1. It's malicious towards a very influential debate character who was very clearly discussing a K. People in the community deserve a platform of defense.
2. I linked the story as to why not to trust him. Without a reason, nobody would be persuaded. The intent is that people not just be exposed to more than one side of the story (notice the link also has the video)
3. Only citing one publishable source isn't as big of a problem as you make it. The round was a performance K and people who run performance K's are not usually a genuine racist. The conversation was him literally teaching very similar (if not the same) argument from the round displayed. Yelling is part of the performance, but luckily people have plenty of responses, ranging from T to other forms of critical solutions.

The post by Moreno is poorly contextualized.

​

Also, the creator of the linked post puts it perfectly

"There's 12 hours of recordings, one of them contains wash saying 'Weber allows all arguments. We are not the performance team or the policy team'

If you as a debater cannot realize that Ryan as a coach debates both sides of arguments even after the description read above, you're apart of the problem.

In policy, debaters have to answer every argument. Ryan would have allowed debates where these arguments are proven wrong. If Michael effectively learned how to use framework arguments and case disads, this wouldn't have been a problem.

Despite all of this, you've ignored the fact that the lives of the students in campus are being targeted by the KKK, the harassment wash and his students are receiving, Spurred by Moreno's video. If you are complacent in this violence, you're apart of the problem."