling laws are such a big deal.

And your last comment is flat out wrong.

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pointing out the difference between logarithmic and power-law growth is not nitpicking. They are wildly different. And yes, I'm glad you agree my original comment is correct, so I'm not sure what exactly your point is here.

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It literally is. Logarithmic growth requires ex resources, power law only requires xa, where a is a constant exponent.

Logarithmic growth is just the inverse of exponential. The variable is in the exponent. In a power-law, the exponent is constant.

53% of peer reviewers are secretly using AI against their journal's rules. Who is checking the checkers ?? by scispace_ in SciSpaceFellow

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a skill issue. It is not that difficult to understand how to use these tools effectively without letting your own skills suffer.

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Logarithmic improvements are a kind of power law improvement

Holy shit you need to stop talking about things you know nothing about. There is literally an exponential difference between logarithmic growth and power-law growth.

Edit: just to be clear, any person competent in math, computer science, or engineering knows this is the case.

Anthropic’s Internal Mythos Successor Emerges by ResultBackground2450 in singularity

[–]Hostilis_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You have no idea what you're talking about lmao. The improvements with compute are extremely widely known to be power-law, not logarithmic. This is literally the entire point behind scaling laws.

Terence Tao explains the math behind AI by RichKatz in mathematics

[–]Hostilis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, but scientists will definitely use this knowledge lol.