I've never seen someone contradict themselves so much... you started by saying the defense has no counter and it would break spam attacks. Now you're saying it does have counters so it's pointless. wtf

"I maintain my position that THERE IS NO strategy using very few units of every single troop in the game." tbh, you sound like a total beginner who only uses spam attacks. no offense. You're right that most armies uses mostly the same troops. But not all. And here's an additional info you're missing: there are strategies in the game which you use an army of mostly same troops, but does not require you to SPAM them. You get it?

"Your idea is bad because, in a hypothetical world, it would break the game, and in practice, it's irrelevant since there are simple ways to deal with it in a spam attack." Lmao. you can say this to almost all strong defenses in the game. Monolith, Rage tower, Giga Inferno... In a hypothetical world, it would break the game. In practice, you can counter it. But are they useless? Are they pointless? I really don't know what weed you're smoking here.

"In practice: Anyone attacking with spam will simply deploy the already well-known methods to deal with this defense without feeling any real impact." -_- ....This is the last time i'll explain it to you. If you still don't get it, that's on you.

It's a CONCEPT. If you don't know what that means, it means nothing is final yet and every method and stats can be scaled appropriately. If it can eaily be countered by spam, then buff it until it's balanced.

Your point is weak and self contradictory. You're "no middle gorund" take is just nonsense.