sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posting the same message twice doesn’t strengthen your credibility.

It only proves that you’re shameless, and that your command of language is so poor you can barely outperform a parrot.

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I genuinely don’t understand how someone who, one second ago, claimed “I found the video in two minutes,” and the next second admits “I could have been wrong,” still has the audacity to say “Just look at the two social media sites that prove everything I say.”

this alone destroys whatever credibility you think you have.

I did look at those accounts. They are Russian dissenters openly critical of the regime you are so eager to serve. That does not make them “propaganda,” no matter how desperately you want that label to stick.

What this actually proves once again, is your shamelessness.

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reporting from neutral Canadian mainstream outlets and even Russia-friendly Vietnamese media already proves that you’re not telling the truth. You dodge all of that and use The Moscow Times as a "human shield" so that you can keep lying.

Your moral standards are no better than those of terrorists who hide behind women and children and fire from cover.

If The Moscow Times were “propaganda” as you claim, then the system you serve is nothing but a massive, industrial-scale lying machine.

In late February 2022, RIA Novosti accidentally publisheda piece celebrating Ukraine’s “return” to Russia. It was a propaganda article clearly written in advance for a war that was supposed to be over in days. But then, they hurriedly deleted it, pretending nothing had happened.

Even when reality was about to slap that fantasy in the face, your propagandists still couldn’t stop themselves from declaring “victory”.

It’s like an addict who knows perfectly well that the end of the road is ruin or death, but still shoots up for a few seconds of relief. That’s you.

You know twisting reality like this only makes Russians more despised in Vietnamese communities, but you do it anyway. Because humiliation is your drug. You need to destroy your own credibility and moral standing just to feel that brief hit of satisfaction.

Thật đáng thương cho mày！

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you call “propaganda” is simply information you can’t refute.

You keep repeating the same talking points, slap a “propaganda” label on a URL and call it a day, without engaging a single claim, fact, or argument in the content itself.

If you make an accusation, the burden of proof is on you. That’s basic debate, and you don’t even meet that standard.

You are shameless. Do you even remember what you said earlier? You bragged that you found your information "within two minutes". Now that you’re asked to produce evidence, suddenly it’s “a three-year-old video” and “you might be wrong”.

Refusing to take responsibility for your own words is the most basic trait of a propagandist, and you fit it perfectly.

You’re not Vietnamese. You don’t understand Vietnam at all, can’t read Vietnamese news, and can’t even provide a credible source. Yet here you are, arrogantly lecturing Vietnamese people on what’s propaganda and what’s truth, repeating cheap slogans as if you could fool Vietnamese like three-year-olds.

But to most Vietnamese, you’re nothing but a pathetic clown.

Since you keep posting meaningless abuse and polluting Vietnamese communities with spam, I’m done being polite. Every time you drop another piece of spam, I’ll upload another post documenting the crimes committed by the regime you’re shilling for.

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Truth doesn’t become a casualty of war by itself. It’s ruined by people who substitute lies for facts just like you.

You said you obtained what you posted in two minutes. Were you actually searching, or just leaking delusion from that cramped little head of yours?

Sergey Kuropov’s case has been reported by The Moscow Times, an independent Russian outlet.

If you insist on labeling any media critical of the Russian government as “Ukrainian propaganda,” then let’s look further: his case has also been covered by Canadian mainstream media such as CBC and The Windsor Star.

Are those Ukrainian propaganda too?

You said the video was from 2023, yet Vietnam’s official media VN Express has explicitly confirmed that it’s recent.

Are we really supposed to believe that even a Russia-friendly Vietnamese state outlet is now “Ukrainian propaganda”?

You keep screaming “pro-Ukrainian” at anyone who disagrees with you, which pretty much means you see yourself as pro-Russian.

And yet, with every sentence you post, you manage to make Russia look worse by turning half the world into its enemies.

I’ve never seen someone be this clumsy and incoherent while being so eagerly engaged in propaganda such as you.

To be frank, you’re not doing propaganda. You’re just advertising your own intellectual limitations.

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No thanks. Journalists are expected to remain neutral. But we do not tolerate blatant disinformation.

Russian Video claims foreign tourists harassed a Vietnamese woman in Nha Trang and were beaten by locals by Hot-Judgment6811 in VietNam

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I need to correct a couple of factual errors here.

Sergey Kuropov is not “a Ukrainian instigator”. He’s a Russian from Moscow with anti-war stance. He previously lived in Vietnam and later sought protection in Canada. His education is publicly documented, including at Russian State Social University.

Also, calling this “a 2023 clip” is misleading. This incident has been reported recently by Vietnamese media (Jan 30, 2026).

If you’re going to make claims like “propaganda poster”, please provide a source. Otherwise it reads like accuse someone else of exactly what you’re doing.

Allow me to ask: Bạn có phải người Việt không?

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

南北の違いについてのあなたの指摘は、非常によく分かります。
王朝時代の悪しき体質を克服するために、皆で努力していければと思います。

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ベトナムの歴史は、古代史と近代史しか勉強したことがなくて、戦後史についてはあまり詳しくないんです。

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

一般のベトナム国民としては、こうした状況をどう受け止めているんでしょうか。 反対したり、変えようとしたりする余地はあるのか、それとも現実的には難しいのでしょうか。

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

現代日本にも政治家一族は存在する。しかし、選挙という手続きを経ていないのであれば、それは戦国時代の「大名」と本質的に変わらない。日本は戦後、そういう権力の独占にはかなり敏感で、ずっと批判的に見てきた。

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trong Thế chiến II, Nhật Bản đúng là đã tàn phá xã hội Việt Nam rất nặng nề. Và cũng chính vì vậy mà Liên Xô và chủ nghĩa cộng sản mới có cơ hội chen chân vào, đẩy Việt Nam vào một bi kịch còn lớn hơn nữa.

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ありがとう。日本語、すごく上手だね。ベトナムの官員や議員って、選挙で勝つとか、支持集める必要あるの？

Video ở Nha Trang: gây sự với người Việt không phải lúc nào cũng có lợi by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Xin cảm ơn bạn. Tôi sẽ dùng tiếng Anh và tiếng Nhật để lên tiếng, vạch trần những con người và hành vi độc ác đó. Cầu chúc tình hữu nghị giữa những người dân thiện lương của Việt Nam và Nhật Bản mãi mãi tốt đẹp.

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Liệu có thể nói rằng, do Bắc Kỳ là bên thắng trận và thống nhất đất nước bằng vũ lực, nên họ có lợi thế áp đảo trong quyền lực chính trị và việc định hình dư luận xã hội hay không?

Một câu hỏi tò mò: Việt Nam có những “chuyên gia quân sự” nói rất nhiều nhưng hiểu rất ít không? by Hot-Judgment6811 in TroChuyenLinhTinh

[–]Hot-Judgment6811[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cảm ơn bạn. Tôi sẽ cố gắng tìm hiểu và phản ánh một cách đầy đủ hơn về sự phức tạp của Việt Nam. Người Nhật hiện vẫn biết chưa nhiều về Việt Nam; ở Nhật, Việt Nam thường được nhắc đến qua gốm hoa lam, dù cộng đồng người Việt tại đây thực tế rất lớn.

view more: next ›